The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Guyatt,et al. Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[2] G. Guyatt,et al. Interpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPD , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.
[3] H. Doll,et al. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[4] A. Griffiths,et al. Development, validation, and evaluation of a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index: a prospective multicenter study. , 2007, Gastroenterology.
[5] G. Guyatt,et al. How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients? , 2007, Quality of Life Research.
[6] C. Terwee,et al. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach , 2006, Quality of Life Research.
[7] R. Hays,et al. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.
[8] A. Lajoie,et al. The minimal clinically important difference of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale. , 2006, The Journal of hand surgery.
[9] John D. Childs,et al. Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients with Low Back Pain , 2005, Spine.
[10] G. Guyatt,et al. Measurement Properties and Interpretability of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) , 2005, COPD.
[11] G. Guyatt,et al. A randomised trial to evaluate the self-administered standardised chronic respiratory questionnaire , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.
[12] D. Streiner. Clinimetrics vs. psychometrics: an unnecessary distinction. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[13] G. Guyatt,et al. A comparison of the original chronic respiratory questionnaire with a standardized version. , 2003, Chest.
[14] Ross D Crosby,et al. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[15] G. Norman,et al. Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life: The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation , 2003, Medical care.
[16] J. Brazier,et al. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.
[17] A. Griffiths,et al. Pediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index: Responsive to Short-term Change , 2003, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.
[18] C. Terwee,et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness? , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[19] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. , 2002, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[20] D. Beaton,et al. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.
[21] D. Cella,et al. What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[22] J. Hazes,et al. Comparative responsiveness of four elbow scoring instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.
[23] G. Guyatt,et al. Relation of Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches in Interpretation of Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life , 2001, Medical care.
[24] G. Guyatt,et al. PMI25: THE RELATION OF DISTRIBUTION-AND ANCHOR-BASED APPROACHES ON INTERPRETATION OF CHANGES IN HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE , 2001 .
[25] K. Bruynesteyn,et al. Robustness and generalizability of smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.
[26] S. van der Linden,et al. Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage over 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results of a validation study with clinical experts. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.
[27] M. Lassere,et al. Foundations of the minimal clinically important difference for imaging. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.
[28] D. Beaton,et al. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. , 2000, Spine.
[29] M. Ward,et al. Identification of clinically important changes in health status using receiver operating characteristic curves. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[30] F D Wolinsky,et al. Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.
[31] W. Arrindell,et al. Establishing clinically significant change: increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis. , 1999, Behaviour research and therapy.
[32] W. Tierney,et al. Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[33] W M Tierney,et al. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. , 1999, Medical care.
[34] G. Samsa,et al. Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status Measures , 1999, PharmacoEconomics.
[35] P. Stratford,et al. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2. , 1998, Physical therapy.
[36] G H Guyatt,et al. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. , 1998, Physical therapy.
[37] P. Stratford,et al. Measurement Properties of the RM‐18: A Modified Version of the Roland‐Morris Disability Scale , 1997, Spine.
[38] G. Guyatt,et al. First-line treatment of seasonal (ragweed) rhinoconjunctivitis. A randomized management trial comparing a nasal steroid spray and a nonsedating antihistamine. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[39] G. Guyatt,et al. On the debate over methods for estimating the clinically important difference. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[40] G. Guyatt,et al. Interpretation of rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire data. , 1996, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.
[41] P. Stratford,et al. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. , 1996, Physical therapy.
[42] A. Beurskens,et al. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments , 1996, Pain.
[43] C. McHorney,et al. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? , 1995, Quality of Life Research.
[44] M. Eliasziw,et al. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. , 1994, Physical therapy.
[45] A R Feinstein,et al. A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[46] C. Sherbourne,et al. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .
[47] J T Boyle,et al. Development and validation of a pediatric Crohn's disease activity index. , 1991, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.
[48] N. Jacobson,et al. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
[49] G. Guyatt,et al. Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in rhinoconjunctivitis , 1991, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
[50] M. Liang,et al. Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation , 1990, Medical care.
[51] G. Guyatt,et al. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.
[52] Lewis E. Kazis,et al. Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.
[53] D. Altman,et al. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.
[54] A. Beckett,et al. AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.
[55] John D. Childs,et al. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[56] W. Tierney,et al. Changes in the SF-36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disadvantaged older adults. , 1998, Medical care.
[57] D. Osoba,et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[58] G H Guyatt,et al. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[59] Ware J.E.Jr.,et al. THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .
[60] R A Deyo,et al. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.