Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis: Mayo Clinic Criteria

Background—Constrictive pericarditis is a potentially reversible cause of heart failure that may be difficult to differentiate from restrictive myocardial disease and severe tricuspid regurgitation. Echocardiography provides an important opportunity to evaluate for constrictive pericarditis, and definite diagnostic criteria are needed. Methods and Results—Patients with surgically confirmed constrictive pericarditis (n=130) at Mayo Clinic (2008–2010) were compared with patients (n=36) diagnosed with restrictive myocardial disease or severe tricuspid regurgitation after constrictive pericarditis was considered but ruled out. Comprehensive echocardiograms were reviewed in blinded fashion. Five principal echocardiographic variables were selected based on prior studies and potential for clinical use: (1) respiration-related ventricular septal shift, (2) variation in mitral inflow E velocity, (3) medial mitral annular e' velocity, (4) ratio of medial mitral annular e' to lateral e', and (5) hepatic vein expiratory diastolic reversal ratio. All 5 principal variables differed significantly between the groups. In patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (n=29), all but mitral inflow velocity remained significantly different. Three variables were independently associated with constrictive pericarditis: (1) ventricular septal shift, (2) medial mitral e', and (3) hepatic vein expiratory diastolic reversal ratio. The presence of ventricular septal shift in combination with either medial e'≥9 cm/s or hepatic vein expiratory diastolic reversal ratio ≥0.79 corresponded to a desirable combination of sensitivity (87%) and specificity (91%). The specificity increased to 97% when all 3 factors were present, but the sensitivity decreased to 64%. Conclusions—Echocardiography allows differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive myocardial disease and severe tricuspid regurgitation. Respiration-related ventricular septal shift, preserved or increased medial mitral annular e' velocity, and prominent hepatic vein expiratory diastolic flow reversals are independently associated with the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis.

[1]  Richard D. White,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. , 2013, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Mechanism of septal bounce in constrictive pericarditis: a simultaneous cardiac catheterisation and echocardiographic study , 2013, Heart.

[3]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Differentiation of tricuspid regurgitation from constrictive pericarditis: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory , 2009, Heart.

[4]  M. Frenneaux,et al.  Is it primarily tricuspid regurgitation, constriction or restriction? , 2009, Heart.

[5]  A. Tajik,et al.  Using mitral 'annulus reversus' to diagnose constrictive pericarditis. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Seward,et al.  Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy using mitral annular velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  J. Oh,et al.  Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Seward,et al.  Annulus Paradoxus: Transmitral Flow Velocity to Mitral Annular Velocity Ratio Is Inversely Proportional to Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Patients With Constrictive Pericarditis , 2001, Circulation.

[9]  J. Seward,et al.  Comparison of mitral inflow and superior vena cava Doppler velocities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and constrictive pericarditis. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  H. C. Kim,et al.  Assessment of mitral annulus velocity by Doppler tissue imaging in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R L Popp,et al.  Differentiation of Constrictive Pericarditis and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy by Doppler Echocardiography , 1989, Circulation.

[12]  N. Schiller,et al.  Septal bounce, vena cava plethora, and pericardial adhesion: informative two-dimensional echocardiographic signs in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction. , 1988, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[13]  C. Tei,et al.  Atrial systolic notch on the interventricular septal echogram: an echocardiographic sign of constrictive pericarditis. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  J. Seward,et al.  Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Ken W. Woodhouse,et al.  The Clinical Perspective , 1994 .