An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Keltikangas-Järvinen,et al. Sleeping problems and health behaviors as mediators between organizational justice and health. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[2] J. Edwards. Construct validation in organizational behavior research. , 2003 .
[3] Tom R. Tyler,et al. Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? , 2002 .
[4] R. Wright,et al. Energy resource depletion, ability perception, and cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge. , 2002, Psychophysiology.
[5] S. West,et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.
[6] Marko Elovainio,et al. Team climate and procedural justice as predictors of occupational strain. , 2002 .
[7] Marko Elovainio,et al. Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. , 2002, American journal of public health.
[8] B. Tepper. Health Consequences of Organizational Injustice: Tests of Main and Interactive Effects , 2001 .
[9] Paul E. Spector,et al. The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .
[10] J. R. Aiello,et al. The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[11] Bradley J. Alge,et al. Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[12] M Kivimäki,et al. Organization justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[13] Donald E. Conlon,et al. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[14] Zinta S. Byrne,et al. Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .
[15] E. Lind. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. , 2001 .
[16] Jerald Greenberg,et al. Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .
[17] H. Wilke,et al. The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory , 2001 .
[18] Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al. Traditional and Electronic Monitoring from an Organizational Justice Perspective , 2000 .
[19] Tom R. Tyler,et al. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement , 2000 .
[20] K. A. Kovach,et al. Electronic communication in the workplace--something's got to give , 2000 .
[21] Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al. Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees' experiences with new types of surveillance , 2000 .
[22] Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al. Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions , 2000 .
[23] Edward Barrett,et al. Justice in the workplace , 1999 .
[24] Nerina L. Jimmieson,et al. Work control and employee well-being: A decade review , 1999 .
[25] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .
[26] E M Hallowell,et al. The human moment at work. , 1999, Harvard business review.
[27] G. Alder. Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives , 1998 .
[28] Brian P. Flaherty,et al. An Alternative Framework for Defining Mediation. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.
[29] G. Stoney Alder,et al. Electronic Performance Monitoring , 1997 .
[30] Richard G. Lomax,et al. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .
[31] Carl H. Botan. Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects , 1996 .
[32] Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al. Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance , 1996 .
[33] T. Tyler,et al. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. , 1996 .
[34] J. R. Aiello,et al. Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.
[35] S. Hawk. The effects of computerized performance monitoring: An ethical perspective , 1994 .
[36] Nathan Bennett,et al. Employee Reactions to Electronic Control Systems , 1994 .
[37] Debra L. Shapiro,et al. Explanations: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy , 1994 .
[38] Carol T. Kulik,et al. The Effect of Information Format and Performance Pattern on Performance Appraisal Judgments in a Computerized Performance Monitoring Context1 , 1994 .
[39] Julie A. Flanagan,et al. Restricting Electronic Monitoring in the Private Workplace , 1994 .
[40] J. Greenberg,et al. Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.
[41] J. Greenberg,et al. Organizational behavior : the state of the science , 1994 .
[42] Jeanne M. Brett,et al. Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice : a field study of mediation and arbitration , 1993 .
[43] B. Frey. Does Monitoring Increase Work Effort? The Rivalry with Trust and Loyalty , 1993 .
[44] Pascale Carayon,et al. Effect of Electronic Performance Monitoring on Job Design and Worker Stress: Review of the Literature and Conceptual Model , 1993 .
[45] Carol T. Kulik,et al. Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. , 1993 .
[46] Terri L. Griffith. Monitoring and Performance: A Comparison of Computer and Supervisor Monitoring , 1993 .
[47] D. Nebeker,et al. The Effects of Computer Monitoring, Standards, and Rewards on Work Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Stress1 , 1993 .
[48] J. R. Aiello,et al. Computer Monitoring of Work Performance: Extending the Social Facilitation Framework to Electronic Presence1 , 1993 .
[49] John R. Aiello,et al. Computer‐Based Work Monitoring: Electronic Surveillance and Its Effects , 1993 .
[50] A. Kluger,et al. Person- versus computer-mediated feedback , 1993 .
