Towards industrial strength philosophy: how analytical ontology can help medical informatics

Abstract Medical research faces a problem of communication. Different communities of medical researchers use different and often incompatible terminologies in expressing the results of their work, and this yields problems of database integration when medical data needs to be entered into computers. Such problems were initially resolved in case by case fashion. Then, however, the idea arose of constructing one single benchmark taxonomy into which all of the various classification systems would need to be translated only once. By serving as a lingua franca for database integration, this taxonomy would ensure that all databases calibrated in its terms would be automatically intercompatible. Interestingly, information scientists called the proposed central classification system an 'ontology', and it was soon realised that work on its construction would have more than a few echoes of the metaphysics of old. The present paper describes an attempt to exploit the resources of philosophy in resolving problems which arise specifically in the field of medical terminology integration. It outlines a collaborative venture between the Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science in Leipzig and the Belgian software company Language & Computing, whereby an ontology based on sound philosophical principles will be tested in the context of powerful software tools for the processing of medical text.

[1]  J. Searle The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[2]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Peter Simons,et al.  Aspects of the Mereology of Artifacts , 1996 .

[4]  Christian Lovis,et al.  Natural language processing tools for the computerised patient record: present and future , 1996 .

[5]  Steffen Schulze-Kremer,et al.  Adding Semantics to Genome Databases: Towards an Ontology for Molecular Biology , 1997, ISMB.

[6]  A Hasman,et al.  Medical narratives in electronic medical records. , 1997, International journal of medical informatics.

[7]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  From syntactic-semantic tagging to knowledge discovery in medical texts , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Reconciling users' needs and formal requirements: issues in developing a reusable ontology for medicine , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[9]  David Koepsell Introduction to Applied Ontology: The Philosophical Analyses of Everyday Objects , 1998 .

[10]  G De Moor,et al.  The distinction between linguistic and conceptual semantics in medical terminology and its implication for NLP-based knowledge acquisition. , 1998, Methods of information in medicine.

[11]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[12]  Werner Ceusters Language Engineering Tools for Healthcare Telematics , 1999 .

[13]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Part-Whole Reasoning: A Case Study in Medical Ontology Engineering , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[14]  David Koepsell,et al.  The Ontology of Cyberspace: Law, Philosophy, and the Future of Intellectual Property , 2000 .

[15]  David M. Mark,et al.  Geographical categories: an ontological investigation , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Barry Smith,et al.  The Metaphysics of Real Estate , 2001 .

[17]  Achille C. Varzi,et al.  Surrounding Space – The Ontology of Organism-Environment Relations , 2002 .

[18]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Some Ontology Engineering Processes and Their Supporting Technologies , 2002, EKAW.

[19]  Barry Smith,et al.  Surrounding space the ontology of organism-environment relations , 2002, Theory in Biosciences.

[20]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Ontology and medical terminology: Why description logics are not enough , 2003 .

[21]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information , 2003 .