Life-Cycle Assessment of NAND Flash Memory

Solid state drives (SSDs) show potential for environmental benefits over magnetic data storage due to their lower power consumption. To investigate this possibility, a life-cycle assessment (LCA) of NAND flash over five technology generations (150 nm, 120 nm, 90 nm, 65 nm, and 45 nm) is presented to quantify environmental impacts occurring in flash production and to view their trends over time. The inventory of resources and emissions in flash manufacturing, electricity generation, and some chemicals are based on process data, while that of fab infrastructure, water and the remaining chemicals are determined using economic input-output life-cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) or hybrid LCA. Over the past decade, impacts have fallen in all impact categories per gigabyte. Sensitivity analysis shows that the most influential factors over the life-cycle global warming potential (GWP) of flash memory are abatement of perfluorinated compounds and reduction of electricity-related emissions in manufacturing. A limited comparison between the life-cycle energy use and GWP of a 100 GB laptop SSD and hard disk drive shows higher impacts for SSD in many use phase scenarios. This comparison is not indicative for all impact categories, however, and is not conclusive due to differences in boundary and functional unit.

[1]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[2]  Yi-Chou Chen,et al.  Future trend of flash memories , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Workshop on Memory Technology, Design and Testing.

[3]  F. Taiariol,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an integrated circuit product , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. 2001 IEEE ISEE (Cat. No.01CH37190).

[4]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[5]  A. Horvath,et al.  Evaluation of life-cycle air emission factors of freight transportation. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Energy in chemical manufacturing processes: gate-to-gate information for life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[7]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[8]  Nina Kshetry,et al.  Modeling China's semiconductor industry fluorinated compound emissions and drafting a roadmap for climate protection , 2008 .

[9]  E. Williams,et al.  The 1.7 kilogram microchip: energy and material use in the production of semiconductor devices. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[11]  K. Schischke,et al.  Life cycle inventory analysis and identification of environmentally significant aspects in semiconductor manufacturing , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. 2001 IEEE ISEE (Cat. No.01CH37190).

[12]  Nikhil Krishnan,et al.  A hybrid life cycle inventory of nano-scale semiconductor manufacturing. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  D. Dornfeld,et al.  Life-cycle energy demand and global warming potential of computational logic. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Michael E Webber,et al.  The water intensity of the plugged-in automotive economy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Eduardo Pinheiro,et al.  Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population , 2007, FAST.

[16]  D.A. Dornfeld,et al.  Development of the Supply Chain Optimization and Planning for the Environment (SCOPE) tool - applied to solar energy , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment.

[17]  G. Norris.  Impact Characterization in the Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts , 2002 .

[18]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Assessment of Alternative Water Supply Systems (9 pp) , 2006 .