An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction

[1]  L. Keltikangas-Järvinen,et al.  Sleeping problems and health behaviors as mediators between organizational justice and health. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[2]  J. Edwards Construct validation in organizational behavior research. , 2003 .

[3]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? , 2002 .

[4]  R. Wright,et al.  Energy resource depletion, ability perception, and cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[5]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[6]  Marko Elovainio,et al.  Team climate and procedural justice as predictors of occupational strain. , 2002 .

[7]  Marko Elovainio,et al.  Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[8]  B. Tepper Health Consequences of Organizational Injustice: Tests of Main and Interactive Effects , 2001 .

[9]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  M Kivimäki,et al.  Organization justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .

[15]  E. Lind Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. , 2001 .

[16]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .

[17]  H. Wilke,et al.  The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory , 2001 .

[18]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Traditional and Electronic Monitoring from an Organizational Justice Perspective , 2000 .

[19]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement , 2000 .

[20]  K. A. Kovach,et al.  Electronic communication in the workplace--something's got to give , 2000 .

[21]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees' experiences with new types of surveillance , 2000 .

[22]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions , 2000 .

[23]  Edward Barrett,et al.  Justice in the workplace , 1999 .

[24]  Nerina L. Jimmieson,et al.  Work control and employee well-being: A decade review , 1999 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[26]  E M Hallowell,et al.  The human moment at work. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[27]  G. Alder Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives , 1998 .

[28]  Brian P. Flaherty,et al.  An Alternative Framework for Defining Mediation. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[29]  G. Stoney Alder,et al.  Electronic Performance Monitoring , 1997 .

[30]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[31]  Carl H. Botan Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects , 1996 .

[32]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance , 1996 .

[33]  T. Tyler,et al.  Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. , 1996 .

[34]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  S. Hawk The effects of computerized performance monitoring: An ethical perspective , 1994 .

[36]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Employee Reactions to Electronic Control Systems , 1994 .

[37]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Explanations: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy , 1994 .

[38]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  The Effect of Information Format and Performance Pattern on Performance Appraisal Judgments in a Computerized Performance Monitoring Context1 , 1994 .

[39]  Julie A. Flanagan,et al.  Restricting Electronic Monitoring in the Private Workplace , 1994 .

[40]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational behavior : the state of the science , 1994 .

[42]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice : a field study of mediation and arbitration , 1993 .

[43]  B. Frey Does Monitoring Increase Work Effort? The Rivalry with Trust and Loyalty , 1993 .

[44]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Effect of Electronic Performance Monitoring on Job Design and Worker Stress: Review of the Literature and Conceptual Model , 1993 .

[45]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. , 1993 .

[46]  Terri L. Griffith Monitoring and Performance: A Comparison of Computer and Supervisor Monitoring , 1993 .

[47]  D. Nebeker,et al.  The Effects of Computer Monitoring, Standards, and Rewards on Work Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Stress1 , 1993 .

[48]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Computer Monitoring of Work Performance: Extending the Social Facilitation Framework to Electronic Presence1 , 1993 .

[49]  John R. Aiello,et al.  Computer‐Based Work Monitoring: Electronic Surveillance and Its Effects , 1993 .

[50]  A. Kluger,et al.  Person- versus computer-mediated feedback , 1993 .

[51]  Chang-tseh Hsieh,et al.  Some Potential Applications of Artificial Neural Systems in Financial Management , 1993 .

[52]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. , 1993 .

[53]  M J Smith,et al.  Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: a conceptual overview. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[54]  D DiTecco,et al.  Operator stress and monitoring practices. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[55]  A. Westin,et al.  Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[56]  P Carayon,et al.  Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[57]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[58]  John S. Carroll,et al.  Applied social psychology and organizational settings , 1991 .

[59]  P. Earley,et al.  Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments , 1990 .

[60]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  The preservation of self in everyday life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry , 1990 .

[61]  R. Lewicki Research on Negotiation in Organizations , 1990 .

[62]  T. Kochan,et al.  COMPUTER-AIDED MONITORING: ITS INFLUENCE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AND TURNOVER , 1989 .

[63]  T. Tyler The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. , 1989 .

[64]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance , 1989 .

[65]  Jr. James R. Larson The Dynamic Interplay Between Employees' Feedback-Seeking Strategies and Supervisors' Delivery of Performance Feedback , 1989 .

[66]  Robert Folger,et al.  Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice , 1989 .

[67]  H. Klein,et al.  An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation , 1989 .

[68]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service , 1989 .

[69]  Marcelline R. Fusilier,et al.  Control in the workplace. , 1989 .

[70]  Stewart L. Tubbs,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication. , 1988 .

[71]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. , 1988 .

[72]  Larry L. Cummings,et al.  Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict , 1988 .

[73]  P. Earley,et al.  Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry , 1988 .

[74]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[75]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  Marya L. Leatherwood,et al.  Using Multiple Attributes to Assess Sources of Performance Feedback , 1987 .

[77]  Y. Fried,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[78]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Big brother and the sweatshop: computer surveillance in the automated office , 1987 .

[79]  L. P. Cusella,et al.  Feedback, motivation, and performance. , 1987 .

[80]  R. Daft,et al.  The information environments of organizations , 1987 .

[81]  S. Ashford Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .

[82]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Computerized performance monitoring systems: use and abuse , 1986, CACM.

[83]  J. Komaki Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. , 1986 .

[84]  B. Bannister,et al.  Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .

[85]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations , 1986 .

[86]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[87]  V. duRivage,et al.  Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control , 1986 .

[88]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[89]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Development and Application of a Model of Personal Control in Organizations , 1986 .

[90]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[91]  Jagdeep S. Chhokar,et al.  A field study of the effect of feedback frequency on performance , 1984 .

[92]  D. Ilgen,et al.  Individual's reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective , 1984 .

[93]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[94]  L. P. Cusella,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE EXPERTISE AND FEEDBACK VALENCE ON INTRINSIC MOTIVATION , 1982 .

[95]  C. Carver,et al.  The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. , 1981 .

[96]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[97]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[98]  E. Lind,et al.  Procedure and Outcome Effects on Reactions to Adjudicated Resolution of Conflicts of Interest , 1980 .

[99]  Martin M. Greller,et al.  Evaluation of feedback sources as a function of role and organizational level. , 1980 .

[100]  G. Leventhal What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .

[101]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[102]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Social and Psychological Factors , 1978 .

[103]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[104]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[105]  H. Lefcourt The function of the illusions of control and freedom. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[106]  J. Averill Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. , 1973 .