Detecting glaucoma using automated pupillography.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of a binocular automated pupillograph to discriminate healthy subjects from those with glaucoma. DESIGN Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS Both eyes of 116 subjects, including 66 patients with glaucoma in at least 1 eye and 50 healthy subjects from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study. Eyes were classified as glaucomatous by repeatable abnormal standard automated perimetry (SAP) or progressive glaucomatous changes on stereophotographs. METHODS All subjects underwent automated pupillography using the RAPDx pupillograph (Konan Medical USA, Inc., Irvine, CA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic ability of pupil response parameters to white, red, green, yellow, and blue full-field and regional stimuli. A ROC regression model was used to investigate the influence of disease severity and asymmetry on diagnostic ability. RESULTS The largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for any single parameter was 0.75. Disease asymmetry (P <0.001), but not disease severity (P = 0.058), had a significant effect on diagnostic ability. At the sample mean age (60.9 years), AUCs for arbitrary values of intereye difference in SAP mean deviation (MD) of 0, 5, 10, and 15 dB were 0.58, 0.71, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The mean intereye difference in MD was 2.2±3.1 dB. The best combination of parameters had an AUC of 0.85; however, the cross-validated bias-corrected AUC for these parameters was only 0.74. CONCLUSIONS Although the pupillograph had a good ability to detect glaucoma in the presence of asymmetric disease, it performed poorly in those with symmetric disease.

[1]  Michael V. Boland,et al.  Accuracy of pupil assessment for the detection of glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The structure and function relationship in glaucoma: implications for detection of progression and measurement of rates of change. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Crowston,et al.  Validation of a predictive model to estimate the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  G. Spaeth,et al.  The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 2005, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[6]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[7]  H. Lüdtke,et al.  Relativer afferenter Pupillendefekt bei Glaukom , 2011, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[8]  Helmut Wilhelm,et al.  Clinical applications of pupillography. , 2003, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[9]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  G. Gamble,et al.  Retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma patients with a relative afferent pupillary defect. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[12]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Margaret S. Pepe,et al.  A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing , 1997 .

[14]  P. Khaw,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma , 2004, The Lancet.

[15]  A. James,et al.  High-resolution multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry in glaucoma. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  H S Thompson,et al.  The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Jonas,et al.  Quantitative pupillometry of relative afferent defects in glaucoma. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  F. Medeiros,et al.  A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Effect of disease severity on the performance of Cirrus spectral-domain OCT for glaucoma diagnosis. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the Spectralis, Cirrus, and RTVue optical coherence tomography devices in glaucoma. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): design and baseline data. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell count estimates associated with early development of visual field defects in glaucoma. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[24]  A Heijl,et al.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[25]  J J Corbett,et al.  The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  A. James,et al.  Contraction anisocoria: segregation, summation, and saturation in the pupillary pathway. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  J Katz,et al.  Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al.  Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[29]  M. Bartholomew,et al.  Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[30]  N. Volpe,et al.  Correlation Between Intereye Difference in Visual Field Mean Deviation Values and Relative Afferent Pupillary Response as Measured by an Automated Pupillometer in Subjects With Glaucoma , 2014, Journal of glaucoma.

[31]  Kuldev Singh,et al.  Glaucoma Screening Using Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect , 2010, Journal of glaucoma.