Designing features that influence decisions about sustainable products

Engineers make continuous effort to improve the sustainability of products, such as using sophisticated manufacturing approaches, conducting rigorous sustainability analysis, and including materials that decrease environmental impact. However, thoughtful sustainability efforts are sometimes hidden from customers, which are wasted sales features if customers do not know or value them. As green marketing messages are not always trusted, another approach is to communicate sustainability to the customer through the product’s visible features. This research proposes and tests a newly-created design technique that helps product designers communicate sustainability in the products they design and, in turn, helps customers to think about sustainability during purchase decisions. Three empirical studies, with designers and potential customers as subjects, are conducted. Study 1 in Chapter 3 proposes and tests a new design technique that uses psychological priming to help designers generate product features that communicate sustainability to the customer, termed as sustainability-triggering, or ST features. Priming is a psychological experimental technique that uses an artifact, exposure, or experience to stimulate cognitive accessibility of specific mental content. Here, priming is used prior to a design task. The author investigates primes of sensory-andsustainability-heightening activities, and compares these to existing primes and a control condition. The test primes are proven to be comparatively more effective in helping designers generate product features that communicate sustainability, as judged by both experts and customers.

[1]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice , 2009, CHI.

[2]  M. R. Solomon Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being , 1993 .

[3]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design , 2009 .

[4]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[5]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[6]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[7]  Beno Benhabib,et al.  Reliability Analysis of Non-Constant-Size Part Populations in Design for Remanufacture , 2000 .

[8]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling , 2003 .

[9]  Anja Dieckmann,et al.  Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[10]  Erin F. MacDonald,et al.  The construction of preference in engineering design and implications for green products , 2008 .

[11]  Jinjuan She,et al.  Priming Designers to Communicate Sustainability , 2012 .

[12]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Affective computational priming and creativity , 2011, CHI.

[13]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques , 2005 .

[14]  James M. Higgins 101 Creative Problem Solving Techniques: The Handbook of New Ideas for Business , 1994 .

[15]  L Eric,et al.  It ` s not easy being green : the effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice , 2013 .

[16]  Elizabeth M. Gerber Developing an Idea by Throwing it Away , 2008 .

[17]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  Preference Construction and Persistence in Digital Marketplaces: The Role of Electronic Recommendation Agents , 2001 .

[18]  Jinjuan She,et al.  Seven Cognitive Concepts for Successful Sustainable Design , 2012 .

[19]  James A. Roberts Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising , 1996 .

[20]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  End-of-life decision making with uncertain product return quantity , 2012 .

[21]  Min Ding,et al.  Unstructured Direct Elicitation of Decision Rules , 2011 .

[22]  P. Slovic,et al.  Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective , 1983 .

[23]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .

[24]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Conjoint Analysis, Related Modeling, and Applications , 2004 .

[25]  Roland Goetgeluk,et al.  Discussion and Directions for Future Research , 2011 .

[26]  Ajay K. Manrai,et al.  Simulation Experiments in Choice Simplification: The Effects of Task and Context on Forecasting Performance , 1998 .

[27]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[28]  Allison Amis Guyton,et al.  DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT SEMANTICS FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: A SUSTAINABLE DESIGNER'S GUIDE , 2006 .

[29]  Otto Rentz,et al.  Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement , 2001 .

[30]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  Affordances and Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2012 .

[31]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[32]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[33]  James H. Barnes,et al.  Ecoscale: A scale for the measurement of environmentally responsible consumers , 1995 .

[34]  Min Ding,et al.  Eliciting Preference for Complex Products: A Web-Based Upgrading Method , 2008 .

[35]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[36]  Cassandra Telenko,et al.  A Methodology for Identifying Environmentally Conscious Guidelines for Product Design , 2010 .

[37]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach , 1978, Oper. Res..

[38]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods , 2011 .

[39]  Caroline Oates,et al.  Sustainability: consumer perceptions and marketing strategies. , 2006 .

[40]  R. Marsh,et al.  Conceptual priming in a generative problem-solving task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[41]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[42]  David Wallace,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Ideas From Prolific, Early-Stage Product Ideation , 2010 .

[43]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  The construction of preferences for crux and sentinel product attributes , 2007 .

[44]  J. Bargh,et al.  Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions , 2010, Science.

[45]  T. Evgeniou,et al.  Disjunctions of Conjunctions, Cognitive Simplicity, and Consideration Sets , 2010 .

[46]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice , 2004 .

[47]  W. Laufer Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing , 2003 .

[48]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[49]  Keijiro Masui,et al.  Applying Quality Function Deployment to environmentally conscious design , 2003 .

[50]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Integrating Life Cycle Assessment Into the Conceptual Phase of Design Using a Design Repository , 2010 .

[51]  J. Orlin,et al.  “ MUST HAVE ” ASPECTS VS . TRADEOFF ASPECTS IN MODELS OF CUSTOMER DECISIONS , 2006 .

[52]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  A Comparison of Cognitive Heuristics Use between Engineers and Industrial Designers , 2010, DCC.

[53]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[54]  Jessica Lagerstedt,et al.  EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development , 2006 .

[55]  Clare D'Souza,et al.  Ecolabel programmes: a stakeholder (consumer) perspective , 2004 .

[56]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[57]  John R. Hauser,et al.  A Marketing Audit using a Conceptual Model of Consumer Behavior: Application and Evaluation , 1981 .

[58]  Troels Keldmann,et al.  Applying “Design for X” Experience in Design for Environment , 1996 .

[59]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[60]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[61]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk , 2008, CHI.

[62]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  A Conceptual Design Tool for Resolving Conflicts Between Product Functionality and Environmental Impact , 2010 .

[63]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  E-Waste Stream Analysis and Design Implications , 2011 .

[64]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[65]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues , 2008 .

[66]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[67]  A. Osborn Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[68]  H. Aarts,et al.  The Unconscious Will: How the Pursuit of Goals Operates Outside of Conscious Awareness , 2010, Science.

[69]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. , 2000 .

[70]  Jeremy J. Michalek Preference coordination in engineering design decision-making. , 2005 .

[71]  J. Bruner On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[72]  Chris Yuan,et al.  A Schematic Method for Sustainable Material Selection of Toxic Chemicals in Design and Manufacturing , 2010 .

[73]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Quantification of perceived environmental friendliness for vehicle silhouette design , 2010 .

[74]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Increasing Innovation: A Trilogy of Experiments Towards a Design-by-Analogy Method , 2007 .

[75]  Kai Sassenberg,et al.  Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming , 2005 .

[76]  J. Bargh,et al.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions , 2009 .

[78]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix , 2010 .

[79]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Design Team Convergence: The Influence of Example Solution Quality , 2009 .

[80]  J. Shah,et al.  Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch)--An Idea Generation Technique for Engineering Design. , 2001 .

[81]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Empathic Lead Users: The Effects of Extraordinary User Experiences on Customer Needs Analysis and Product Redesign , 2008 .

[82]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[83]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[84]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Multilevel design and role play: experiences in assessing support for neighborhood participation in design , 2002, DIS '02.

[85]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[86]  T. Rickards,et al.  Problem-solving through creative analysis , 1974 .

[87]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[88]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[89]  M. Kallio,et al.  Consumer preferences for sustainability and their impact on supply chain management: The case of mobile phones , 2013 .

[90]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[91]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Function Impact Matrix for Sustainable Concept Generation: A Designer’s Perspective , 2010 .

[92]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  “Collaborating To Success”: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques , 2005 .

[93]  P. Nedungadi Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[94]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review , 2010 .

[95]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[96]  L. Bird,et al.  Made with Renewable Energy: How and Why Companies are Labeling Consumer Products , 2012 .

[97]  Min Ding,et al.  NON-COMPENSATORY (AND COMPENSATORY) MODELS OF CONSIDERATION-SET DECISIONS , 2009 .

[98]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation , 2000, TCHI.

[99]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices , 2002 .

[100]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[101]  Joonas Rokka,et al.  Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices – Do consumers care? , 2008 .

[102]  George W. Woodruff,et al.  Incorporating Environmental Issues in Product Design and Realization , 1999 .

[103]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  A CONJUNCTIVE-COMPENSATORY APPROACH TO THE SELF-EXPLICATION OF MULTIATTRIBUTED PREFERENCES* , 1988 .

[104]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation , 2012 .

[105]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. , 1982 .

[106]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .