Private equity firm experience and buyout vendor source: What is their impact on efficiency?

Using a dataset comprising 88 Private Equity (PE) backed Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs) completed and exited during the period 1999–2008, this study sheds new light on the impact of buyout vendor source and PE investor experience on post-buyout efficiency during the first 3years after the transaction. There are three main findings. First, we observe increases in post-buyout efficiency over time, although LBOs from different vendor source differ in terms of post-transaction efficiency levels and improvement trajectories. Private and divisional buyouts are more efficient than the average. Divisional buyouts show higher efficiency improvements than private and secondary buyouts. Secondary buyouts remain below the average. Second, multivariate analyses suggest a positive and significant effect of PE firm experience on post-buyout efficiency. Finally, the observed efficiency patterns seem to be convex, suggesting the major improvements happen in the first 2years after the transaction.

[1]  Li Qi,et al.  Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation , 2008 .

[2]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Entrepreneurial Growth Through Privatization: The Upside of Management Buyouts , 2000 .

[3]  Steven N. Kaplan,et al.  The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value , 1989 .

[4]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2008 .

[5]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows , 2003 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Mohamed Dia,et al.  Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Geraldo da Silva e Souza,et al.  Evolution of bank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[10]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[11]  Mike Wright,et al.  Management Equity Ownership, Debt and Performance: Some Evidence from UK Management Buyouts , 1992 .

[12]  Steve Thompson,et al.  Divestment and the Control of Divisionalised Firms , 1987 .

[13]  Manju Puri,et al.  Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[14]  Steve Thompson,et al.  Corporate Governance: The Role of Restructuring Transactions , 1995 .

[15]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Structure and Management of Alliances: Syndication in the Venture Capital Industry , 2003 .

[16]  M. Wright,et al.  Agency, Strategic Entrepreneurship, and the Performance of Private Equity–Backed Buyouts , 2009 .

[17]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Per Strömberg,et al.  Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts , 2000 .

[19]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Returns to scale in dynamic DEA , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Mike Wright,et al.  Private Equity Syndication: Agency Costs, Reputation and Collaboration , 2009 .

[21]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Measuring dynamic efficiency: Theories and an integrated methodology , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Steven N. Kaplan,et al.  The Evolution of Buyout Pricing and Financial Structure in the 1980s , 1993 .

[23]  Mike Wright,et al.  Secondary management buy‐outs and buy‐ins , 2000 .

[24]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Management Buyouts on Economic Efficiency: Plant-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[26]  Sourafel Girma,et al.  Do Stock Markets Value Efficiency? , 2009 .

[27]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Network DEA efficiency in input-output models: With an application to OECD countries , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Mike Wright,et al.  Private Equity, Leveraged Buyouts and Governance , 2007 .

[29]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[30]  R. Färe,et al.  Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA , 1996 .

[31]  John D. Lamb,et al.  Data envelopment analysis models of investment funds , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Zhiqiang Zheng,et al.  DEA-based hypothesis tests for comparing two groups of decision making units , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[34]  Kwangtae Park,et al.  Measurement of multiperiod aggregative efficiency , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Value Increase in Leveraged Buyouts , 2005 .

[36]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[37]  Steven N. Kaplan,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF BUYOUT PRICING AND FINANCIAL STRUCTURE (OR, WHAT WENT WRONG) IN THE 1980s , 1993 .

[38]  Mike Wright,et al.  Leveraged buyouts, private equity and jobs , 2012 .

[39]  Mike Wright,et al.  Exits, Performance, and Late Stage Private Equity: The Case of UK Management Buy‐Outs , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[40]  J. Odeck Statistical precision of DEA and Malmquist indices: A bootstrap application to Norwegian grain producers , 2009 .

[41]  Michael R. Vetsuypens,et al.  Management Buyouts of Divisions and Shareholder Wealth , 1989 .

[42]  Kevin Amess,et al.  The Effect of Management Buyouts on Firm-Level Technical Inefficiency: Evidence from a Panel of UK Machinery and Equipment Manufacturers , 2003 .

[43]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Human capital theory and venture capital firms: exploring “home runs” and “strike outs” , 2005 .

[44]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance , 2007 .

[45]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Using Malmquist Indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes–Oxley Act , 2009 .

[46]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Hypothesis tests using data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[47]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics , 1996 .

[48]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[49]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[50]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Effects of Leveraged Buyouts on Productivity and Related Aspects of Firm Behavior , 1989 .

[51]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  M. Wright,et al.  Private Equity and Corporate Governance: Retrospect and Prospect , 2009 .

[53]  Mike Wright,et al.  Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Review and Synthesis , 1998 .

[54]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Conor Kehoe,et al.  Private Equity vs. PLC Boards in the U.K.: A Comparison of Practices and Effectiveness , 2008 .

[56]  Mike Wright,et al.  Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad , 2004 .