Molecular mechanism for the preferential exclusion of TMAO from protein surfaces.

Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) is a naturally occurring protecting osmolyte that stabilizes the folded state of proteins and also counteracts the destabilizing effect of urea on protein stability. Experimentally, it has been inferred that TMAO is preferentially excluded from the vicinity of protein surfaces. Here, we combine computer modeling and experimental measurements to gain an understanding of the mechanism of the protecting effect of TMAO on proteins. We have developed an all-atom molecular model for TMAO that captures the exclusion of TMAO from model compounds and protein surfaces, as a consequence of incorporating realistic TMAO-water interactions through osmotic pressure measurements. Osmotic pressure measurements also suggest no significant attraction between urea and TMAO molecules in solution. To obtain an accurate potential for molecular simulations of protein stability in TMAO solutions, we have explored different ways of parametrizing the protein/osmolyte and osmolyte/osmolyte interactions by scaling charges and the strength of Lennard-Jones interactions and carried out equilibrium folding experiments of Trp-cage miniprotein in the presence of TMAO to guide the parametrization. Our calculations suggest a general principle for preferential interaction behavior of cosolvents with protein surfaces--preferentially excluded osmolytes have repulsive self-interaction given by osmotic coefficient φ > 1, while denaturants, in addition to having attractive interactions with the proteins, have favorable self-interaction given by osmotic coefficient φ < 1, to enable preferential accumulation in the vicinity of proteins.

[1]  I. Yu,et al.  Spatio-temporal characteristics of the transfer free energy of apomyoglobin into the molecular crowding condition with trimethylamine N-oxide: a study with three types of the Kirkwood-Buff integral. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  J. Rösgen,et al.  Volume Exclusion and H-Bonding Dominate the Thermodynamics and Solvation of Trimethylamine-N-oxide in Aqueous Urea , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Samuel S. Cho,et al.  Entropic stabilization of proteins by TMAO. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  M. Record,et al.  Quantifying why urea is a protein denaturant, whereas glycine betaine is a protein stabilizer , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  C. Mueller-Dieckmann,et al.  Trimethylamine N‐oxide as a versatile cryoprotective agent in macromolecular crystallography , 2011 .

[6]  Jeremy L. England,et al.  Role of solvation effects in protein denaturation: from thermodynamics to single molecules and back. , 2011, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[7]  A. Garcia,et al.  Backbone and side-chain contributions in protein denaturation by urea. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[8]  R. Netz,et al.  Can simulations quantitatively predict peptide transfer free energies to urea solutions? Thermodynamic concepts and force field limitations. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[9]  H. Kokubo,et al.  Peptide conformational preferences in osmolyte solutions: transfer free energies of decaalanine. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Soyoung Lee,et al.  Urea interactions with protein groups: a volumetric study. , 2010, Biopolymers.

[11]  D. Harries,et al.  Enthalpically driven peptide stabilization by protective osmolytes. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[12]  T. Oas,et al.  Osmolyte-induced folding of an intrinsically disordered protein: folding mechanism in the absence of ligand. , 2010, Biochemistry.

[13]  G. Belfort,et al.  Self-assembly of TMAO at hydrophobic interfaces and its effect on protein adsorption: insights from experiments and simulations. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[14]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Thermodynamics of the Trp‐cage miniprotein unfolding in urea , 2010, Proteins.

[15]  A. Garcia,et al.  Equilibrium study of protein denaturation by urea. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  Y. Gao,et al.  Effects of urea, tetramethyl urea, and trimethylamine N-oxide on aqueous solution structure and solvation of protein backbones: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[17]  Ming-Jer Lee,et al.  Influence of osmolytes and denaturants on the structure and enzyme activity of alpha-chymotrypsin. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  A. Soper,et al.  Counteraction of urea by trimethylamine N-oxide is due to direct interaction. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Megan B. Kratz,et al.  Interactions of the osmolyte glycine betaine with molecular surfaces in water: thermodynamics, structural interpretation, and prediction of m-values. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[20]  B. Trout,et al.  Molecular computations of preferential interaction coefficients of proteins. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  B Montgomery Pettitt,et al.  Trimethylamine N‐oxide influence on the backbone of proteins: An oligoglycine model , 2009, Proteins.

[22]  C. Royer,et al.  Effect of osmolytes on pressure-induced unfolding of proteins: a high-pressure SAXS study. , 2008, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[23]  Ruhong Zhou,et al.  Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[25]  Helmut Grubmüller,et al.  Interaction of urea with amino acids: implications for urea-induced protein denaturation. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Sandip Paul,et al.  The influence of urea and trimethylamine-N-oxide on hydrophobic interactions. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  Sandip Paul,et al.  Structure and interaction in aqueous urea-trimethylamine-N-oxide solutions. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Unfolding thermodynamics of Trp-cage, a 20 residue miniprotein, studied by differential scanning calorimetry and circular dichroism spectroscopy. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[30]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[31]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  S. Garde,et al.  Osmolyte trimethylamine-N-oxide does not affect the strength of hydrophobic interactions: origin of osmolyte compatibility. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[33]  S. Weerasinghe,et al.  A Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for methanol and aqueous methanol solutions. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[34]  B. Pettitt,et al.  Uncovering the basis for nonideal behavior of biological molecules. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[35]  J. Udgaonkar,et al.  Osmolytes Induce Structure in an Early Intermediate on the Folding Pathway of Barstar* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  S. Weerasinghe,et al.  A Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for the simulation of aqueous guanidinium chloride solutions. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[37]  V. Daggett,et al.  Counteraction of urea-induced protein denaturation by trimethylamine N-oxide: a chemical chaperone at atomic resolution. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  B. Trout,et al.  Proteins in Mixed Solvents: A Molecular-level Perspective , 2003 .

[39]  A. Fornili,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of aqueous solutions of trimethylamine-N-oxide and tert-butyl alcohol , 2003 .

[40]  Doug Barrick,et al.  Measuring the stability of partly folded proteins using TMAO , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  J. Brickmann,et al.  Binary phases of aliphatic N-oxides and water: Force field development and molecular dynamics simulation , 2003 .

[42]  S. Weerasinghe,et al.  A Kirkwood−Buff Derived Force Field for Mixtures of Urea and Water , 2003 .

[43]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Protein-solvent preferential interactions, protein hydration, and the modulation of biochemical reactions by solvent components , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. W. Neidigh,et al.  Designing a 20-residue protein , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[45]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  The molecular mechanism of stabilization of proteins by TMAO and its ability to counteract the effects of urea. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  I. Baskakov,et al.  The osmophobic effect: natural selection of a thermodynamic force in protein folding. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  V A Parsegian,et al.  Osmotic stress, crowding, preferential hydration, and binding: A comparison of perspectives. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  M. Record,et al.  Vapor pressure osmometry studies of osmolyte-protein interactions: implications for the action of osmoprotectants in vivo and for the interpretation of "osmotic stress" experiments in vitro. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[49]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Osmolyte-driven contraction of a random coil protein. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  I. Baskakov,et al.  Forcing Thermodynamically Unfolded Proteins to Fold* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[52]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  A naturally occurring protective system in urea-rich cells: mechanism of osmolyte protection of proteins against urea denaturation. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[53]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[54]  M. Record,et al.  Interpretation of preferential interaction coefficients of nonelectrolytes and of electrolyte ions in terms of a two-domain model. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[55]  T. Lin,et al.  Why do some organisms use a urea-methylamine mixture as osmolyte? Thermodynamic compensation of urea and trimethylamine N-oxide interactions with protein. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[56]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[57]  S. Nosé A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble , 1984 .

[58]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[59]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Preferential interactions of proteins with salts in concentrated solutions. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[60]  M. E. Clark,et al.  Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. , 1982, Science.

[61]  S. Chaykin,et al.  The biosynthesis of trimethylamine-N-oxide. , 1960, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[62]  W. G. McMillan,et al.  The Statistical Thermodynamics of Multicomponent Systems , 1945 .

[63]  B. Roux,et al.  Simulation of Osmotic Pressure in Concentrated Aqueous Salt Solutions , 2010 .

[64]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.