The influence of design variables and environmental factors on life-cycle cost assessment of concrete culverts

The objective of this article is to evaluate the influence of material, structural design variables and exposure conditions on the service life and cost effectiveness of precast concrete culverts in Canada. This investigation will assist practicing engineers to account for long-term performance and integrate life cycle analysis into design and construction decisions. The design variables considered in this study include the percentage of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as cement replacement, reinforcing steel cover depth and culvert size. This study proposes the usage of a life-cycle cost assessment approach to compare different culvert designs on an economic basis which accounts for the design variables and the impact of CO2 production and uptake over the life of a culvert from cradle to grave. Analysis of each culvert scenario includes the cost of the initial production of CO2 during the manufacturing process as well as the cost savings that were incurred due to the uptake of CO2 through carbonation processes. Overall, the present cost of the culverts is controlled by the GGBFS content and the reinforcing steel cover depth while carbonation processes have a relatively small economic impact.

[1]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Concrete Bridge Deck Applications , 2008 .

[2]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Optimizing Bridge Network Maintenance Management under Uncertainty with Conflicting Criteria: Life-Cycle Maintenance, Failure, and User Costs , 2006 .

[3]  Thomas J. Wonsiewicz.  Life Cycle Cost Analysis Discount Rates and Inflation , 1990 .

[4]  Harold E. Marshall,et al.  The economics of new-technology materials:: a case study of FRP bridge decking , 1996 .

[5]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  Evaluating the financial performance of bank branches , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Claus Pade,et al.  Carbon dioxide uptake in demolished and crushed concrete , 2005 .

[7]  Claus Pade,et al.  The CO2 Uptake of Concrete in a 100 Year Perspective , 2007 .

[8]  B. Lagerblad.  Carbon Dioxide Uptake during Concrete Life Cycle - State of the Art , 2005 .

[9]  Duncan Herfort,et al.  Sustainable Development and Climate Change Initiatives , 2008 .

[10]  P. K. Mehta,et al.  Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials , 2005 .

[11]  V. M. Malhotra,et al.  Eighth Canmet/Aci International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete , 2004 .

[12]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  The effects of economic and policy incentives on carbon mitigation technologies , 2006 .

[13]  Mo Shing Cheung,et al.  Life cycle cost management of concrete structures relative to chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion , 2010 .

[14]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Optimum Lifetime Planning of Bridge Inspection and Repair Programs , 1999 .

[15]  K Babaei,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS FOR PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION OF CONCRETE BRIDGES RELATIVE TO REINFORCEMENT CORROSION , 1994 .

[16]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Cost-Reliability Interaction in Life-Cycle Cost Optimization of Deteriorating Structures , 2004 .

[17]  Peter Utgenannt,et al.  The influence of ageing on the salt-frost resistance of concrete , 2004 .

[18]  John Nyboer,et al.  Methodological contrasts in costing greenhouse gas abatement policies: Optimization and simulation modeling of micro-economic effects in Canada , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Timothy L. Johnson,et al.  Fossil electricity and CO2 sequestration: how natural gas prices, initial conditions and retrofits determine the cost of controlling CO2 emissions , 2004 .

[20]  Michael Yit Lin Chew,et al.  Integration of durability with structural design: An optimal life cycle cost based design procedure for reinforced concrete structures , 2009 .

[21]  Dimitri V. Val,et al.  Life-cycle cost analysis of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments , 2003 .