The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted migration of branchial neural crest cells

BACKGROUND During vertebrate head development, neural crest cells migrate from hindbrain segments to specific branchial arches, where they differentiate into distinct patterns of skeletal structures. The rostrocaudal identity of branchial neural crest cells appears to be specified prior to migration, so it is important that they are targeted to the correct destination. In Xenopus embryos, branchial neural crest cells segregate into four streams that are adjacent during early stages of migration. It is not known what restricts the intermingling of these migrating cell populations and targets them to specific branchial arches. Here, we investigated the role of Eph receptors and ephrins-mediators of cell-contact-dependent interactions that have been implicated in neuronal pathfinding-in this targeted migration. RESULTS Xenopus EphA4 and EphB1 are expressed in migrating neural crest cells and mesoderm of the third arch, and third plus fourth arches, respectively. The ephrin-B2 ligand, which interacts with these receptors, is expressed in the adjacent second arch neural crest and mesoderm. Using truncated receptors, we show that the inhibition of EphA4/EphB1 function leads to abnormal migration of third arch neural crest cells into second and fourth arch territories. Furthermore, ectopic activation of these receptors by overexpression of ephrin-B2 leads to scattering of third arch neural crest cells into adjacent regions. Similar disruptions occur when the expression of ephrin-B2 or truncated receptors is targeted to the neural crest. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that the complementary expression of EphA4/EphB1 receptors and ephrin-B2 is involved in restricting the intermingling of third and second arch neural crest and in targeting third arch neural crest to the correct destination. Together with previous work showing that Eph receptors and ligands mediate neuronal growth cone repulsion, our findings suggest that similar mechanisms are used for neural crest and axon pathfinding.

[1]  Rüdiger Klein,et al.  Telling Axons Where to Grow: A Role for Eph Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Guidance , 1995, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[2]  Edoardo Boncinelli,et al.  A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head , 1991, Nature.

[3]  T. Sargent,et al.  Disruption of cell adhesion in Xenopus embryos by Pagliaccio, an Eph-class receptor tyrosine kinase. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[4]  Pierre Chambon,et al.  A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene , 1993, Cell.

[5]  S. Fraser,et al.  Vital dye analysis of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo. , 1992, Development.

[6]  A. Pandey,et al.  Cell Signalling: Receptor orphans find a family , 1995, Current Biology.

[7]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  A receptor protein tyrosine kinase implicated in the segmental patterning of the hindbrain and mesoderm. , 1992, Development.

[8]  S. Sisodiya,et al.  Interactions between neurites and somite cells: inhibition and stimulation of nerve growth in the chick embryo. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[9]  A. Flenniken,et al.  Distinct and overlapping expression patterns of ligands for Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinases during mouse embryogenesis. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[10]  A. Lumsden,et al.  Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. , 1996, Development.

[11]  S. Moody,et al.  Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[12]  T. Pawson,et al.  Immunolocalization of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. , 1994, Oncogene.

[13]  B. Sadaghiani,et al.  Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[14]  S. Ziegler,et al.  Embryo brain kinase: a novel gene of the eph/elk receptor tyrosine kinase family , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[15]  T Pawson,et al.  Unified Nomenclature for Eph Family Receptors and Their Ligands, the Ephrins , 1997, Cell.

[16]  S. Fraser,et al.  Rhombomeric origin and rostrocaudal reassortment of neural crest cells revealed by intravital microscopy. , 1995, Development.

[17]  S. Fraser,et al.  Segmental migration of trunk neural crest: time-lapse analysis reveals a role for PNA-binding molecules. , 1995, Development.

[18]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo , 1996, Cell.

[19]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Several receptor tyrosine kinase genes of the Eph family are segmentally expressed in the developing hindbrain , 1994, Mechanisms of Development.

[20]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Function of the Eph-related kinase rtk1 in patterning of the zebrafish forebrain , 1996, Nature.

[21]  J Walter,et al.  Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro. , 1987, Development.

[22]  R. S. Goldstein,et al.  Normal segmentation and size of the primary sympathetic ganglia depend upon the alternation of rostrocaudal properties of the somites. , 1991, Development.

[23]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map , 1995, Cell.

[24]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Transmembrane Ligands for Eph Receptors , 1997, Science.

[25]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. , 1995, Development.

[26]  Stephen W. Wilson,et al.  Regulatory gene expression boundaries demarcate sites of neuronal differentiation in the embryonic zebrafish forebrain , 1994, Neuron.

[27]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases , 1995, Cell.

[28]  D M Noden,et al.  The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[29]  A. Graham,et al.  Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. , 1991, Development.

[30]  Chaya Kalcheim,et al.  Consequences of somite manipulation on the pattern of dorsal root ganglion development. , 1989, Development.

[31]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  The structure and expression of the Xenopus Krox-20 gene: conserved and divergent patterns of expression in rhombomeres and neural crest , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[32]  T. Sargent,et al.  Pagliaccio, a member of the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinase genes, has localized expression in a subset of neural crest and neural tissues in Xenopus laevis embryos , 1994, Mechanisms of Development.

[33]  J. Flanagan,et al.  ELF-2, a new member of the Eph ligand family, is segmentally expressed in mouse embryos in the region of the hindbrain and newly forming somites , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  A. Schnapp,et al.  Membrane‐bound LERK2 ligand can signal through three different Eph‐related receptor tyrosine kinases. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[35]  S. Jesuthasan.  Contact inhibition/collapse and pathfinding of neural crest cells in the zebrafish trunk. , 1996, Development.

[36]  Scales Jb,et al.  Novel members of the eph receptor tyrosine kinase subfamily expressed during Xenopus development. , 1995 .

[37]  C. Renaud,et al.  Novel members of the eph receptor tyrosine kinase subfamily expressed during Xenopus development. , 1995, Oncogene.

[38]  S. Fraser,et al.  Segmental migration of the hindbrain neural crest does not arise from its segmental generation. , 1993, Development.

[39]  Moisés Mallo,et al.  Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest , 1993, Cell.

[40]  R. Perris,et al.  The role of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions in the morphogenesis of the neural crest. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[41]  T. Pawson,et al.  Nuk Controls Pathfinding of Commissural Axons in the Mammalian Central Nervous System , 1996, Cell.

[42]  C. Erickson,et al.  Glycoconjugates mark a transient barrier to neural crest migration in the chicken embryo. , 1994, Development.

[43]  T. Pawson,et al.  Biological and biochemical activities of a chimeric epidermal growth factor-Elk receptor tyrosine kinase , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[44]  T Pawson,et al.  Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. , 1994, Science.

[45]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Eph Family Transmembrane Ligands Can Mediate Repulsive Guidance of Trunk Neural Crest Migration and Motor Axon Outgrowth , 1997, Neuron.

[46]  Stephen W. Wilson,et al.  Spatially regulated expression of three receptor tyrosine kinase genes during gastrulation in the zebrafish. , 1994, Development.

[47]  S. Fraser,et al.  Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration , 1997, Current Biology.

[48]  A. Flenniken,et al.  Eph Receptors and Ligands Comprise Two Major Specificity Subclasses and Are Reciprocally Compartmentalized during Embryogenesis , 1996, Neuron.

[49]  J. Fawcett,et al.  The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[50]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF‐1 in guiding retinal axons , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[51]  M. Bronner‐Fraser.  Mechanisms of neural crest cell migration , 1993, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[52]  J M Slack,et al.  Fate map for the 32-cell stage of Xenopus laevis. , 1987, Development.

[53]  T. Pawson,et al.  Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands , 1996, Nature.