Accuracy and reliability of facial soft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography.

It is important to have accurate and reliable measurements of soft tissue thickness for specific landmarks of the face and scalp when producing a facial reconstruction. In the past several methods have been created to measure facial soft tissue thickness (FSTT) in cadavers and in the living. The conventional spiral CT is mostly used to determine the FSTT but is associated with high radiation doses. The cone beam CT (CBCT) is a relatively new computer tomography system that focuses on head and neck regions and has much lower radiation doses. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy and reliability of CBCT scans to measure the soft tissue thicknesses of the face. Seven cadaver heads were used. Eleven soft tissue landmarks were identified on each head and a punch hole was made on each landmark using a dermal biopsy punch. The seven cadaver heads were scanned in the CBCT with 0.3 and 0.4mm resolution. The FSTT at the 11 different sites (soft tissue landmarks) were measured using SimPlant-ortho volumetric software. These measurements were compared to the physical measurements. Statistical analysis for the reliability was done by means of the interclass coefficient (ICC) and the accuracy by means of the absolute error (AE) and absolute percentage error (APE). The intra-observer (0.976-0.999) and inter-observer (0.982-0.997) correlations of the CBCT and physical measurements were very high. There was no clinical significant difference between the measurements made on the CBCT images and the physical measurements. Increasing the voxel size from 0.4 to 0.3mm resulted in a slight increase of accuracy. Cone beam CT images of the face using routine scanning protocols are reliable for measuring soft tissue thickness in the facial region and give a good representation of the facial soft tissues. For more accurate data collection the 0.3mm voxel size should be considered.

[1]  A G Hannam,et al.  Imaging orofacial tissues by magnetic resonance. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[2]  S. Brooks,et al.  Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  A. Hannam,et al.  Discussions and recommendations of breakout sessions , 2003 .

[4]  Frederik Gelaude,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. , 2009, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[5]  P Sukovic,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[6]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  R. Ward,et al.  The affect of tissue depth variation on craniofacial reconstructions. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[8]  L. Oesterhelweg,et al.  Cervical soft tissue imaging using a mobile CBCT scanner with a flat panel detector in comparison with corresponding CT and MRI data sets. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  I H El-Mehallawi,et al.  Ultrasonic assessment of facial soft tissue thicknesses in adult Egyptians. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[10]  V M Phillips,et al.  Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[11]  W. M. Krogman.  The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[12]  W A Aulsebrook,et al.  Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[13]  P. B. Baker,et al.  The rapid determination of cocaine and other local anesthetics using field tests and chromatography. , 1979, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  Allan G Farman,et al.  Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  W A Aulsebrook,et al.  Facial soft-tissue thicknesses in the adult male Zulu. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[16]  André Mol,et al.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  Miet Loubele,et al.  Semi-automated ultrasound facial soft tissue depth registration: method and validation. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  K. Taylor.  Forensic Art and Illustration , 2000 .

[19]  Robert M. George,et al.  The Lateral Craniographic Method of Facial Reconstruction , 1987 .

[20]  Sanjeev,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness in northwest Indian adults. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[21]  André Mol,et al.  Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. , 2007 .

[22]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[23]  J. Rhine,et al.  Thickness of facial tissues in American blacks. , 1980, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  Jae Bum Lee,et al.  Accuracy of facial soft tissue thickness measurements in personal computer-based multiplanar reconstructed computed tomographic images. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[25]  John Prag.  Making Faces , 2019, The Emoji Revolution.

[26]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Forensic Facial Reconstruction , 2004 .