Distinctive data envelopment analysis model for evaluating global environment performance

Evaluations of world environmental activities comprise an important research area when obtaining a better understanding of global efforts. However, some environmental criteria might include imprecise data. Environmental criteria can be classified according to four categories: discretionary, non-discretionary, desirable, and undesirable factors. The data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique has been applied widely to assess environmental performance. Classical DEA models evaluate performance of decision making units (DMUs) individually. However, the classical DEA models have some weaknesses. First, they focus on individual DMUs, where they freely assign weights to DMUs to obtain the best efficiency scores. Second, classical DEA models do not aggregate the performance of all DMUs to obtain an overall performance score. Finally, the calculations employed by classical DEA models are very long. To overcome these weaknesses, we propose DEA models for evaluating the individual and overall environmental performance of countries. The proposed models consider discretionary, non-discretionary, desirable, and undesirable factors simultaneously. Countries (DMUs) are ranked using a minimax regret-based approach (MRA). We provide a numerical example that illustrates the application of the proposed models.

[1]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Container selection in the presence of partial dual‐role factors , 2011 .

[2]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa , 2005 .

[3]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[4]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Eco-Efficiency and Convergence in OECD Countries , 2013 .

[5]  William L. Weber,et al.  A note on efficiency and productivity growth in the Korean Banking Industry, 1992–2002 , 2006 .

[6]  Timo Kuosmanen Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs , 2005 .

[7]  Ma Ga Yang,et al.  Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[8]  Donald R. Leal,et al.  Government vs. environment , 2002 .

[9]  G. Timilsina,et al.  Biofuels and Climate Change Mitigation: A CGE Analysis Incorporating Land-Use Change , 2011 .

[10]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[11]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to select eco-efficient technologies in the presence of undesirable outputs , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[12]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[13]  R. Saen,et al.  Developing a new chance-constrained DEA model for suppliers selection in the presence of undesirable outputs , 2012 .

[14]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[15]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators , 2005 .

[16]  Ru-Jen Lin Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices , 2013 .

[17]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[19]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Supplier selection by the pair of nondiscretionary factors-imprecise data envelopment analysis models , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  S. Managi,et al.  The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks : non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output , 2012 .

[22]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[23]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Tanja Srebotnjak Environmental Performance Index , 2014 .

[25]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance , 2008 .

[26]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[27]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Supplier selection using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis with non-discretionary factors and stochastic data , 2012 .

[28]  Willem Moesen,et al.  Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: Unequal weighting when limited information is available , 1991 .

[29]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[30]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Using Super-Efficiency Analysis for Ranking Suppliers in the Presence of Volume Discount Offers , 2008 .

[31]  Tien-Hui Chen,et al.  Performance measurement of an enterprise and business units with an application to a Taiwanese hotel chain , 2009 .

[32]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[33]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[34]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Frederic H. Murphy,et al.  Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[37]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy , 2007 .

[38]  David Besanko,et al.  Performance versus design standards in the regulation of pollution , 1987 .

[39]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new benchmarking approach in Cold Chain , 2012 .