ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPLICATIONS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Over the last few years or so, the use of artificial neural networks ( ANNs) has increased in many areas of engineering. In particular, ANNs have been applied to many geotechnical engineering problems and have demonstrated some degree of success. A review of the literature reveals that ANNs have been used successfully in pile capacity prediction, modelling soil behaviour, site characterisation, earth retaining structures, settlement of structures, slope stability, design of tunnels and underground openings, liquefaction, soil permeability and hydraulic conductivity, soil compaction, soil swelling and classification of soils. The objective of this paper is to provide a general view of some ANN applications for solving some types of geotechnical engineering problems. It is not intended to describe the ANNs modelling issues in geotechnical engineering. The paper also does not intend to cover every single application or scientific paper that found in the literature. For brevity, some works are selected to be described in some detail, while others are acknowledged for reference purposes. The paper then discusses the strengths and limitations of ANNs compared with the other modelling approaches. The engineering properties of soil and rock exhibit varied and uncertain behaviour due to the complex and imprecise physical processes associated with the formation of these materials (Jaksa 1995). This is in contrast to most other civil engineering materials, such as steel, concrete and timber, which exhibit far greater homogeneity and isotropy. In order to cope with the complexity of geotechnical behaviour, and the spatial variability of these materials, traditional forms of engineering design models are justifiably simplified. An alternative approach, which has been shown to have some degree of success, is based on the data alone to determine the structure and parameters of the model . The technique is known as artificial neural networks ( ANNs) and is well suited to model complex problems where the relationship between the model variables is unknown (Hubick 1992). This paper is intended to be for readers in the field of geotechnical engineering who are not familiar with artificial neural networks. The paper aims to detail some features associated with ANNs through a review for some of their applications to-date in geotechnical engineering. It is hoped that this review may attract more geotechnical engineers to pay better attention to this promising tool. The paper starts with a brief overview of the structure and operation of the ANNs and gives a general overview of most ANN applications that have appeared in the geotechncial engineering literature. Finally, the paper discusses the relative success of ANNs in predicting various geotechnical engineering properties and behaviour.

[1]  J. Shi.  REDUCING PREDICTION ERROR BY TRANSFORMING INPUT DATA FOR NEURAL NETWORKS , 2000 .

[2]  H. R. Maier,et al.  Predicting the Settlement of Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils Using BackPropagation Neural Networks by , 2000 .

[3]  K. S. Wong,et al.  Estimation of lateral wall movements in braced excavations using neural networks , 1995 .

[4]  Yacoub M. Najjar,et al.  NEURAL MODELING OF KANSAS SOIL SWELLING , 1996 .

[5]  Toru Shibata,et al.  EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIALS OF SOILS USING CONE PENETRATION TESTS , 1988 .

[6]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  PREDICTION OF PILE CAPACITY USING NEURAL NETWORKS , 1997 .

[7]  G G Mayerhof,et al.  Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations , 1976 .

[8]  Rui Zhao,et al.  Stress-Strain Modeling of Sands Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1995 .

[9]  Yacoub M. Najjar,et al.  A Neural Network Approach for Site Characterization and Uncertainty Prediction , 1996 .

[10]  Philippe L. Bourdeau,et al.  Assessing the Liquefaction Susceptibility at a Site Based on Information from Penetration Testing , 1997 .

[11]  Robert M. Semple,et al.  Shaft Capacity of Driven Pipe Piles in Clay , 1984 .

[12]  John Burland,et al.  SHAFT FRICTION OF PILES IN CLAY--A SIMPLE FUNDAMENTAL APPROACH , 1973 .

[13]  J. Schmertmann,et al.  Improved Strain Influence Factor Diagrams , 1978 .

[14]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Modelling of shearing behaviour of a residual soil with Recurrent Neural Network , 1998 .

[15]  Robert M. Pap,et al.  Handbook of neural computing applications , 1990 .

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney.  THE SITING PROBLEM , 1980 .

[17]  D. E. Dougherty,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Site Characterization Using “Hard” and “Soft” Information , 1994 .

[18]  R B Peck,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice; second edition , 1967 .

[19]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Constitutive modeling of geomaterials from non-uniform material tests , 1998 .

[20]  Jean-Lou Chameau,et al.  Geomaterial Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1997 .

[21]  Hossam E. Ali,et al.  CPT-Based Liquefaction Potential Assessment: A Neuronet Approach , 1998 .

[22]  Tarek Hegazy,et al.  Potential applications of neural networks in construction , 1992 .

[23]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1995 .

[24]  Hossam Eldin Ali,et al.  Neuronet-Based Approach for Assessing Liquefaction Potential of Soils , 1998 .

[25]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  M. Jaksa.  The influence of spatial variability on the geotechnical design properties of a stiff, overconsolidated clay. , 1995 .

