Prospective Teachers' Comprehension Levels of Special Relativity Theory and the Effect of Writing for Learning on Achievement

In the present study, the comprehension levels of special relativity theory in prospective teachers who take the Introduction to Modern Physics lesson in the faculty of education science teaching department and the effect of writing for learning on their achievement is researched. In the research, a control group pre-test post-test quasiexperimental research model was used. Research data were obtained by using open-ended questions prepared by the researcher. The lesson was conducted in the beginning by using the verbal-written explanation method. Then each student in the experimental group wrote a summary which clearly explains the special relativity theory for a high school student within the framework of the writing for learning activity. By contrast, the control group students solved the problems related to the subject in the course book. A total of 73 students (51 female and 22 male) studying at the second grade in the 2011-2012 academic year participated in the study. The research findings showed that the comprehension levels of special relativity theory in prospective teachers were low; the result obtained by the qualitative and quantitative comparison of the post-test results of the experimental and control groups and their achievement percentage in the exam were in favor of the experimental group. Furthermore, 87.2% of the students who wrote down their opinions about the activity of writing for learning understood the special relativity theory; and the activity of writing for learning was effective in learning the special relativity theory.

[1]  R. Duschl,et al.  Learning Introductory Quantum Physics: Sensori‐motor experiences and mental models , 2005 .

[2]  David Russell,et al.  Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History , 1991 .

[3]  Stanley B. Straw,et al.  The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study , 2000 .

[4]  Wolfgang Christian,et al.  Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics , 2006 .

[5]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[6]  George E. Newell Learning from Writing in Two Content Areas: A Case Study/Protocol Analysis. , 1984 .

[7]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Aspects of an Educational Learning Theory , 1990 .

[8]  Gren Ireson,et al.  The quantum understanding of pre-university physics students , 2000 .

[9]  Perry D. Klein Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn , 1999 .

[10]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[11]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Writing and conceptual change. What changes? , 2000 .

[12]  Joan C. Condravy,et al.  Writing Across the Curriculum: An Annotated Bibliography. , 1983 .

[13]  Arthur Beiser,et al.  Concepts of modern physics , 1965 .

[14]  M. Bauer,et al.  Mapping variety in public understanding of science , 1993 .

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Writing across the Disciplines: Research into Practice. , 1987 .

[16]  James Britton,et al.  The development of writing abilities , 1975 .

[17]  James Britton,et al.  Prospect and Retrospect: Selected Essays of James Britton , 1986 .

[18]  The Level of Understanding of the Photoelectric Phenomenon in Prospective Teachers and the Effects of "Writing with Learning" on their Success Rates * , 2011 .

[19]  P. Tipler,et al.  Physics for scientists and engineers : with modern physics , 2008 .

[20]  B. Hand,et al.  Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Biotechnology: Writing to a Younger Audience , 2004 .

[21]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  How Writing Shapes Thinking: A Study of Teaching and Learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22. , 1987 .

[22]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. , 1991 .

[23]  Ayhan Yilmaz,et al.  Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının karışımların yapısı ve iletkenliği konusundaki kavram yanılgıları , 2005 .

[24]  C. Mayer,et al.  Shaping at the point of utterance: an investigation of the composing processes of the deaf student writer. , 1999, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[25]  J. Hayes,et al.  The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem. , 1980 .

[26]  Türk Fen,et al.  Prospective Teachers' Levels of Understanding Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and the Impact of Writing Activities for Learning Purposes on Academic Success , 2011 .

[27]  Ece Zehir Topkaya Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri Güncelleştirilmiş 5. Baskı , 2013 .

[28]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3 , 1994 .

[29]  H. R. Davis,et al.  Applied Social Research , 1978 .

[30]  Margot Soven,et al.  Writing Across the Curriculum : A Guide to Developing Programs , 1992 .

[31]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students' learning experiences during an experiment , 1998 .

[32]  Ö. Özcan,et al.  Öğrencilerin Bakış Açısıyla Kuantum Fiziği: Nitel Çalışma , 2008 .

[33]  Azam Mashhadi,et al.  Insights into students' understanding of quantum physics: visualizing quantum entities , 1999 .

[34]  Daniel F. Styer,et al.  Common misconceptions regarding quantum mechanics , 1996 .