The self‐evaluation of upper‐gastrointestinal symptoms in Chinese patients with digestive disease: A multicenter questionnaire survey

To investigate the self‐evaluation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in Chinese patients. To observe the role of patients' characters, such as sex, age, education background, and clinic visits, which might affect the self‐understanding of patients.

[1]  P. Moayyedi,et al.  The Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in secondary care are not superior to previous definitions. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[2]  M. Faramarzi,et al.  Psychological factors in patients with peptic ulcerand functional dyspepsia , 2014, Caspian journal of internal medicine.

[3]  M. Bouchoucha,et al.  Anxiety and depression as markers of multiplicity of sites of functional gastrointestinal disorders: a gender issue? , 2013, Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology.

[4]  A. Bredenoord,et al.  Advances in motility testing—current and novel approaches , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[5]  Kyeong Ok Kim,et al.  Predictive Factors of Impaired Quality of Life in Korean Patients With Inactive Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Association With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Mood Disorders , 2013, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[6]  Q. Aziz,et al.  The role of psychosocial factors and psychiatric disorders in functional dyspepsia , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[7]  Nicholas J. Talley,et al.  Functional dyspepsia—symptoms, definitions and validity of the Rome III criteria , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[8]  J. Tack,et al.  A multidimensional model of psychobiological interactions in functional dyspepsia: a structural equation modelling approach , 2012, Gut.

[9]  Meng Li,et al.  [An epidemiological study of functional bowel disorders in Zhejiang college students and its relationship with psychological factors]. , 2012, Zhonghua nei ke za zhi.

[10]  C. Di Lorenzo,et al.  Pediatric patients with dyspepsia have chronic symptoms, anxiety, and lower quality of life as adolescents and adults. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[11]  S. Fereshtehnejad,et al.  Gender Role in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Comparison of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Module (ROME III) Between Male and Female Patients , 2012, Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility.

[12]  W. Allum,et al.  Practice guidance on the management of acute and chronic gastrointestinal problems arising as a result of treatment for cancer , 2011, Gut.

[13]  N. Talley,et al.  A 13‐nation population survey of upper gastrointestinal symptoms: prevalence of symptoms and socioeconomic factors , 2011, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[14]  V. Stanghellini,et al.  Editorial: Reflux, Dyspepsia, and Rome III (or Rome IV?) , 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[15]  N. Talley,et al.  The Rome III Classification of Dyspepsia: Will It Help Research? , 2008, Digestive Diseases.

[16]  D. Drossman,et al.  Rome III: New standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders. , 2006, Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD.

[17]  T. Chiba,et al.  Characteristics of Japanese patients with chronic gastritis and comparison with functional dyspepsia defined by ROME III criteria: based on the large-scale survey, FUTURE study. , 2011, Internal medicine.

[18]  N. Talley.  Functional gastrointestinal disorders in 2007 and Rome III: something new, something borrowed, something objective. , 2007, Reviews in gastroenterological disorders.

[19]  G. Locke,et al.  Gender, age, society, culture, and the patient's perspective in the functional gastrointestinal disorders. , 2006, Gastroenterology.