[51] Chang-tseh Hsieh,et al. Some Potential Applications of Artificial Neural Systems in Financial Management , 1993 .
[52] Robert A. Baron,et al. Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. , 1993 .
[53] M J Smith,et al. Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: a conceptual overview. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.
[54] D DiTecco,et al. Operator stress and monitoring practices. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.
[55] A. Westin,et al. Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.
[56] P Carayon,et al. Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.
[57] T. Tyler,et al. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .
[58] John S. Carroll,et al. Applied social psychology and organizational settings , 1991 .
[59] P. Earley,et al. Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments , 1990 .
[60] Gregory B. Northcraft,et al. The preservation of self in everyday life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry , 1990 .
[61] R. Lewicki. Research on Negotiation in Organizations , 1990 .
[62] T. Kochan,et al. COMPUTER-AIDED MONITORING: ITS INFLUENCE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AND TURNOVER , 1989 .
[63] T. Tyler. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. , 1989 .
[64] Philip M. Podsakoff,et al. Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance , 1989 .
[65] Jr. James R. Larson. The Dynamic Interplay Between Employees' Feedback-Seeking Strategies and Supervisors' Delivery of Performance Feedback , 1989 .
[66] Robert Folger,et al. Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice , 1989 .
[67] H. Klein,et al. An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation , 1989 .
[68] Christopher A. Higgins,et al. Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service , 1989 .
[69] Marcelline R. Fusilier,et al. Control in the workplace. , 1989 .
[70] Stewart L. Tubbs,et al. Handbook of Organizational Communication. , 1988 .
[71] Debra L. Shapiro,et al. Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. , 1988 .
[72] Larry L. Cummings,et al. Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict , 1988 .
[73] P. Earley,et al. Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry , 1988 .
[74] T. Tyler,et al. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .
[75] R. Baron,et al. Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.
[76] Marya L. Leatherwood,et al. Using Multiple Attributes to Assess Sources of Performance Feedback , 1987 .
[77] Y. Fried,et al. THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1987 .
[78] Paul Attewell,et al. Big brother and the sweatshop: computer surveillance in the automated office , 1987 .
[79] L. P. Cusella,et al. Feedback, motivation, and performance. , 1987 .
[80] R. Daft,et al. The information environments of organizations , 1987 .
[81] S. Ashford. Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .
[82] Christopher A. Higgins,et al. Computerized performance monitoring systems: use and abuse , 1986, CACM.
[83] J. Komaki. Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. , 1986 .
[84] B. Bannister,et al. Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .
[85] Jerald Greenberg,et al. Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations , 1986 .
[86] Richard L. Daft,et al. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .
[87] V. duRivage,et al. Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control , 1986 .
[88] C. Cooper,et al. International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .
[89] David B. Greenberger,et al. Development and Application of a Model of Personal Control in Organizations , 1986 .
[90] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[91] Jagdeep S. Chhokar,et al. A field study of the effect of feedback frequency on performance , 1984 .
[92] D. Ilgen,et al. Individual's reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective , 1984 .
[93] L. L. Cummings,et al. FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .
[94] L. P. Cusella,et al. THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE EXPERTISE AND FEEDBACK VALENCE ON INTRINSIC MOTIVATION , 1982 .
[95] C. Carver,et al. The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. , 1981 .
[96] R. H. Willis,et al. Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .
[97] E. A. Locke,et al. Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .
[98] E. Lind,et al. Procedure and Outcome Effects on Reactions to Adjudicated Resolution of Conflicts of Interest , 1980 .
[99] Martin M. Greller,et al. Evaluation of feedback sources as a function of role and organizational level. , 1980 .
[100] G. Leventhal. What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .
[101] M. Taylor,et al. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .
[102] Ederyn Williams,et al. Social and Psychological Factors , 1978 .
[103] J. Nunnally. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .
[104] J. Thibaut,et al. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .
[105] H. Lefcourt. The function of the illusions of control and freedom. , 1973, The American psychologist.
[106] J. Averill. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. , 1973 .