Differential community and the perception of urban green spaces and their contents in the megacity of Karachi, Pakistan

[1]  S. Haq.  Islam and Ecology: Toward Retrieval and Reconstruction , 2013 .

[2]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  The fast growing megacity Karachi as a frontier of environmental challenges: Urbanization and contemporary urbanism issues , 2010 .

[3]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Green space functionality under conditions of uneven urban land use development , 2010 .

[4]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Prospects of Biodiversity in the Mega‐City of Karachi, Pakistan: Potentials, Constraints and Implications , 2010 .

[5]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Green Space Functionality Along an Urban Gradient in Karachi, Pakistan: A Socio-Ecological Study , 2010 .

[6]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Ecological disturbances due to high cutback in the green infrastructure of Karachi: Analyses of public perception about associated health problems , 2010 .

[7]  Cecil C. Konijnendijk,et al.  Reviewing eight years of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening: taking stock, looking ahead. , 2010 .

[8]  H. Groeneveld,et al.  Carbon sequestration estimates of indigenous street trees in the City of Tshwane, South Africa , 2010 .

[9]  A. Buijs,et al.  No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences , 2009 .

[10]  Nurdeng Deuraseh.  Maintaining a healthy environment : an Islamic ethical approach. , 2009 .

[11]  S. Lovell,et al.  Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? , 2009 .

[12]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities. Experiences from eastern Germany , 2008 .

[13]  J. Breuste,et al.  Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: a comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile and Spain. , 2008 .

[14]  M. Mcdonnell,et al.  The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  R. Kaplan,et al.  People needs in the urban landscape : Analysis of Landscape And Urban Planning contributions , 2008 .

[16]  L. H. Frivold,et al.  Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. , 2008 .

[17]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Culture, place and urban growth in the U.S. South , 2007, Urban Ecosystems.

[18]  A. Kaźmierczak,et al.  Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review , 2007 .

[19]  P. Travlou,et al.  Mapping research priorities for green and public urban space in the UK , 2007 .

[20]  Marie – Hélène Zérah,et al.  Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: The case of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Mumbai , 2007 .

[21]  H. Staats,et al.  Preference for Nature in Urbanized Societies: Stress, Restoration, and the Pursuit of Sustainability , 2007 .

[22]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services , 2007 .

[23]  Ian Mell,et al.  Green Infrastructure Planning: What are the costs for Health and Well-being? , 2007 .

[24]  R. Jongman,et al.  25 Years of Landscape Ecology: Scientific Principles in Practice , 2007 .

[25]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Scale Mismatches in Management of Urban Landscapes , 2006 .

[26]  Giuseppe Carrus,et al.  Comparison of two different approaches for assessing the psychological and social dimensions of green spaces , 2006 .

[27]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Residents’ Attitudes Toward Street Trees in the UK and U.S. Communities , 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[28]  G. Sanesi,et al.  Residents and urban green spaces: the case of Bari. , 2006 .

[29]  G. Cumming,et al.  Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions , 2006 .

[30]  Terry J. Brown,et al.  The Riverside and Berwyn experience: Contrasts in landscape structure, perceptions of the urban landscape, and their effects on people , 2006 .

[31]  Chi Yung Jim,et al.  Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China , 2006 .

[32]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Land-Use and Land-Cover Change , 2006 .

[33]  Lisa J. Graumlich,et al.  Global Land-Cover Change: Recent Progress, Remaining Challenges , 2006 .

[34]  James W. Varni,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation of healing gardens in a pediatric cancer center , 2005 .

[35]  M. Amati,et al.  Nature in the city, city in the nature: case studies of the restoration of urban nature in Tokyo, Japan and Toronto, Canada , 2005, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[36]  F. Mayer,et al.  The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature ☆ , 2004 .

[37]  Jürgen Breuste,et al.  Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development , 2004 .

[38]  A. Chiesura.  The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. , 2004 .

[39]  D. Dillman,et al.  How Urban Residents Rate and Rank the Benefits and Problems Associated with Trees in Cities , 2004, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[40]  Kirstin Dow,et al.  Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems , 2000, Urban Ecosystems.

[41]  Chi Yung Jim,et al.  Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing city, China , 2003 .

[42]  W. T. de Groot,et al.  Visions of nature and landscape type preferences : an exploration in the Netherlands , 2003 .

[43]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management , 2003 .

[44]  G. Tress,et al.  Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research , 2001 .

[45]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas , 2001 .

[46]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  W. Groot,et al.  The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in Western countries , 2001, Environmental Conservation.

[48]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Multiple Scales and the Maintenance of Biodiversity , 2000, Ecosystems.

[49]  Bongkoo Lee,et al.  A tale of three greenway trails: user perceptions related to quality of life , 2000 .

[50]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES TO URBAN AND URBANIZING LANDSCAPES , 2000 .

[51]  T. Randrup,et al.  Urban Forestry Research in Europe: An Overview , 2000, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[52]  V. Dokmeci,et al.  Residential-location preferences according to demographic characteristics in Istanbul , 2000 .

[53]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  A study of Bangalore urban forest , 2000 .

[54]  R. Brush,et al.  Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes , 2000 .

[55]  Marino Bonaiuto,et al.  MULTIDIMENSIONAL PERCEPTION OF RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT QUALITY AND NEIGHBOURHOOD ATTACHMENT IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT , 1999 .

[56]  G. Lindsey.  Use of urban greenways: insights from Indianapolis☆ , 1999 .

[57]  P. Bolund,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban areas , 1999 .

[58]  R. Webb.  LEARNING FROM URBAN FORESTRY PROGRAMMES IN SOUTH EAST ASIA , 1999 .

[59]  A. V. D. Berg.  Individual differences in the aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes , 1999 .

[60]  J. F. Coeterier,et al.  GROUP DIFFERENCES IN THE AESTHETIC EVALUATION OF NATURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH , 1998 .

[61]  Alejandro Flores,et al.  Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a greenspace system for the New York City region , 1998 .

[62]  M. R. Akhtar.  Towards an Islamic Approach for Environmental Balance , 1996 .

[63]  A. Kendle,et al.  Human Well-Being, Natural Landscapes and Wildlife in Urban Areas a Review , 1994 .

[64]  Terry Hartig,et al.  Nature experience in transactional perspective , 1993 .

[65]  E. Wilson,et al.  The biophilia hypothesis , 1993 .

[66]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[67]  T. Daniel.  Measuring the quality of the natural environment: A psychophysical approach. , 1990 .

[68]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[69]  Richard Smardon,et al.  Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation , 1988 .

[70]  Janet Frey Talbot,et al.  Ethnicity and Preference for Natural Settings: A Review and Recent Findings , 1988 .

[71]  R. Ulrich.  Human responses to vegetation and landscapes , 1986 .

[72]  R. Ulrich.  View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[73]  Michael Hough,et al.  City form and natural process , 1984 .

[74]  R. Ulrich.  Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment , 1983 .

[75]  F. Carp,et al.  Perceived environmental quality of neighborhoods: Development of assessment scales and their relation to age and gender , 1982 .

[76]  T. Daniel,et al.  Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method , 1976 .