论文信息 - Response to “Comments on ‘A Set of Analytical Benchmarks to Test Numerical Models of Flow and Transport in Soils’”

Response to “Comments on ‘A Set of Analytical Benchmarks to Test Numerical Models of Flow and Transport in Soils’”

The comments by [Groenendijk et al. (2006)][1] nicely illustrate the usefulness of analytical benchmarks for code developers to test and improve numerical models. These benchmarks may also be useful for model users to validate whether the numerical settings (e.g., space and time discretiztion,

[1] M. Vanclooster,et al. A Set of Analytical Benchmarks to Test Numerical Models of Flow and Transport in Soils , 2005 .

[2] T. Vogel,et al. On the reliability of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity calculated from the moisture retention curve , 1988 .

[3] R. Carsel,et al. Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[4] J. Wösten,et al. Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils , 1999 .

[5] Van Genuchten,et al. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[6] Joop G Kroes,et al. Comments on “A Set of Analytical Benchmarks to Test Numerical Models of Flow and Transport in Soils” , 2006 .