What are good R&D investment strategies for leaders and followers?

Research and development (R&D) investment affects the growth of firms in the same industry differently according to their technological positions. This study empirically investigates differences in how R&D investment influences firm growth between technological leaders and followers. Additionally, this study investigates the moderating effects of complementary assets and market competition on the relationship between R&D investment and firm growth. Using a sample of 2322 observations from 492 firms in the U.S. chemical and allied products industry for the period 2000–2009, we show that an increase in R&D investment leads to greater firm growth for technological followers than for technological leaders. We also find that the moderating effects of complementary assets and market competition vary depending on whether a firm is a technological leader or follower.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Complementary Assets as Pipes and Prisms: Innovation Incentives and Trajectory Choices , 2012 .

[2]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[3]  Graham K. Morbey.  R&D Expenditures and Profit Growth , 1989 .

[4]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[5]  W. Bogner,et al.  Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance:Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment , 2000 .

[6]  Byungchae Jin,et al.  DO LEADING OR LAGGING FIRMS LEARN MORE FROM EXPORTING , 2010 .

[7]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Flexibility in Strategic Decision Making: Informational and Ideological Perspectives , 1997 .

[8]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[9]  David M Levinson,et al.  First Mover Advantages , 2011 .

[10]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  In with the old, in with the new: capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios , 2009 .

[11]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  ENTRY, GIBRAT'S LAW, INNOVATION, AND THE GROWTH OF FIRMS , 1962 .

[12]  Akhtar Siddique,et al.  An Examination of Long-Term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance Following R&D Increases , 2004 .

[13]  William G. Egelhoff.  Information-processing Theory and the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[14]  M. Ju,et al.  Behind organizational slack and firm performance in China: The moderating roles of ownership and competitive intensity , 2009 .

[15]  Hiroyuki Odagiri,et al.  R & D Expenditures, Royalty Payments, and Sales Growth in Japanese Manufacturing Corporations , 1983 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Conflict Resolution: A Cognitive Perspective , 2000 .

[17]  Kannan Ramaswamy,et al.  Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm performance: An empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector , 2001 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[19]  K. Sutcliffe.  What Executives Notice: Accurate Perceptions in Top Management Teams , 1994 .

[20]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs , 2009 .

[21]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[22]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[23]  David S. Evans.  Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition and Growth: Reconciling Theory and Evidence , 2005 .

[25]  J. Sutton.  Gibrat's Legacy , 1996 .

[26]  Alex Coad,et al.  Appropriate business strategy for leaders and laggards , 2011 .

[27]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[28]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[29]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  Gibrat's Law: Are the Services Different? , 2004 .

[30]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[31]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[33]  Justin Tan,et al.  Organizational Slack and Firm Performance During Economic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy , 2003 .

[34]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[35]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[36]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Impact of R&D Investment on Productivity - New Evidence Using Linked R&D-Lrd Data , 1989 .

[37]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[38]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[39]  S. Kotha,et al.  Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry , 1995 .

[40]  T. Devinney,et al.  The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value of Firms , 1993 .

[41]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  The effect of CEO pay deviations on CEO withdrawal, firm size, and firm profits , 2009 .

[42]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance , 2000 .

[43]  Haiyang Li,et al.  R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure , 2007 .

[44]  L. G. Thomas.  The Two Faces of Competition: Dynamic Resourcefulness and the Hypercompetitive Shift , 1996 .

[45]  Jane W. Lu,et al.  Technological knowledge, product relatedness, and parent control: The effect on IJV survival , 2007 .

[46]  A. McGahan,et al.  Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value , 2006 .

[47]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Knowledge flows and the modelling of the multinational enterprise , 2007 .

[48]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy , 1996 .

[49]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry , 1993 .

[50]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives , 2000 .

[51]  Danielle Bertrand-Cloodt,et al.  The strength of R&D network ties in high-tech sectors – a multi-dimensional analysis of the effects of tie strength on innovation performance , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[52]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  An Economic Theory of Intentional Torts , 1981 .

[53]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  Is ‘Do What You Do Best and Outsource the Rest’ an Appropriate Technology Sourcing Strategy? , 2007 .

[54]  Magnus Blomström.  Foreign Investment and Spillovers , 1989 .

[55]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Productivity in China's high technology industry: Regional heterogeneity and R&D , 2011 .

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[57]  João Leitão,et al.  Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-tech SMEs , 2012 .

[58]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[59]  Jiatao Li,et al.  CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion , 2010 .

[60]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[61]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Contingencies within Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Interdependent Effects of Resource Investment and Deployment on Firm Performance , 2009 .

[62]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[63]  K. Meyer.  Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies , 2004 .