Evaluating the Use of Digital Product Repositories to Enhance Product Dissection Activities in the Classroom

Product dissection has been used successfully in a variety of ways to actively engage students in their learning; however, using product dissection in the classroom does have drawbacks: products, tools, and their upkeep can be costly, workspace and storage space can be difficult to obtain, and even the best crafted dissection assignments can end in chaos. Recent cyberinfrastructure initiatives seek to create ubiquitous, comprehensive, interactive, and functionally complete digital environments for research communities that consist of people, data, information, tools, and instruments. With product dissection as our unifying theme, we are applying cyberinfrastructure tools and technologies to undergraduate engineering education and assessing the impact of these tools on student learning. Specifically, the project combines product dissection activities at three universities with two digital design repositories CAD modeling and animation, video, and MediaWiki technology to enable cyberinfrastructure-based product dissection activities. Lessons learned from these efforts are presented from the students' perspectives as well as that of the faculties in both engineering and computer science. The implications for implementing the developments on a national scale are discussed along with ongoing research.

[1]  Steven B. Shooter,et al.  Using Cyber Infrastructure Enhanced Product Dissection To Introduce Engineering To Middle School Students , 2008 .

[2]  John S. Lamancusa,et al.  The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum , 1997 .

[3]  Hans Vossensteyn Trends and issues in higher education , 2006 .

[4]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[5]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Update On Impec: An Integrated First Year Engineering Curriculum At N.C. State University , 1997 .

[6]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[7]  Ra Callander,et al.  Teaching engineering design , 1972 .

[8]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[9]  Ronald E. Barr,et al.  An Introduction to Engineering Through an Integrated Reverse Engineering and Design Graphics Project , 2000 .

[10]  Bruce Carlson,et al.  A Motivational First‐year Electronics Lab Course , 1997 .

[11]  Roy Rada,et al.  Standards: free or sold? , 1995, CACM.

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Virtual and Physical Dissection Activities on Students’ Understanding of Engineering Design Principles , 2008 .

[13]  James E. Groccia,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Students' Experiences in Two Instructional Formats of an Introductory Materials Science Course , 1997 .

[14]  Diane L. Beaudoin,et al.  A Product and Process Engineering Laboratory for Freshmen , 1995 .

[15]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Malking Connections to Engineering During the First Two Years , 1992, Proceedings. Twenty-Second Annual conference Frontiers in Education.

[16]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[17]  John S. Lamancusa,et al.  Learning Engineering by Product Dissection , 1996 .

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Computers in Education: Activities, Contributions, and Future Trends , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[19]  Weiming Shen,et al.  A review of Internet-based product information sharing and visualization , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[20]  Zahed Siddique Internet Design Studio , 2004 .

[21]  S. Sheppard MECHANICAL DISSECTION: AN EXPERIENCE IN HOW THINGS WORK , 1996 .