American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II: The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography

Abstract OBJECTIVES This report describes whether lossy Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) image compression/decompression has an effect on the quantitative assessment of vessel sizes by state-of-the-art quantitative coronary arteriography (QCA). BACKGROUND The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) digital exchange standard for angiocardiography prescribes that images must be stored loss free, thereby limiting JPEG compression to a maximum ratio of 2:1. For practical purposes it would be desirable to increase the compression ratio (CR), which would lead to lossy image compression. METHODS A series of 48 obstructed coronary segments were compressed/decompressed at CR 1:1 (uncompressed), 6:1, 10:1 and 16:1 and analyzed blindly and in random order using the QCA-CMS analytical software. Similar catheter and vessel start- and end-points were used within each image quartet, respectively. All measurements were repeated after several weeks using newly selected start- and end-points. Three different sub-analyses were carried out: the intra-observer, fixed inter-compression and variable inter-compression analyses, with increasing potential error sources, respectively. RESULTS The intra-observer analysis showed significant systematic and random errors in the calibration factor at JPEG CR 10:1. The fixed inter-compression analysis demonstrated systematic errors in the calibration factor and recalculated vessel parameter results at CR 16:1 and for the random errors at CR 10:1 and 16:1. The variable inter-compression analysis presented systematic and random errors in the calibration factor and recalculated parameter results at CR 10:1 and 16:1. Any negative effect at CR 6:1 was found only for the calibration factor of the variable inter-compression analysis, which did not show up in the final vessel measurements. CONCLUSIONS Compression ratios of 10:1 and 16:1 affected the QCA results negatively and therefore should not be used in clinical research studies.

[1]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[2]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arterial analysis between cinefilm and digital systems , 1994 .

[3]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  Assessment of image compression quality by means of quantitative coronary angiography , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  The JPEG still picture compression standard , 1991, CACM.

[5]  R Brennecke,et al.  Report of the ESC Task Force on Digital Imaging in Cardiology. Recommendations for digital imaging in angiocardiography. , 1994, European heart journal.

[6]  U Bürgel,et al.  American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement Of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression. , 2000, European Heart Journal.

[7]  Jan J. Gerbrands,et al.  State of the Art in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography as of 1996 , 1996 .

[8]  J. Reiber,et al.  Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[9]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Overlapped transform coding of medical x-ray images , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[10]  B. Harrawood,et al.  Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Why and how should QCA systems be validated , 1994 .

[12]  S. Silber,et al.  Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.

[13]  Kenneth G. Morris,et al.  Lossy (15:1) JPEG Compression of Digital Coronary Angiograms Does Not Limit Detection of Subtle Morphological Features , 1996 .

[14]  S E Nissen,et al.  American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.