Phonology as Human Behavior: Applying Theory to the Clinic

Abstract This paper introduces the theory of Phonology as Human Behavior (PHB); summarizes the basic theoretical and methodological tenets of the theory; and shows how it has been used to analyze the combinatory phonology of various languages from diverse language families in general and developmental and clinical phonology in particular. The theory of PHB, developed by William Diver and his students of the Columbia School, combines aspects of the “communication factor” inherent in Prague School phonology with aspects of the “human factor” inherent in André Martinet's functional diachronic phonology. The major parameters of the theory are presented according to the Saussurean-based semiotic definition of language as a sign system used by human beings to communicate. The fundamental axiom underlying the theory is that language represents a compromise in the struggle to achieve maximum communication through minimal effort. The major contribution of the theory is that it provides a motivation to explain the nonrandom distribution of phonemes within the speech signal in language in general and in typical and atypical speech in particular.

[1]  Yishai Tobin,et al.  Semiotics and Linguistics , 1990 .

[2]  Ellen Contini-Morava,et al.  Meaning as explanation : advances in linguistic sign theory , 1995 .

[3]  R. Jakobson.  Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze , 1942 .

[4]  Nitza Geri,et al.  An Attention Economy Perspective on the Effectiveness of Incomplete Information , 2008, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[5]  H. Miyakoda.  Speech errors in normal and pathological speech: evidence from Japanese , 2003 .

[6]  Yishai Tobin.  Phonology as human behavior , 2011 .

[7]  S. Neumann,et al.  An Attention Economy Perspective on the Effectiveness of Incomplete Information , 2008 .

[8]  Yishai Tobin.  Phonology as Human Behavior: Theoretical Implications and Clinical Applications , 1997 .

[9]  ReviewSchools of linguistics: Geoffrey Sampson, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1980. 283 pp. $23.50. , 1986 .

[10]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[11]  Yishai Tobin.  Invariance, Markedness and Distinctive Feature Analysis: A contrastive study of sign systems in English and Hebrew , 1994 .

[12]  Ellen Contini-Morava,et al.  Cognitive and communicative approaches to linguistic analysis , 2004 .

[13]  Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk.  Constraints and preferences , 2001 .

[14]  Yishai Tobin,et al.  Between Grammar and Lexicon , 2000 .

[15]  J. Fisiak,et al.  Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics , 1990 .

[16]  Ben-Gurion.  COMPARING AND CONTRASTING NATURAL PHONOLOGY WITH THE THEORY OF PHONOLOGY AS HUMAN BEHAVIOR , 2007 .

[17]  Y. Tobin.  Structuralist Phonology: Prague School , 2006 .

[18]  P. Denes,et al.  The speech chain : the physics and biology of spoken language , 1963 .

[19]  Sociolinguistic Variation in the Intonation of Buenos Aires Spanish , 2008 .

[20]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Doing Optimality Theory , 2008 .

[21]  Yishai Tobin.  Phonology as human behavior: Inflectional systems in English , 2006 .

[22]  Y. Tobin.  Comparing and Contrasting Natural Phonology, Optimality Theory and the Theory of Phonology as Human Behavior , 2009 .

[23]  Nikolaj Sergejevič Trubeckoj.  Grundzüge der Phonologie , 1989 .

[24]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Postscript , 1852, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Comparing and contrasting Optimality Theory with the Theory of Phonology as Human Behavior , 2000 .

[26]  J. Ohala.  The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[27]  L. Adi-Bensaid,et al.  Consonant‐free words: Evidence from Hebrew speaking children with cochlear implants , 2009, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[28]  Yishai Tobin.  Phonology As Human Behavior: Initial Consonant Clusters Across Languages , 2002 .

[29]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[30]  G. Sampson.  Schools of Linguistics , 1980 .

[31]  Y. Tobin,et al.  A Laboratory Analysis ofSuprasegmental Features in Normal and Pathological Speech of Buenos AiresSpanish According to the Theory of Phonology as Human Behavior , 2006 .

[32]  F. D. Saussure.  Cours de linguistique générale , 1924 .

[33]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[34]  Y. Tobin,et al.  The signs B and B‐bent in Israeli sign language according to the theory of Phonology as Human Behavior , 2008, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[35]  Yishai Tobin,et al.  Looking at Sign Language as a Visual and Gestural Shorthand , 2008 .

[36]  Y. Tobin,et al.  ‘Non‐vocalization’: A phonological error process in the speech of severely and profoundly hearing impaired adults, from the point of view of the theory of phonology as human behaviour , 2008, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[37]  Paul Georg Meyer,et al.  Aspect in the English Verb: Process and Result in Language , 1993 .

[38]  A. Martinet.  Économie des changements phonétiques : traité de phonologie diachronique , 1957 .

[39]  Y. Tobin.  Developmental and clinical phonology: Roman Jakobson and beyond , 1997 .

[40]  Yishai Tobin,et al.  Between phonology and lexicon: The Hebrew triconsonantal (CCC) root system revolving around /r/ (C-r-C) , 2004 .

[41]  D. Stampe.  A dissertation on natural phonology , 1979 .

[42]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader , 2003 .

[43]  Kyoko Yamaguchi,et al.  Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data , 2010 .

[44]  Y. Tobin.  COMPARING AND CONTRASTING NATURAL PHONOLOGY , OPTIMALITY THEORY AND THE , 2009 .

[45]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[46]  Ricardo Otheguy,et al.  Signal, Meaning, and Message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics , 2002 .

[47]  Davis,et al.  Advances in Functional Linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins , 2006 .

[48]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Optimality Theory: An overview , 2003 .

[49]  Mitsuhiko Ota,et al.  Optimality Theory: an overview , 2000 .