Detecting glaucoma using automated pupillography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert N Weinreb | Linda M Zangwill | Felipe A Medeiros | Daniel Meira-Freitas | F. Medeiros | L. Zangwill | R. Weinreb | A. Tatham | Daniel Meira-Freitas | Andrew J Tatham
[1] Michael V. Boland,et al. Accuracy of pupil assessment for the detection of glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Ophthalmology.
[2] Robert N Weinreb,et al. The structure and function relationship in glaucoma: implications for detection of progression and measurement of rates of change. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[3] F. Medeiros,et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.
[4] J. Crowston,et al. Validation of a predictive model to estimate the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.
[5] G. Spaeth,et al. The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 2005, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.
[6] S. Chatterjee,et al. Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .
[7] H. Lüdtke,et al. Relativer afferenter Pupillendefekt bei Glaukom , 2011, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.
[8] Helmut Wilhelm,et al. Clinical applications of pupillography. , 2003, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.
[9] Robert N Weinreb,et al. African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.
[10] G. Gamble,et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma patients with a relative afferent pupillary defect. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[11] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. , 2008, Ophthalmology.
[12] Paul D. Gamlin,et al. The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[13] Margaret S. Pepe,et al. A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing , 1997 .
[14] P. Khaw,et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma , 2004, The Lancet.
[15] A. James,et al. High-resolution multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry in glaucoma. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[16] H S Thompson,et al. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.
[17] J. Jonas,et al. Quantitative pupillometry of relative afferent defects in glaucoma. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.
[18] F. Medeiros,et al. A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[19] F. Medeiros,et al. Effect of disease severity on the performance of Cirrus spectral-domain OCT for glaucoma diagnosis. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[20] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the Spectralis, Cirrus, and RTVue optical coherence tomography devices in glaucoma. , 2011, Ophthalmology.
[21] Robert N Weinreb,et al. The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): design and baseline data. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.
[22] F. Fitzke,et al. Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[23] F. Medeiros,et al. Retinal ganglion cell count estimates associated with early development of visual field defects in glaucoma. , 2013, Ophthalmology.
[24] A Heijl,et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[25] J J Corbett,et al. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.
[26] A. James,et al. Contraction anisocoria: segregation, summation, and saturation in the pupillary pathway. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[27] J Katz,et al. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.
[28] Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al. Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. , 2002, Biostatistics.
[29] M. Bartholomew,et al. Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry. , 1988, Ophthalmology.
[30] N. Volpe,et al. Correlation Between Intereye Difference in Visual Field Mean Deviation Values and Relative Afferent Pupillary Response as Measured by an Automated Pupillometer in Subjects With Glaucoma , 2014, Journal of glaucoma.
[31] Kuldev Singh,et al. Glaucoma Screening Using Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect , 2010, Journal of glaucoma.