The Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Program in Innsbruck, Austria, and the Impact of Such Programs on Lack of Donor Hearts in Europe

Strategy and results of the Innsbruck Mechanical Circulatory Support Program are presented, and the impact of such programs on pediatric heart transplantation (HTX) in Europe is discussed. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VADs) were used in 21 pediatric patients (median age 3.3 years, 2 days to 17 years) for acute heart failure (AHF) following a bridge or bridge-to-bridge strategy. Twelve patients were treated with vaECMO: eight were weaned after 2–10 days, two died, and two were switched to a VAD. Of the last, one was weaned 47 days later and the other underwent HTX 168 days later. In nine patients, VAD was implanted without preceding vaECMO. One such patient died (cerebral hemorrhage) after 236 days; of the remaining eight patients three were weaned and five underwent HTX. Waiting time for HTX (high-urgency status) varied from 4 to 372 days. Fifteen patients were discharged (follow up: 2–74 months); 14 are doing very well (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Class I, neurologically normal), whereas one suffers from severe neurologic damage, presumably from resuscitation before vaECMO. Data from Eurotransplant on pediatric HTX in 2004, 2005, and 2006 (33, 49, and 34 transplanted hearts, respectively; recipients <16 years of age) are discussed. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) substantially improves survival with AHF in pediatric patients. Medium-term support (up to 400 days in our patients) is possible and outcome of survivors is excellent. Wide spread use of MCS might slightly aggravate the lack of donor organs, which could result in longer support times.

[1]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Ventricular assist devices in children: Current achievements and future perspectives , 2007, Pediatric transplantation.

[2]  C. Hoermann,et al.  Outcome evaluation of the bridge-to-bridge concept in patients with cardiogenic shock. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  B. Duncan Matching the mechanical circulatory support device to the child with heart failure. , 2006, ASAIO journal.

[4]  C. Hoermann,et al.  Interventional and Medical Treatment of Acute Heart Failure Due to Inflammation , 2006, Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen.

[5]  L. Shekerdemian,et al.  Early experience with Levosimendan in children with ventricular dysfunction* , 2006, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[6]  P. Chetaille,et al.  Outcome of acute fulminant myocarditis in children , 2006, Heart.

[7]  S. Gandhi,et al.  Ventricular assist device support in children and adolescents as a bridge to heart transplantation. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Management of Pediatric Patients After Implantation of the Berlin Heart EXCOR Ventricular Assist Device , 2006, ASAIO journal.

[9]  D. Wessel Testing new drugs for heart failure in children. , 2006, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[10]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Evidence-based use of levosimendan in different clinical settings. , 2006, European heart journal.

[11]  J. Copeland,et al.  Pediatric bridge to heart transplantation: application of the Berlin Heart, Medos and Thoratec ventricular assist devices. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  B. Reichart,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support in infants and adults with the MEDOS/HIA assist device. , 2005, Artificial organs.

[13]  D. Farrar,et al.  Thoratec Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Patients: Update on Clinical Results , 2005, ASAIO journal.

[14]  C. Hoermann,et al.  Early detection and successful therapy of fulminant chlamydia pneumoniae myocarditis. , 2005, ASAIO journal.

[15]  R. Körfer,et al.  Mechanische Kreislaufunterstützung: 15 Jahre Erfahrung im Herzzentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen , 2004 .

[16]  C. Russo,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support in severe heart failure: single-center experience. , 2004, Transplantation proceedings.

[17]  R. Körfer,et al.  [Mechanical circulatory support: 15 years of experience in the Heart Center North Rhine-Westphalia]. , 2004, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[18]  C. Struthers,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support for adolescent patients: the Ottawa Heart Institute experience. , 2003, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[19]  Robert L Kormos,et al.  Long-term follow-up of Thoratec ventricular assist device bridge-to-recovery patients successfully removed from support after recovery of ventricular function. , 2002, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[20]  R. Bartlett,et al.  The use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients with primary cardiac failure as a bridge to implantable left ventricular assist device. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  G. Tenderich,et al.  Device and patient management in a bridge-to-transplant setting. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  R. Hruban,et al.  Long-term outcome of fulminant myocarditis as compared with acute (nonfulminant) myocarditis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  B. McCrindle,et al.  Clinical outcomes of acute myocarditis in childhood , 1999, Heart.