Timing of gene expression in a cell‐fate decision system

During development, morphogens provide extracellular cues allowing cells to select a specific fate by inducing complex transcriptional programs. The mating pathway in budding yeast offers simplified settings to understand this process. Pheromone secreted by the mating partner triggers the activity of a MAPK pathway, which results in the expression of hundreds of genes. Using a dynamic expression reporter, we quantified the kinetics of gene expression in single cells upon exogenous pheromone stimulation and in the physiological context of mating. In both conditions, we observed striking differences in the timing of induction of mating‐responsive promoters. Biochemical analyses and generation of synthetic promoter variants demonstrated how the interplay between transcription factor binding and nucleosomes contributes to determine the kinetics of transcription in a simplified cell‐fate decision system.

[1]  M. Rose,et al.  Kar4p, a karyogamy-specific component of the yeast pheromone response pathway , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[2]  Shelley Lane,et al.  Regulation of Mating and Filamentation Genes by Two Distinct Ste12 Complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  R. Yu,et al.  Fus3 generates negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast pheromone response , 2008, Nature.

[4]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[5]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Regulation of Yeast G Protein Signaling by the Kinases That Activate the AMPK Homolog Snf1 , 2013, Science Signaling.

[6]  V. Mackay,et al.  A yeast operator overlaps an upstream activation site , 1987, Cell.

[7]  M. Tyers,et al.  Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates , 1997, Current Biology.

[8]  G. Ammerer,et al.  H3K4 monomethylation dictates nucleosome dynamics and chromatin remodeling at stress-responsive genes , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  G. Ammerer,et al.  Controlling gene expression in response to stress , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[10]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Coordinate control of gene expression noise and interchromosomal interactions in a MAPK pathway , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  Steven A. Harvey,et al.  Visualisation and Quantification of Morphogen Gradient Formation in the Zebrafish , 2009, PLoS biology.

[12]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Single cells can sense their position in a morphogen gradient. , 1999, Development.

[13]  G F Sprague,et al.  Pheromone response elements are necessary and sufficient for basal and pheromone-induced transcription of the FUS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[14]  S. Pelet,et al.  New families of single integration vectors and gene tagging plasmids for genetic manipulations in budding yeast , 2016, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[15]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Control of Cdc28 CDK1 by a stress-induced lncRNA. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[16]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Direct and continuous assessment by cells of their position in a morphogen gradient , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Kenneth Evan Thompson,et al.  SYNZIP Protein Interaction Toolbox: in Vitro and in Vivo Specifications of Heterospecific Coiled-Coil Interaction Domains , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[18]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .

[19]  J. Skotheim,et al.  Spatial and temporal signal processing and decision making by MAPK pathways , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Checkpoints in a Yeast Differentiation Pathway Coordinate Signaling during Hyperosmotic Stress , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[21]  I. Sadowski,et al.  Organizational constraints on Ste12 cis‐elements for a pheromone response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[22]  Eulàlia de Nadal,et al.  Multilayered control of gene expression by stress‐activated protein kinases , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[23]  E. O’Shea,et al.  cis Determinants of Promoter Threshold and Activation Timescale. , 2015, Cell reports.

[24]  M. Levine,et al.  Dpp signaling thresholds in the dorsal ectoderm of the Drosophila embryo. , 2000, Development.

[25]  Serge Pelet,et al.  Dynamic single cell measurements of kinase activity by synthetic kinase activity relocation sensors , 2015, BMC Biology.

[26]  Reinhard Dechant,et al.  An integrated image analysis platform to quantify signal transduction in single cells. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[27]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Role of Transcription Factor Kar4 in Regulating Downstream Events in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pheromone Response Pathway , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  F. Cross,et al.  Ste12 and Mcm1 regulate cell cycle-dependent transcription of FAR1 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  E. O'Duibhir.  Stochastic Gene Expression , 2010 .

[30]  Kristin R Brogaard,et al.  A base pair resolution map of nucleosome positions in yeast , 2012, Nature.

[31]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Single-cell dynamics and variability of MAPK activity in a yeast differentiation pathway , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Briscoe,et al.  A gradient of Gli activity mediates graded Sonic Hedgehog signaling in the neural tube. , 2005, Genes & development.

[33]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  S. Pelet,et al.  Real-time quantification of protein expression at the single-cell level via dynamic protein synthesis translocation reporters , 2016, Nature Communications.

[35]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. , 2000, Science.

[36]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[37]  James Briscoe,et al.  Interpretation of the sonic hedgehog morphogen gradient by a temporal adaptation mechanism , 2007, Nature.

[38]  Andreas Doncic,et al.  Distinct interactions select and maintain a specific cell fate. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[39]  Nico Stuurman,et al.  Computer Control of Microscopes Using µManager , 2010, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[40]  E. Segal,et al.  In pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  Mike Tyers,et al.  A Mechanism for Cell-Cycle Regulation of MAP Kinase Signaling in a Yeast Differentiation Pathway , 2007, Cell.