Interfacing electrogenic cells with 3D nanoelectrodes: position, shape, and size matter.

An in-depth understanding of the interface between cells and nanostructures is one of the key challenges for coupling electrically excitable cells and electronic devices. Recently, various 3D nanostructures have been introduced to stimulate and record electrical signals emanating from inside of the cell. Even though such approaches are highly sensitive and scalable, it remains an open question how cells couple to 3D structures, in particular how the engulfment-like processes of nanostructures work. Here, we present a profound study of the cell interface with two widely used nanostructure types, cylindrical pillars with and without a cap. While basic functionality was shown for these approaches before, a systematic investigation linking experimental data with membrane properties was not presented so far. The combination of electron microscopy investigations with a theoretical membrane deformation model allows us to predict the optimal shape and dimensions of 3D nanostructures for cell-chip coupling.

[1]  Christian Schmeiser,et al.  Actin branching in the initiation and maintenance of lamellipodia , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[2]  K. Mølhave,et al.  Mapping the Complex Morphology of Cell Interactions with Nanowire Substrates Using FIB-SEM , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Selecting deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies in advanced Parkinson’s disease: an evidence-based review , 2013, Journal of Neurology.

[4]  Micha E. Spira,et al.  Toward on-chip, in-cell recordings from cultured cardiomyocytes by arrays of gold mushroom-shaped microelectrodes , 2012, Front. Neuroeng..

[5]  U. Frey,et al.  Tracking axonal action potential propagation on a high-density microelectrode array across hundreds of sites , 2013, Nature Communications.

[6]  A. Offenhäusser,et al.  FIB section of cell-electrode interface , 2014 .

[7]  P. Fromherz,et al.  A neuron-silicon junction: a Retzius cell of the leech on an insulated-gate field-effect transistor. , 1991, Science.

[8]  Seifert,et al.  Adhesion of vesicles. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  A. Jackson,et al.  Receptor-mediated endocytosis , 1996 .

[10]  N. Melosh,et al.  Fusion of biomimetic stealth probes into lipid bilayer cores , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Fisher,et al.  Electrical devices for treatment of arrhythmias. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  M. Welch,et al.  Cytoskeleton: Actin and endocytosis — no longer the weakest link , 2001, Current Biology.

[13]  Bozhi Tian,et al.  Intracellular recordings of action potentials by an extracellular nanoscale field-effect transistor , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  J. Lahann,et al.  Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity. , 2012, Small.

[15]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[16]  Leonardo Sileo,et al.  Beam induced deposition of 3D electrodes to improve coupling to cells , 2012 .

[17]  J. Shappir,et al.  Changing gears from chemical adhesion of cells to flat substrata toward engulfment of micro-protrusions by active mechanisms , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  Kenneth A. Brakke,et al.  The Surface Evolver , 1992, Exp. Math..

[19]  Gabriel A. Silva,et al.  Neuroscience nanotechnology: progress, opportunities and challenges , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Aviad Hai,et al.  On-chip electroporation, membrane repair dynamics and transient in-cell recordings by arrays of gold mushroom-shaped microelectrodes. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[21]  H. Noguchi,et al.  Shape transitions of fluid vesicles and red blood cells in capillary flows. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  G. Gompper,et al.  Triangulated-Surface Models of Fluctuating Membranes , 2004 .

[23]  Elena P Ivanova,et al.  Biophysical model of bacterial cell interactions with nanopatterned cicada wing surfaces. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[24]  M. Kaksonen,et al.  Harnessing actin dynamics for clathrin-mediated endocytosis , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  Revathi Ananthakrishnan,et al.  The Forces Behind Cell Movement , 2007, International journal of biological sciences.

[26]  O. Pierre-Louis Adhesion of membranes and filaments on rippled surfaces. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  G. Borghs,et al.  Peptide-functionalized microfabricated structures for improved on-chip neuronal adhesion , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  G. Gompper,et al.  Wrapping of ellipsoidal nano-particles by fluid membranes , 2013, 1303.5567.

[29]  Jacob T. Robinson,et al.  Vertical nanowire electrode arrays as a scalable platform for intracellular interfacing to neuronal circuits. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[30]  J. Shappir,et al.  In-cell recordings by extracellular microelectrodes , 2010, Nature Methods.

[31]  L. Berdondini,et al.  Electrical coupling of mammalian neurons to microelectrodes with 3D nanoprotrusions , 2013 .

[32]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Biophysics of catch bonds. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[33]  Chong Xie,et al.  Noninvasive neuron pinning with nanopillar arrays. , 2010, Nano letters.

[34]  B. Cui,et al.  Intracellular Recording of Action Potentials by Nanopillar Electroporation , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[35]  J. Shappir,et al.  Long-term, multisite, parallel, in-cell recording and stimulation by an array of extracellular microelectrodes. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Nanotechnology for Cell–Substrate Interactions , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  N. Melosh,et al.  Nanostraws for direct fluidic intracellular access. , 2012, Nano letters.

[38]  G. Dagnelie Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field. , 2012, Current opinion in neurology.

[39]  N J Izzo,et al.  HL-1 cells: a cardiac muscle cell line that contracts and retains phenotypic characteristics of the adult cardiomyocyte. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Samuel A. Safran,et al.  Membrane-induced interactions between inclusions , 1993 .

[41]  W. Helfrich Elastic Properties of Lipid Bilayers: Theory and Possible Experiments , 1973, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Teil C: Biochemie, Biophysik, Biologie, Virologie.

[42]  A. Offenhäusser,et al.  Fabrication of gold micro-spine structures for improvement of cell/device adhesion , 2011 .

[43]  Matthew R Angle,et al.  Mechanical model of vertical nanowire cell penetration. , 2013, Nano letters.

[44]  Chong Xie,et al.  Characterization of the cell-nanopillar interface by transmission electron microscopy. , 2012, Nano letters.

[45]  M. Spira,et al.  Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[46]  A. Offenhäusser,et al.  On chip guidance and recording of cardiomyocytes with 3D mushroom-shaped electrodes. , 2013, Nano letters.

[47]  G. Gompper,et al.  Shape and orientation matter for the cellular uptake of nonspherical particles. , 2014, Nano letters.

[48]  Carmen Bartic,et al.  Spine-shaped gold protrusions improve the adherence and electrical coupling of neurons with the surface of micro-electronic devices , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[49]  J. Shappir,et al.  Improved Neuronal Adhesion to the Surface of Electronic Device by Engulfment of Protruding Micro-Nails Fabricated on the Chip Surface , 2007, TRANSDUCERS 2007 - 2007 International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference.

[50]  Nicholas A. Melosh,et al.  Gigaohm resistance membrane seals with stealth probe electrodes , 2010 .