CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF SIX-SIGMA IMPLEMENTATION: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS BASED STUDY

Six-Sigma is a well-established and one of the most recognized approaches in manufacturing strategy development. Companies who have adopted and successfully implemented such a methodology were found to be more innovative which led to increased customer satisfaction and an improved bottom line. The aim of this study is to identify factors for successful Six-Sigma implementation by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The study involves four phases, which include: (1) assessment of potential factors and performance measures in Six-Sigma implementation (2) development of the problem structure and building the AHP model (3) soliciting and compilation of opinion on preferences through expert interviews, and (4) determination of critical success factors. Twenty-one experts, consisting of three-project champions and eighteen-black belts from five multinational companies located in Thailand, were interviewed. Expert Choice® software was used to compute the normalized and unique priority weights. The results of the data analysis determined the relative importance of individual factors, and in turn identified the critical factors on which organizations should consolidate their efforts in the process of implementing Six-Sigma methodology.

[1]  Melvin Alexander,et al.  Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations , 2001, Technometrics.

[2]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  J. Antony,et al.  Six sigma in small‐ and medium‐sized UK manufacturing enterprises: Some empirical observations , 2005 .

[4]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective , 2003 .

[5]  Sarah Ingle,et al.  Six sigma black belt implementation , 2001 .

[6]  The Six Sigma Revolution , 2002 .

[7]  Cheryl Hild,et al.  A DISCUSSION OF STRATEGIES FOR SIX SIGMA* IMPLEMENTATION , 2000 .

[8]  James R. Evans,et al.  Successful implementation of Six Sigma: benchmarking General Electric Company , 2000 .

[9]  C. C. Waid,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models , 1982 .

[10]  M. J. Harry,et al.  SIX SIGMA : A BREAKTHROUGH STRATEGY FOR PROFITABILITY , 1998 .

[11]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organisations , 2002 .

[12]  Pete S. Pande,et al.  What Is Six Sigma , 2001 .

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  J. Alavalapati,et al.  Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT–AHP method , 2004 .

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Logic of Priorities , 1982 .

[16]  Leading Six Sigma , 2004 .

[17]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program , 2002 .

[18]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance , 2000 .

[19]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Design for six sigma: a breakthrough business improvement strategy for achieving competitive advantage , 2002 .

[20]  W. Denk.  Six Sigma the “Breakthrough Management Strategy”? , 2005 .

[21]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Going from six sigma to design for six sigma: an exploratory study using analytic hierarchy process , 2003 .

[22]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Six Sigma in the software industry: results from a pilot study , 2004 .

[23]  S. Ward,et al.  Analytical Planning — The Organisation of Systems , 1987 .

[24]  T. V. D. Wiele,et al.  Marginalisation of quality: Is there a case to answer? , 2000 .

[25]  Managing Six Sigma , 2001 .

[26]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach , 2006 .

[27]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .