Experimental aspects of Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness testing of fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites

Abstract Research on fracture mechanics has yielded a number of different test set-ups for determining the critical fracture toughness of fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix (FRP) composite materials under tensile/opening (Mode I), in-plane shear (Mode II), and anti-plane shear/torsion (Mode III) loads, as well as for mixed mode loads I/II. Test procedures for Mode I and Mode II critical fracture toughness testing of unidirectional FRP-composites are currently being evaluated for international standardisation. This paper discusses recent developments with the emphasis on experimental aspects of fracture toughness testing of FRP-composites in Mode I and Mode II. Experimental determination of the critical fracture toughness of FRP-composites involves a number of issues. Most activities to date have aimed at reducing in-laboratory and inter-laboratory variation to “reasonable” bounds (typical coefficient of variation 10–20%) when testing identical material. Specifically, the following problems will be addressed and discussed: (1) the type of starter crack or delamination starter, (2) the definition of delamination initiation from an existing crack, (3) the distribution and number of data points used in the analysis, (4) the accuracy of the experimental data, and (5) validation criteria for test method and data. Beyond the specific technical issues mentioned above, there are more general issues that relate to the applicability of the test procedures. So far, some of these issues have received little attention. A crucial point is the definition of the scope of the procedure, but differences in interpretation and realisation of the procedures by the operator are also important. From the point of view of the users of FRP-composites, general experimental aspects, such as, e.g., the simplicity of the test procedure and the availability of test set-ups, as well as the time needed for test preparation, performance, and analysis (which translate directly into cost), and the applicability of the procedures to engineering materials will gain in importance, once the technical test problems have been resolved.

[1]  K E Jackson,et al.  Advanced waveform-based acoustic emission detection of matrix cracking in composites , 1995 .

[2]  Peter Davies,et al.  An experimental study to validate tests used to determine mixed mode failure criteria of glass/epoxy composites , 1997 .

[3]  A. Gibson,et al.  Coupon Tests of Fibre Reinforced Plastics at Elevated Temperatures in Offshore Processing Environments , 1998 .

[4]  K. Arakawa,et al.  Study of mode I interlaminar fracture in CFRP laminates by moiré interferometry , 1994 .

[5]  M. Farshad,et al.  Investigation of mode III fracture toughness using an anti-clastic plate bending method , 1998 .

[6]  C. Roy,et al.  Monitoring progression of mode II delamination during fatigue loading through acoustic emission in laminated glass fiber composite , 1988 .

[7]  Otmar Kolednik,et al.  Determination of the fracture toughness by automatic image processing , 1996 .

[8]  K. Arakawa,et al.  Interlaminar fracture analysis of composite DCB specimens , 1996 .

[9]  Peter Davies,et al.  Standard Test Methods for Delamination Resistance of Composite Materials: Current Status , 1998 .

[10]  Rh Martin,et al.  Round Robin Testing for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Composite Materials , 1993 .

[11]  Kiyoshi Tanaka,et al.  COMPARISON OF TEST CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF GIIC : RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL ROUND ROBIN , 1999 .

[12]  O. Ishai,et al.  Interlaminar fracture toughness and toughening of laminated composite materials: a review , 1989 .

[13]  U. Hansen,et al.  Dependence of intralaminar fracture toughness on direction of crack propagation in unidirectional composites , 1998 .

[14]  J. Li,et al.  Simplified Data Reduction Methods for the ECT Test for Mode III Interlaminar Fracture Toughness , 1996 .

[15]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Delamination toughness computation for curved thermoplastic composites , 1994 .

[16]  T. O'brien,et al.  Interlaminar fracture toughness: the long and winding road to standardization , 1998 .

[17]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  Mixed-Mode Fracture in Fiber-Polymer Composite Laminates , 1991 .

[18]  W. Cantwell,et al.  A study of skin-core adhesion in glass fibre reinforced sandwich materials , 1996 .

[19]  M. Hojo,et al.  Prestandardization study on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness test for cfrp in japan , 1995 .