Baseline testing and long-term monitoring of the Lambert Road Bridge for the long-term bridge performance program

The objective of the long-term bridge performance (LTBP) program is to collect, document, and make available high quality quantitative performance data for a representative sample of bridges nationwide. As such, the LTBP program will collect data, perform analyses, develop models, and enhance education and practices aimed at extending bridge service life. Data will be collected through live-load and dynamic testing, physical material testing, detailed inspections, NDT/NDE, and long-term structural health monitoring. As part of the pilot phase of the overall program, seven bridges across the United States have been tested and are in various stages of being instrumented for long-term structural health monitoring. This paper focuses on a two-span, post-tensioned, box girder bridge located near Sacramento, California, which is one of the initial pilot bridges. The initial live-load and dynamic testing, physical material testing, detailed visual inspection, and an NDE deck scan have already been performed to establish the baseline bridge condition for future comparisons. Long-term instrumentation including strain gauges, velocity transducers, tiltmeters, vibrating wire strain gauges, thermocouples, and a real time camera have been installed. Once long-term bridge behavior is understood, maintenance decision tools can be developed that will aid bridge owners and administrators in better practice management. This paper describes the initial testing, baseline evaluation, and the long-term monitoring program that was developed.

[1]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[2]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Dynamic Field Testing for Condition Assessment of Bridge Bents , 2001 .

[3]  O. S. Salawu,et al.  BRIDGE ASSESSMENT USING FORCED-VIBRATION TESTING , 1995 .

[4]  Jun Yu,et al.  Investigation of a System Identification Methodology in the Context of the ASCE Benchmark Problem , 2004 .

[5]  O S Salawu Assessment of bridges: use of dynamic testing , 1997 .

[6]  J. Stanton,et al.  Effects of Temperature Variations on Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders , 2005 .

[7]  John T. DeWolf,et al.  Passive Structural Health Monitoring of Connecticut's Bridge Infrastructure , 2007 .

[8]  Mo Shing Cheung,et al.  DYNAMIC MONITORING OF THE CONFEDERATION BRIDGE , 1997 .

[9]  Brahim Benmokrane,et al.  Structural health monitoring of innovative bridges in Canada with fiber optic sensors , 2001 .

[10]  Dionisio Bernal,et al.  Flexibility-Based Approach for Damage Characterization: Benchmark Application , 2004 .

[11]  Marc O. Eberhard,et al.  LATERAL-LOAD RESPONSE OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE. FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT , 1993 .

[12]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Application of a Statistical Model Updating Approach on Phase I of the IASC-ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Study , 2004 .

[13]  David Cebon,et al.  EFFECTS OF HEAVY-VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS ON PAVEMENT RESPONSE AND PERFORMANCE , 1991 .

[14]  Sanghyun Choi,et al.  Modal Property Changes of a Seismically Damaged Concrete Bridge , 2005 .

[15]  James L. Beck,et al.  Two-Stage Structural Health Monitoring Approach for Phase I Benchmark Studies , 2004 .