Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure.

AIM Today, cranioplasty is performed using different procedures. Numerous materials may be used to reconstruct the cranial vault including autologous bone and different types of synthetic resins. When plastic materials are used, the main requirement for an effective cranioplasty is the preoperative shaping of the implant to fit the bony defect precisely. In this paper, experience with a new method for cranioplasty using an acrylic cranial implant is presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this new technical procedure an acrylic implant, precisely shaped to the defect, is fabricated preoperatively using CT data. The study consists of 15 cases in whom cranioplasty was performed using this method. In all these, reconstruction was at least 3 months after the initial operation that lead to the cranial bony defect. RESULTS No major complications occurred and the final functional and aesthetic results were good in all cases. The acrylic implant manufacture does not require the use of complex computer interface software or high-tech equipment, but involves simple, cheap, repeatable processes.

[1]  R. Edlich,et al.  Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty. , 1998, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[2]  G. Verna,et al.  [Cranioplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. The clinico-statistical considerations]. , 1998, Minerva chirurgica.

[3]  C. Agner,et al.  Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. , 1999, Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR.

[4]  M. Caterino,et al.  Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  F. Viterbo,et al.  Cranioplasty: the autograft option. , 1995, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[6]  Stephen J. Haines,et al.  Repairing Holes in the Head: A History of Cranioplasty , 1997 .

[7]  Alvin G. Wee,et al.  Reconstruction of cranial bone defects using alloplastic implants produced from a stereolithographically-generated cranial model. , 1999, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[8]  P. D'urso,et al.  Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. , 2000, British journal of plastic surgery.

[9]  M Dujovny,et al.  Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? , 1997, Surgical neurology.

[10]  T M Barker,et al.  Integration of 3-D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models. , 1993, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[11]  R. W. Günther,et al.  Pediatric craniofacial surgery: Comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  B. Toth,et al.  Computer‐Designed Prostheses for Orbitocranial Reconstruction , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  H. Fodstad,et al.  Effect of cranioplasty on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with the syndrome of the trephined , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[14]  P. Knöringer.  [Long-term results of plastic skull repairs with acrylic resins]. , 1979, Zentralblatt fur Neurochirurgie.

[15]  A. Gosain,et al.  Biomaterials in the face: benefits and risks. , 1999, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  O. Antonyshyn,et al.  Cranioplasty: indications, technique, and early results of autogenous split skull cranial vault reconstruction. , 1995, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[17]  E. Mendel,et al.  Acrylic cranioplasty with alginate molding: technical note. , 1997, Neurosurgery.