Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques.

PURPOSE To assess the diagnostic performance and reader agreement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) display techniques for detecting colorectal polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS A test set of 30 colonic segments was developed from spiral CT colonographic studies (12 with polyps and 18 without). The 12 segments with polyps contained 22 lesions (11 polyps <10 mm, 11 polyps or cancers >/=10 mm), with all findings verified with colonoscopy. Three specific 2D and 3D image-display techniques were tested. Three experienced abdominal radiologists independently analyzed each test case and were retested 6 weeks later. RESULTS The results of readings 1 and 2 were similar for all image-display techniques among the readers. Pooled segment results were sensitivity of 89%-92% and specificity of 72%-83%. Pooled polyp size results for sensitivity and positive predictive value were 77%-86% and 74%-86% (all polyps, n = 22), 91%-100% and 85%-100% (polyps or cancers >10 mm, n = 11), and 61%-73% and 61%-80% (polyps 5-9 mm, n = 11), respectively. Overall intraobserver agreement was good for the three display techniques (kappa, 0.60-1.00); however, interobserver agreement for 2D multiplanar reformation was lower (kappa, 0.53-0.80). CONCLUSION Among experienced abdominal radiologists, similar diagnostic performance in polyp detection was found among 2D multiplanar reformation and 3D display techniques, although individual cases showed improved characterization with 3D display techniques. Evaluation of reader agreement demonstrated good intraobserver agreement, with variable interobserver agreement.

[1]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[2]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication. , 1995, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[3]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G Wang,et al.  Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  K. Kopecky,et al.  An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy) , 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  S D Wall,et al.  The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy: current status and future implications. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[8]  A. Hara,et al.  Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): A New Method for Detecting Colorectal Neoplasms , 1997, Endoscopy.

[9]  E G McFarland,et al.  Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J R Hecht,et al.  CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R. Ehman,et al.  Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  W. Lees,et al.  Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  A. Hara,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  Kay Cl,et al.  A review of the technical and clinical aspects of virtual endoscopy. , 1996 .

[17]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. , 1999, Radiology.

[18]  K R Hoffmann,et al.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  V Argiro,et al.  Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[20]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  Thomas K. Pilgram,et al.  Spiral CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): multiobserver study of different image display techniques compared to colonoscopy , 1999, Medical Imaging.