An Empirical Study of the Object-Oriented Paradigm and Software Reuse

Little or no empirical validation exists for many of software engineering's basic assumptions. While some of these assumptions are intuitive, the need for scientific experimentation remains clear. Several assumptions are made about the factors affecting software reuse, and in particular, the role of the object-oriented paradigm. This paper describes the preliminary results of a controlled experiment designed to evaluate the impact of the object-oriented paradigm on software reuse. The experiment concludes that (1) the object-oriented paradigm substantially improves productivity, although a significant part of this improvement is due to the effect of reuse, (2) reuse without regard to language paradigm improves productivity, (3) language differences are far more important when programmers reuse than when they do not, and (4) the object-oriented paradigm has a particular affinity to the reuse process.

[1]  B. Curtis,et al.  Measurement and experimentation in software engineering , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Ruven E. Brooks,et al.  Studying programmer behavior experimentally: the problems of proper methodology , 1980, CACM.

[3]  D A Boehm-Davis,et al.  Approaches to Structuring the Software Development Process. , 1984 .

[4]  Brian W. Kernighan The Unix System and Software Reusability , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[5]  T. Biggerstaff,et al.  Reusability Framework, Assessment, and Directions , 1987, IEEE Software.

[6]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering , 1987 .

[7]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Reusability: The Case for Object-Oriented Design , 1987, IEEE Software.

[8]  Will Tracz,et al.  Software reuse myths , 1988, SOEN.

[9]  M. Humphrey,et al.  Evaluation of the maintainability of object-oriented software , 1990, IEEE TENCON'90: 1990 IEEE Region 10 Conference on Computer and Communication Systems. Conference Proceedings.