[27]  Ian Flood,et al.  Neural Networks in Civil Engineering. I: Principles and Understanding , 1994 .

[28]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Introduction to artificial neural systems , 1992 .

[29]  Anthony T. C. Goh.  Modeling soil correlations using neural networks , 1995 .

[30]  Glenn W. Ellis,et al.  Neural Network Modeling of the Mechanical Behavior of Sand , 1992 .

[31]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1948 .

[32]  In Mo Lee,et al.  Prediction of pile bearing capacity using artificial neural networks , 1996 .

[33]  Laurene V. Fausett,et al.  Fundamentals Of Neural Networks , 1994 .

[34]  John H. Schmertmann,et al.  Static Cone to Compute Static Settlement over Sand , 1970 .

[35]  M. W Gardner,et al.  Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences , 1998 .

[36]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  New nested adaptive neural networks (NANN) for constitutive modeling , 1998 .

[37]  R. L. Sterling,et al.  IDENTIFYING PROBABLE FAILURE MODES FOR UNDERGROUND OPENINGS USING A NEURAL NETWORK , 1992 .

[38]  Harry M. Coyle,et al.  NEW DESIGN CORRELATIONS FOR PILES IN SAND , 1981 .

[39]  Frank Rausche,et al.  BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES FROM DYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS , 1975 .

[40]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Modeling of soil behavior with a recurrent neural network , 1998 .

[41]  Anthony T. C. Goh.  Nonlinear modelling in geotechnical engineering using neural networks , 1994 .

[42]  Molly M. Gribb,et al.  Use of neural networks for hydraulic conductivity determination in unsaturated soil , 1994 .

[43]  John B. Dunckee.  The Iron Wharf At Fort Monroe, Va. , 1892 .

[44]  Chul-Wook Lee,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Integrated With Expert System For Preliminary Design Of Tunnels And Slopes , 1995 .

[45]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  Empirical design in geotechnics using neural networks , 1995 .

[46]  Xiping Wu,et al.  Use of neural networks in the analysis and interpretation of site investigation data , 1994 .

[47]  C. H. Juang,et al.  A fuzzy neural network approach to evaluation of slope failure potential , 1996 .

[48]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  NEURAL NETWORK: AN ALTERNATIVE TO PILE DRIVING FORMULAS , 1995 .

[49]  J Biarez,et al.  BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT OF PILE FOUNDATIONS , 1977 .

[50]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Neural Network Modeling of Anisotropic Aggregate Behavior from Repeated Load Triaxial Tests , 1998 .

[51]  S. Pamukcu,et al.  Characterization of Granular Material by Low Strain Dynamic Excitation and ANN , 1996 .

[52]  Yacoub M. Najjar,et al.  On the identification of compaction characteristics by neuronets , 1996 .

[53]  A. Goh.  Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks , 1994 .

[54]  S Arumugam,et al.  RATE DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF CLAYS USING NEURAL NETWORKS , 1994 .

[55]  Yacoub M. Najjar,et al.  Site Characterization by Neuronets: An Application to the Landfill Siting Problem , 1996 .

[56]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  CPT‐Based Liquefaction Evaluation Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[57]  Jingsheng Shi,et al.  MODULAR NEURAL NETWORKS FOR PREDICTING SETTLEMENTS DURING TUNNELING , 1998 .

[58]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  Neural-Network Modeling of CPT Seismic Liquefaction Data , 1996 .

[59]  Girish Agrawal,et al.  Estimating Clay Liner and Cover Permeability Using Computational Neural Networks , 1994 .

[60]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  Pile Driving Records Reanalyzed Using Neural Networks , 1996 .

[61]  N. Sivakugan,et al.  Settlement Predictions Using Neural Networks , 1998 .

[62]  Raymond L. Sterling,et al.  A neural network- Expert system hybrid approach for tunnel design , 1992 .

[63]  Dayakar Penumadu,et al.  Triaxial compression behavior of sand and gravel using artificial neural networks (ANN) , 1999 .

[64]  Yudong Cal,et al.  Soil classification by neural network , 1995 .

[65]  Riley M. Chung,et al.  Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations , 1985 .

[66]  M. A. A. Kiefa.  GENERAL REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DRIVEN PILES IN COHESIONLESS SOILS , 1998 .

[67]  M. Randolph,et al.  Analysis of Deformation of Vertically Loaded Piles , 1978 .

[68]  A. T. C. Goh,et al.  Back-propagation neural networks for modeling complex systems , 1995, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[69]  Y. M. Najjar,et al.  Utilizing computational neural networks for evaluating the permeability of compacted clay liners , 1996 .

[70]  Theodore P. Lillys,et al.  Comparisons of Site Characterization Methods Using Mixed Data , 1996 .