Study protocol for the COvid-19 Toolbox for All IslaNd (CONTAIN) project: A cross-border analysis in Ireland to disentangle psychological, behavioural, media and governmental responses to COVID-19

COVID-19 represents a serious challenge to governments and healthcare systems. In addition to testing/contact tracing, behavioural and social responses such as handwashing and social distancing or cocooning are effective tools for mitigating the spread of the disease. Psychological (e.g., risk perceptions, self-efficacy) and contextual factors (government, public health messaging, etc.) are likely to drive these behaviours. Collated real-time information of these indicators strengthens local, national and international public health advice and messaging. Further, understanding how well public health and government messages and measures are understood, communicated via (social) media and adhered to is vital. There are two governments and public health jurisdictions on the island of Ireland, the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI). This represents an opportunity to explore implications of differing measures and messaging across these two jurisdictions as they relate to COVID-19 on two similar populations. The expert research team are drawn from a range of disciplines in the two countries. This project has four nested studies: Assessment of key behavioural, social and psychological factors through a large, prospective representative telephone survey of individuals aged over-18 on a weekly basis over eight weeks (n=3072); and conduct qualitative focus groups over the same period. Interrogation of social media messaging and formal media responses in both jurisdictions to investigate the spread of (mis)information. Modelling data from Studies 1 and 2, plotting the psychosocial/behavioural and media messaging information with international, ROI and NI incidence and mortality data. Conducting an assessment of health policy transfer in an attempt to incorporate the most significant public health and political insights from each jurisdiction. The CONTAIN project will develop an evidence-based toolbox for targeting public health messaging and political leadership and will be created for use for the anticipated second wave of COVID-19, and subsequently for future epidemics/pandemics.

[1]  Harish Gupta,et al.  COVID-19 updates , 2022, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[2]  E. van Ginneken,et al.  Who should be vaccinated first? Comparing vaccine prioritization strategies in Israel and European countries using the Covid-19 Health System Response Monitor , 2021, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research.

[3]  C. Napoli,et al.  A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  Minjung Lee,et al.  Psychological and Behavioral Responses in South Korea During the Early Stages of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  S. Kalichman,et al.  Social and behavioral health responses to COVID-19: lessons learned from four decades of an HIV pandemic , 2020, Journal of behavioral medicine.

[6]  D. Mobbs,et al.  Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States , 2020 .

[7]  Refugio en el Lugar,et al.  COVID-19 (Coronavirus). , 2020, Lymphatic research and biology.

[8]  H. Rothan,et al.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Journal of Autoimmunity.

[9]  Contain , 2020, Definitions.

[10]  Brian McCloskey,et al.  SARS to novel coronavirus – old lessons and new lessons , 2020, Epidemiology and Infection.

[11]  Weier Wang,et al.  Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019‐nCoV) in Wuhan, China , 2020, Journal of medical virology.

[12]  Hongzhou Lu,et al.  Drug treatment options for the 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV). , 2020, Bioscience trends.

[13]  Andrea du Toit,et al.  Outbreak of a novel coronavirus , 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[14]  Helene Joffe,et al.  Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines , 2020 .

[15]  Patrick Vinck,et al.  Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018-19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: a population-based survey. , 2019, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[16]  A. Nolan The Gay Community Response to the Emergence of AIDS in Ireland: Activism, Covert Policy, and the Significance of an “Invisible Minority” , 2017, Journal of Policy History.

[17]  F. Asplund,et al.  Contextual and psychosocial factors predicting Ebola prevention behaviours using the RANAS approach to behaviour change in Guinea-Bissau , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[18]  M. Taegtmeyer,et al.  Let’s not make the same mistake again: A political economy analysis of Sierra Leone’s Cholera and Ebola epidemic responses , 2016 .

[19]  J. Eaton,et al.  Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levels , 2016, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[20]  L. Leung Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research , 2015, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[21]  A. Kleczkowski,et al.  Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic , 2015, Psychology, health & medicine.

[22]  K. Dionne,et al.  International Political Economy and the 2014 West African Ebola Outbreak , 2015, African Studies Review.

[23]  S. Ratzan,et al.  Ebola Crisis—Communication Chaos We Can Avoid , 2014, Journal of health communication.

[24]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[25]  E. Kelloway,et al.  The stress (of an) epidemic. , 2012, Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.

[26]  J. Schunk,et al.  Should we fear "flu fear" itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[27]  S. Chapman,et al.  Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis , 2011, BMC public health.

[28]  K. Hunt,et al.  UK newspapers' representations of the 2009–10 outbreak of swine flu: one health scare not over-hyped by the media? , 2010, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[29]  B. Cowling,et al.  Community psychological and behavioral responses through the first wave of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in Hong Kong. , 2010, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[30]  E. Gould,et al.  Likely Correlation between Sources of Information and Acceptability of A/H1N1 Swine-Origin Influenza Virus Vaccine in Marseille, France , 2010, PloS one.

[31]  K. Kaiser,et al.  Problem-Driven Governance and Political Economy Analysis : Good Practice Framework , 2009 .

[32]  Erik von Elm,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[34]  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Patrick Monahan,et al.  Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[37]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[38]  T. Oliver The politics of public health policy. , 2006, Annual review of public health.

[39]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys , 2004, Research on aging.

[40]  David Alan Alexander,et al.  Biochemical terrorism: too awful to contemplate, too serious to ignore: subjective literature review. , 2003, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[41]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a Two-Item Depression Screener , 2003, Medical care.

[42]  G. Cornah The department of health , 1974, Postgraduate medical journal.

[43]  T. Hale,et al.  Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker , 2020 .

[44]  C. Newell Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus , 2000 .

[45]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .