Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of uncorrected astigmatism in older adults. SETTING: University vision clinic. DESIGN: Investigational simulation. METHODS: Healthy adult presbyopes had astigmatism of 0.00 to −4.00 diopters cylinder (DC) × 90 degrees and −3.00 DC × 90, × 180, and × 45 degrees induced with spectacle lenses, with the mean spherical equivalent compensated to plano, in random order. Visual acuity was assessed binocularly using a computerized test chart at 95%, 50%, and 10% contrast. Near acuity and reading speed were measured using standardized reading texts. Light scatter was quantified with a C‐Quant straylight meter and driving reaction times with a computer simulator. Visual clarity of a mobile phone and computer screen was subjectively rated. RESULTS: Distance visual acuity in the 21 volunteers decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (F = 174.50, P < .001) and at lower contrasts (F = 170.77, P < .001). Near visual acuity and reading speed also decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatism power (P < .001). Light scatter was not significantly affected by uncorrected astigmatism (P > .05); however, the reliability and variability of measurements decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (P < .05). Driving simulator performance was unaffected by uncorrected astigmatism (P > .05), although subjective rating of clarity decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (P < .001). Uncorrected astigmatism at the 45‐degree or 180‐degree orientation resulted in worse distance and near visual acuity and subjective‐rated clarity than at the 90‐degree orientation (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Uncorrected astigmatism, even as low as 1.00 D, caused significantly decreased vision and if left uncorrected could significantly affect patients’ independence, quality of life, and well‐being. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[1]  Robert Montés-Micó,et al.  Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  D. A. Owens,et al.  Effects of luminance, blur, and age on nighttime visual guidance: A test of the selective degradation hypothesis , 1999 .

[3]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  Visual Difficulties Reported by Low-Vision and Nonimpaired Older Adult Drivers , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[4]  B. Munoz,et al.  Dynamic measures of visual function and their relationship to self-report of visual functioning. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Visual Requirements for Reading , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  Nathan Efron,et al.  Prescribing soft contact lenses for astigmatism. , 2009, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[7]  Michael Belkin,et al.  Adaptation to Monocular Astigmatic Distortion Is Disrupted by Conflicting Binocular Input , 2005 .

[8]  Talissa A. Frank,et al.  The Effects of Severe Visual Challenges on Steering Performance in Visually Healthy Young Drivers , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Susan Vitale,et al.  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Black,et al.  Vision and falls , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[11]  Eva Mönestam,et al.  Long‐time results and associations between subjective visual difficulties with car driving and objective visual function 5 years after cataract surgery , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Surgical correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery , 2010, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[13]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Lotery,et al.  Burden of illness, visual impairment and health resource utilisation of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the UK cohort of a five-country cross-sectional study , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  The changing face of the visually impaired: the Kooyong low vision clinic's past, present, and future. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Ronald Klein,et al.  Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[17]  G. Rubin,et al.  New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  R. Cumming,et al.  Visual function tests, eye disease and symptoms of visual disability: a population‐based assessment , 2000, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Visual and optical performance with hybrid multifocal intraocular lenses , 2010, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[20]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  C. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Luminance, Contrast, and Blur on Visual Acuity , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  James S Wolffsohn,et al.  Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods , 2010, Clinical & experimental optometry.