A Relative Orientation Algebra with Adjustable Granularity

The granularity of spatial calculi and the resulting mathematical properties have always been a major question in solving spatial tasks qualitatively. In this paper we present the Oriented Point Relation Algebra (OPRAm), a new orientation calculus with adjustable granularity. Since our calculus is a relation algebra in the sense of Tarski, fast standard inference methods can be applied. One of the major problems—depending on the environment, the robots’ capabilities and the tasks to be solved—is the choice of the granularity of an applied calculus. To present, granularity had to be chosen at the start and could not be changed on the fly. In a dynamically changing environment under real time conditions it is necessary to choose a coarse but still adequate granularity of the spatial representation: only in that case irrelevant feature changes fail to trigger unnecessary inference steps. A qualitative, coarse abstraction suppresses tiny changes in the environment and leads to fast computation.

[1]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Spatial Knowledge Representation for Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[2]  Reinhard Moratz,et al.  Exploiting Qualitative Spatial Neighborhoods in the Situation Calculus , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[3]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning: An Overview , 2001, Fundam. Informaticae.

[4]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  A Spatial Logic based on Regions and Connection , 1992, KR.

[5]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Modelling Topological and Metrical Properties in Physical Processes , 1989, KR.

[6]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  A new approach to cyclic ordering of 2D orientations using ternary relation algebras , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning Techniques , 1997, KI.

[8]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Double-Crossing: Decidability and Computational Complexity of a Qualitative Calculus for Navigation , 2001, COSIT.

[9]  Debasis Mitra,et al.  Qualitative Direction Calculi with Arbitrary Granularity , 2004, PRICAI.

[10]  Alan K. Mackworth Consistency in Networks of Relations , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Klaus Stein,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Representations of Locomotion and their Application in Robot Navigation , 1999, IJCAI.

[12]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Qualitative spatial reasoning using orientation, distance, and path knowledge , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[13]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Relative Position: The Tradeoff between Strong Formal Properties and Successful Reasoning about Route Graphs , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[15]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Using Orientation Information for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[16]  Peter B. Ladkin,et al.  On binary constraint problems , 1994, JACM.

[17]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  Qualitative Representation of Positional Information , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Reinhard Moratz,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Line Segments , 2000, ECAI.

[19]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  An Algebra for Cyclic Ordering of 2D Orientations , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[20]  Reinhard Moratz,et al.  Empirical Complexity Issues of Practical Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Relative Position , 2004 .

[21]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[22]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Efficient Methods for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning , 2001, J. Artif. Intell. Res..