Influencing transport behaviour: a Bayesian modelling approach for segmentation of social surveys

Current approaches for understanding and influencing transport behaviour often involve creating fixed, homogenous groups of similar surveyed individuals in order to explore specific behavioural profiles, an approach known as segmentation. Most commonly, segmentation is not based on a formal statistical model, but either a simple ‘a priori’ defined group classification narrative, failing to capture the complexity of varying group characteristics, or a ‘post hoc’ heuristic cluster analysis, applied to multidimensional behavioural variables, creating complex descriptive group narratives. Here, we present an alternative, Bayesian finite mixture-modelling approach. A clear group narrative is created by constraining the Bayesian prior to group survey respondents based on the predominance of a single apposing transport behaviour, while a detailed insight into the behavioural complexity of each group is achieved using regression on multiple additional survey questions. Rather than assuming within group homogeneity, this creates a dynamic group structure, representing individual level probabilities of group membership and within group apposing travel behaviours. This approach also allows for numerical and graphical representation of the characteristics of these dynamic, clearly defined groups, providing detailed quantitative insight that would be unachievable using existing segmentation approaches. We present an application of this methodology to a large online commuting behaviour survey undertaken in the city of Exeter, UK. Survey respondents are grouped based on which transport mode type they predominantly commute by, and the key drivers of these predominant behaviours are modelled to inform the design of behavioural interventions to reduce commuter congestion in Exeter. Our approach allows us to prioritise the most effective intervention themes, and quantify their potential effect on motor vehicle usage. For example, we identify that individuals that predominantly commute by public transport, but also sometimes motor vehicle, do so on average up to one day per week less often, if they are strongly concerned about the environment, demonstrating how an intervention to promote environmental awareness could greatly reduce motor vehicle usage within this group.

[1]  D. Pfeffermann The Role of Sampling Weights when Modeling Survey Data , 1993 .

[2]  Joachim Scheiner,et al.  Does the car make elderly people happy and mobile? Settlement structures, car availability and leisure mobility of the elderly , 2006, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[3]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  An exploration of stated preferences for middle-distance travel , 2011 .

[4]  Jeff Gill,et al.  Bayesian Methods : A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach , 2002 .

[5]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability Distributions , 2005 .

[6]  W. Brög,et al.  Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences from three continents , 2009 .

[7]  Tim Ryley,et al.  Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh , 2006 .

[8]  B. Mallick VARIABLE SELECTION FOR REGRESSION MODELS , 2016 .

[9]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Green travellers? Exploring the spatial context of sustainable mobility styles , 2012 .

[10]  Mark Whitehead,et al.  Greening the brain: the pro-environmental behaviour change agenda: On the Rise of the Psychological State , 2013 .

[11]  R. O’Hara,et al.  A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which , 2009 .

[12]  Come Etienne,et al.  Model-Based Count Series Clustering for Bike Sharing System Usage Mining: A Case Study with the Vélib’ System of Paris , 2014 .

[13]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling , 2007, 0710.5005.

[14]  Sonja Haustein,et al.  Identifying target groups for environmentally sustainable transport: assessment of different segmentation approaches , 2013 .

[15]  M. Betancourt,et al.  Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Hierarchical Models , 2013, 1312.0906.

[16]  John Clarke,et al.  Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services , 2007 .

[17]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[18]  Jillian Anable,et al.  'Complacent Car Addicts' or 'Aspiring Environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory , 2005 .

[19]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .

[20]  J. Kruschke What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  A. Gelman,et al.  Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut? , 2005 .

[22]  Andrew B. Whitford Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach , 2003, Journal of Politics.

[23]  Daniel A. Grijfith Statistical Techniques in Geographical Analysis , 1985 .

[24]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[25]  Geert Wets,et al.  Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: profiling travelers using Q-methodology , 2009 .

[26]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  “I can do perfectly well without a car!” , 2011 .

[27]  Scott M. Lynch,et al.  Introduction to Applied Bayesian Statistics and Estimation for Social Scientists , 2007 .