A robust method to forecast volcanic ash clouds

[1] Ash clouds emanating from volcanic eruption columns often form trails of ash extending thousands of kilometers through the Earth's atmosphere, disrupting air traffic and posing a significant hazard to air travel. To mitigate such hazards, the community charged with reducing flight risk must accurately assess risk of ash ingestion for any flight path and provide robust forecasts of volcanic ash dispersal. In response to this need, a number of different transport models have been developed for this purpose and applied to recent eruptions, providing a means to assess uncertainty in forecasts. Here we provide a framework for optimal forecasts and their uncertainties given any model and any observational data. This involves random sampling of the probability distributions of input (source) parameters to a transport model and iteratively running the model with different inputs, each time assessing the predictions that the model makes about ash dispersal by direct comparison with satellite data. The results of these comparisons are embodied in a likelihood function whose maximum corresponds to the minimum misfit between model output and observations. Bayes theorem is then used to determine a normalized posterior probability distribution and from that a forecast of future uncertainty in ash dispersal. The nature of ash clouds in heterogeneous wind fields creates a strong maximum likelihood estimate in which most of the probability is localized to narrow ranges of model source parameters. This property is used here to accelerate probability assessment, producing a method to rapidly generate a prediction of future ash concentrations and their distribution based upon assimilation of satellite data as well as model and data uncertainties. Applying this method to the recent eruption of Eyjafjallajokull in Iceland, we show that the 3 and 6 h forecasts of ash cloud location probability encompassed the location of observed satellite-determined ash cloud loads, providing an efficient means to assess all of the hazards associated with these ash clouds.

[1]  Michael J. Pavolonis,et al.  A Daytime Complement to the Reverse Absorption Technique for Improved Automated Detection of Volcanic Ash , 2006 .

[2]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Franco Marenco,et al.  Performance assessment of a volcanic ash transport model mini-ensemble used for inverse modeling of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2012 .

[4]  J. Whitaker,et al.  REFORECASTS An Important Dataset for Improving Weather Predictions , 2006 .

[5]  Pordur Arason,et al.  Observations of the altitude of the volcanic plume during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, April-May 2010 , 2011 .

[6]  R. Butler,et al.  Saddlepoint approximation for moment generating functions of truncated random variables , 2004, math/0508605.

[7]  U. Schumann,et al.  Airborne observations of the Eyjafjalla volcano ash cloud over Europe during air space closure in April and May 2010 , 2010 .

[8]  Michael J. Pavolonis Advances in Extracting Cloud Composition Information from Spaceborne Infrared Radiances—A Robust Alternative to Brightness Temperatures. Part I: Theory , 2010 .

[9]  Michael J. Pavolonis,et al.  Gazing at Cirrus Clouds for 25 Years through a Split Window. Part I: Methodology , 2009 .

[10]  U. Schumann,et al.  A case study of observations of volcanic ash from the Eyjafjallajökull eruption: 1. In situ airborne observations , 2012 .

[11]  Kerstin Stebel,et al.  Estimation of the vertical profile of sulfur dioxide injection into the atmosphere by a volcanic eruption using satellite column measurements and inverse transport modeling , 2008 .

[12]  Peter N. Francis,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of dispersion modeling of volcanic ash from Eyjafjallajökull in May 2010 , 2012 .

[13]  Robert B. Ash,et al.  Information Theory , 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[14]  R. Denlinger,et al.  Ash3d: A finite-volume, conservative numerical model for ash transport and tephra deposition , 2012 .

[15]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Evaluating the structure and magnitude of the ash plume during the initial phase of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption using lidar observations and NAME simulations , 2011 .

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[17]  Kerstin Stebel,et al.  Determination of time- and height-resolved volcanic ash emissions and their use for quantitative ash dispersion modeling: the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2011 .

[18]  Franco Marenco,et al.  Airborne lidar observations of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash plume , 2011 .