American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II: The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography
暂无分享,去创建一个
Johan H. C. Reiber | Gerhard Koning | Joan C. Tuinenburg | A. Zwinderman | J. Reiber | G. Koning | J. Tuinenburg | R. Simon | T. Becker | Aeilko H Zwinderman | E. Hekking | Ellen Hekking | Rüdiger Simon | Tim Becker
[1] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[2] Johan H. C. Reiber,et al. Comparison of accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arterial analysis between cinefilm and digital systems , 1994 .
[3] Cornelis H. Slump,et al. Assessment of image compression quality by means of quantitative coronary angiography , 1997, Medical Imaging.
[4] Gregory K. Wallace,et al. The JPEG still picture compression standard , 1991, CACM.
[5] R Brennecke,et al. Report of the ESC Task Force on Digital Imaging in Cardiology. Recommendations for digital imaging in angiocardiography. , 1994, European heart journal.
[6] U Bürgel,et al. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement Of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression. , 2000, European Heart Journal.
[7] Jan J. Gerbrands,et al. State of the Art in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography as of 1996 , 1996 .
[8] J. Reiber,et al. Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[9] Marcel Breeuwer,et al. Overlapped transform coding of medical x-ray images , 1994, Medical Imaging.
[10] B. Harrawood,et al. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.
[11] Johan H. C. Reiber,et al. Why and how should QCA systems be validated , 1994 .
[12] S. Silber,et al. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.
[13] Kenneth G. Morris,et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG Compression of Digital Coronary Angiograms Does Not Limit Detection of Subtle Morphological Features , 1996 .
[14] S E Nissen,et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.