Memory for pantomimed actions versus actions with real objects

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  E Donchin,et al.  Studies of Squeezing: Handedness, Responding Hand, Response Force, and Asymmetry of Readiness Potential , 1974, Science.

[3]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[4]  Peter Burke,et al.  Log-linear models , 1980 .

[5]  W. P. Dixon,et al.  BMPD statistical software manual , 1988 .

[6]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[7]  A. Damasio.  Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[8]  K M Heilman,et al.  Three-dimensional computergraphic analysis of apraxia. Neural representations of learned movement. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. , 1993, Science.

[11]  L. Jakobson,et al.  Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  N. Motomura,et al.  A Case of Ideational Apraxia with Impairment of Object Use and Preservation of Object Pantomime , 1994, Cortex.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[14]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Involvement of Primary Motor Cortex in Motor Imagery: A Neuromagnetic Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  C. Petten,et al.  Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Networks of domain-specific and general regions involved in episodic memory for spatial location and object identity , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  David A. Westwood,et al.  Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Mental representations of movements. Brain potentials associated with imagination of eye movements , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  B. Ska,et al.  Selective impairment of transitive gestures: An unusual case of apraxia , 1999 .

[26]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Memory for drawings in locations: spatial source memory and event-related potentials. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[27]  E. Tulving,et al.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Cubelli,et al.  Cognition in Action: Testing a Model of Limb Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  I Law,et al.  Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition A PET Study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  S. Petersen,et al.  Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J. Moll,et al.  Functional MRI correlates of real and imagined tool-use pantomimes , 2000, Neurology.

[33]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[34]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Transperceptual Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Memory: A PET Study of Visual and Haptic Objects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[36]  T. Fukutake,et al.  Apraxia of Tool Use: An Autopsy Case of Biparietal Infarction , 2002, European Neurology.

[37]  H. Müller-Gärtner,et al.  Brain systems engaged in encoding and retrieval of word-pair associates independent of their imagery content or presentation modalities , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  When Action Turns into Words. Activation of Motor-Based Knowledge during Categorization of Manipulable Objects , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Episodic action memory: Characterization of the time course and neural circuitry , 2002 .

[40]  John E Desmond,et al.  Evidence for cortical encoding specificity in episodic memory: memory-induced re-activation of picture processing areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Episodic Action Memory for Real Objects: An ERP Investigation With Perform, Watch, and Imagine Action Encoding Tasks Versus a Non-Action Encoding Task , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  A Bartolo,et al.  Pantomimes are special gestures which rely on working memory , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Westwood,et al.  Selective Dysfunction of Tool-Use: A Failure to Integrate Somatosensation and Action , 2003, Neurocase.

[45]  R. Iansek,et al.  Movement-related potentials associated with movement preparation and motor imagery , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Lee Ryan,et al.  An fMRI study of episodic memory: retrieval of object, spatial, and temporal information. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[47]  J Hermsdörfer,et al.  The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia , 2004, Neurology.

[48]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  Kouichi Sutani,et al.  Reactivation of physical motor information in the memory of action events , 2006, Brain Research.

[53]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Enactment versus conceptual encoding: Equivalent item memory but different source memory , 2008, Cortex.