Framing the biodiversity of agricultural landscape: The essence of local conceptions and constructions

Abstract The knowledge and values of local communities in respect of biodiversity conservation are acknowledged as valuable. This paper explores the constructions and conceptions held by residents in rural areas regarding the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes. The locals’ constructions are examined qualitatively in three frames: conceptual, spatial and aesthetic. The empirical study was carried out in four communities in the municipality of Lammi, in southern Finland. The study revealed that at the local level, biodiversity as a concept is highly elusive and vague. Finnish Agri-environmental Programmes have made the concept of biodiversity more familiar to farmers. Even so, there are still considerable differences between the ways the experts and the local residents perceive the concept of biodiversity. The perceptions of various spatial representations of biodiversity are highly diverse. Biodiversity was widely understood as covering the whole rural ecosystem, including humans. The study also revealed that biodiversity is clearly perceived to be connected to aesthetic appreciations of the rural landscape. In particular, scenic and symbolic rather than ecological aspects are emphasized.

[1]  J. Morris,et al.  Promoting farmer uptake of agri-environment schemes: the Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme , 2000 .

[2]  R. Burton.  Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer's’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour , 2004 .

[3]  Y. Haila.  Biodiversity and the divide between culture and nature , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[4]  Uhanalaisten lajien Ii seurantaryhmä.  Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus 2000 , 2001 .

[5]  John Bailey,et al.  Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions , 2005 .

[6]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[7]  Walter G. Rosen,et al.  The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise , 1997 .

[8]  Joan Iverson Nassauer,et al.  Culture and changing landscape structure , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  J. Niemi,et al.  Finnish Agriculture and Rural Industries 2015. , 2001 .

[10]  Pekka Jokinen,et al.  Agricultural policy community and the challenge of greening: The case of Finnish agri‐environmental policy , 1997 .

[11]  C. Morphet,et al.  A Statistical Method for the Identification of Spatial Clusters , 1997 .

[12]  Paul H. Gobster,et al.  An Ecological Aesthetic for Forest Landscape Management , 1999, Landscape Journal.

[13]  J. Aakkula,et al.  Loss of Plant Species Richness and Habitat Connectivity in Grasslands Associated with Agricultural Change in Finland , 2003, Ambio.

[14]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .

[15]  Johanna Yliskylä-Peuralahti.  Biodiversity—a new spatial challenge for Finnish agri-environmental policies? , 2003 .

[16]  J. Hannigan,et al.  Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective , 1995 .

[17]  Minna Kaljonen,et al.  Co-construction of agency and environmental management. The case of agri-environmental policy implementation at Finnish farms , 2006 .

[18]  Tiina Silvasti.  The cultural model of “the good farmer” and the environmental question in Finland , 2003 .

[19]  G. Setten,et al.  The habitus, the rule and the moral landscape , 2004 .

[20]  A. Garibaldi,et al.  Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration , 2004 .

[21]  Allen Carlson,et al.  Nature, Aesthetic Appreciation, and Knowledge , 1995 .

[22]  S. Kaffka,et al.  A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluating Diversity in Agroecosystems , 1995 .

[23]  Juha Tiainen,et al.  Elämää pellossa : Suomen maatalousympäristön monimuotoisuus , 2004 .

[24]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Farmers and the custody of the countryside: trends in loss and conservation of non-productive habitats 1981-1998 , 2000 .

[25]  A. Irwin.  Sociology and the Environment , 2001 .

[26]  K. Kumm.  Sustainable management of Swedish seminatural pastures with high species diversity , 2003 .

[27]  K. Soini.  Exploring human dimensions of multifunctional landscapes through mapping and map-making , 2001 .

[28]  Andrew Lane,et al.  The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: Different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management , 2000 .

[29]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management , 2003 .

[30]  J. Koricheva,et al.  The phenomenon of biodiversity , 2004 .

[31]  J. Baird Callicott,et al.  Leopold's land aesthetic , 1983 .

[32]  David J. Smith,et al.  Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management , 2004 .

[33]  S. Stoll-Kleemann,et al.  Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities , 2002 .

[34]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[35]  C. Folke,et al.  REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[36]  S. Adalsteinsson,et al.  Temporal changes in genetic variation of north European cattle breeds. , 1999, Animal genetics.

[37]  F. Fischer.  Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[38]  J. Beedell,et al.  Explaining farmers' conservation behaviour : Why do farmers behave the way they do? , 1999 .

[39]  Lisa Tang,et al.  Knowledge in action: Local knowledge as a development resource and barriers to its incorporation in natural resource research and development , 1997 .

[40]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  The urbanization of wildlife management: Social science, conflict, and decision making , 2003 .

[41]  S. Kellert.  Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates , 1993 .

[42]  Joan Iverson Nassauer,et al.  Placing Nature: Culture And Landscape Ecology , 1997 .

[43]  Charles Francis,et al.  Exploring the role of diversity in sustainable agriculture. , 1995 .