What Makes a Visualization Memorable?

An ongoing debate in the Visualization community concerns the role that visualization types play in data understanding. In human cognition, understanding and memorability are intertwined. As a first step towards being able to ask questions about impact and effectiveness, here we ask: 'What makes a visualization memorable?' We ran the largest scale visualization study to date using 2,070 single-panel visualizations, categorized with visualization type (e.g., bar chart, line graph, etc.), collected from news media sites, government reports, scientific journals, and infographic sources. Each visualization was annotated with additional attributes, including ratings for data-ink ratios and visual densities. Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk, we collected memorability scores for hundreds of these visualizations, and discovered that observers are consistent in which visualizations they find memorable and forgettable. We find intuitive results (e.g., attributes like color and the inclusion of a human recognizable object enhance memorability) and less intuitive results (e.g., common graphs are less memorable than unique visualization types). Altogether our findings suggest that quantifying memorability is a general metric of the utility of information, an essential step towards determining how to design effective visualizations.

[1]  Jonathan C. Roberts Display models: ways to classify visual representations , 2000 .

[2]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps , 2010 .

[3]  Wilma A. Bainbridge,et al.  The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Robert L. Harris,et al.  Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference , 1996 .

[5]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[6]  Steven Pinker,et al.  A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .

[7]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[8]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Towards a periodic table of visualization methods , 2007 .

[9]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[12]  Kim Marriott,et al.  Memorability of Visual Features in Network Diagrams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Irene Reppa,et al.  An Empirical Study on Using Visual Embellishments in Visualization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Jianxiong Xiao,et al.  What makes an image memorable , 2011 .

[15]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts , 2010, CHI.

[16]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  A Tour through the Visualization Zoo , 2010 .

[17]  Nigel Holmes Designer's Guide to Creating Charts and Diagrams , 1984 .

[18]  S. Kosslyn Understanding charts and graphs , 1989 .

[19]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[20]  Eytan Adar,et al.  Benefitting InfoVis with Visual Difficulties , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[21]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .

[23]  O. Neurath,et al.  From Hieroglyphics to Isotype: A Visual Autobiography , 2010 .

[24]  José Fernando Rodrigues,et al.  Reviewing Data Visualization: an Analytical Taxonomical Study , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[25]  Alberto Cairo,et al.  The Functional Art: An introduction to information graphics and visualization , 2012 .

[26]  Yuri Engelhardt,et al.  The Language of Graphics: A Framework for the Analysis of Syntax and Meaning in Maps, Charts and Diagrams , 2002, ILLC dissertation series.

[27]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Does metaphor increase visual language usability? , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[28]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[30]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[31]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Understanding the Intrinsic Memorability of Images , 2011, NIPS.

[32]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Scene Memory Is More Detailed Than You Think : The Role of Categories in Visual Long-Term Memory , 2010 .

[33]  B. Marx The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985 .

[34]  Thomas Grechenig,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Style in Information Visualization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[35]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Rethinking Visualization: A High-Level Taxonomy , 2004 .