The importance of earthquake interactions for injection‐induced seismicity: Retrospective modeling of the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System

Author(s): Catalli, F; Rinaldi, AP; Gischig, V; Nespoli, M; Wiemer, S | Abstract: ©2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. We explore the role of earthquake interactions during an injection-induced seismic sequence. We propose a model, which considers both a transient pressure and static stress redistribution due to event interactions as triggering mechanisms. By calibrating the model against observations at the Enhanced Geothermal System of Basel, Switzerland, we are able to reproduce the time behavior of the seismicity rate. We observe that considering earthquake interactions in the modeling leads to a larger number of expected seismic events (24% more) if compared to a pressure-induced seismicity only. The increase of the number of events is particularly evident after the end of the injection. We conclude that implementing a model for estimating the static stress changes due to mutual event interactions increases significantly the understanding of the process and the behavior of induced seismicity.

[1]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Validating Models to Forecasting Induced Seismicity Related to Deep Geothermal Energy Projects , 2014 .

[2]  K. Evans,et al.  Stress orientation to 5 km depth in the basement below Basel (Switzerland) from borehole failure analysis , 2009 .

[3]  P. Segall,et al.  Injection‐induced seismicity: Poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects , 2015 .

[4]  Thomas Kohl,et al.  The role of triggering by static stress transfer during geothermal reservoir stimulation , 2012 .

[5]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The static stress change triggering model: Constraints from two southern California aftershock sequences , 1998 .

[6]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Stress drop variations of induced earthquakes at the Basel geothermal site , 2011 .

[7]  J. Rutqvist,et al.  Fault reactivation during CO2 sequestration: Effects of well orientation on seismicity and leakage , 2015 .

[8]  Markus Häring,et al.  Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system , 2008 .

[9]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  Identification of faults activated during the stimulation of the Basel geothermal project from cluster analysis and focal mechanisms of the larger magnitude events , 2014 .

[11]  Y. Okada.  Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Statistical analysis of the induced Basel 2006 earthquake sequence: introducing a probability-based monitoring approach for Enhanced Geothermal Systems , 2011 .

[13]  S. A. Miller,et al.  Modeling enhanced geothermal systems and the essential nature of large‐scale changes in permeability at the onset of slip , 2015 .

[14]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Geomechanical modeling of induced seismicity source parameters and implications for seismic hazard assessment , 2013 .

[15]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  The role of Coulomb stress changes for injection‐induced seismicity: The Basel enhanced geothermal system , 2013 .

[16]  R. Holt,et al.  Reservoir geomechanics , 2021, Developments in Petroleum Science.

[17]  Arno Zang,et al.  Analysis of induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs – An overview , 2014 .

[18]  C. Scholz.  On the stress dependence of the earthquake b value , 2015 .

[19]  Valentin Gischig,et al.  A stochastic model for induced seismicity based on non-linear pressure diffusion and irreversible permeability enhancement , 2013 .

[20]  Arno Zang,et al.  Forward modelling of seismicity rate changes in georeservoirs with a hybrid geomechanical–statistical prototype model , 2014 .

[21]  G. King,et al.  STATIC STRESS CHANGES AND THE TRIGGERING OF EARTHQUAKES , 1994 .

[22]  Jonny Rutqvist,et al.  Coupled THM Modeling of Hydroshearing Stimulation in Tight Fractured Volcanic Rock , 2015, Transport in Porous Media.

[23]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  High-precision relocation and focal mechanism of the injection-induced seismicity at the Basel EGS , 2014 .

[24]  M. Wyss,et al.  Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes , 2005, Nature.

[25]  Reinhard Jung,et al.  A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forêts , 2010 .

[26]  Fabio Moia,et al.  A survey of the induced seismic responses to fluid injection in geothermal and CO2 reservoirs in Europe , 2012 .

[27]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Inter event times of fluid induced earthquakes suggest their Poisson nature , 2011 .

[28]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[29]  A. Alcolea,et al.  Balancing reservoir creation and seismic hazard in enhanced geothermal systems , 2014 .

[30]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Influence of pore‐pressure on the event‐size distribution of induced earthquakes , 2012 .