Assessment of damping coefficients of power take-off systems of wave energy converters: A hybrid approach

Abstract The damping coefficient of the power take-off (PTO) system is a key parameter in the performance assessment of a wave energy converter (WEC). However, since in most WEC studies the focus is mainly on the absorbed power, damping estimation is generally overlooked on the assumption that a single constant coefficient can properly characterize the WEC's damping of a given configuration for all wave conditions. Recently, while analyzing the experimental tests of CECO, a floating-point absorber WEC, significant discrepancies were found among their experimental responses under different incident waves. Instead of attributing those differences to nonlinear hydrostatic or Froude-Krylov effects, it was hypothesized that variations in the PTO damping associated to incident waves was the main cause. This study presents the experimental evidences of that behavior for regular and irregular waves. Furthermore, a hybrid approach for the assessment of damping coefficients is proposed and applied to CECO's experimental responses. The results demonstrated that: a) damping coefficients were significantly affected by wave conditions; b) higher PTO damping coefficients were obtained for milder irregular waves than for rougher regular waves; c) the hybrid approach reliably and efficiently estimated the WEC power in regular and irregular waves.

[1]  Yucheng Liu,et al.  Frequency and time domain modeling and power output for a heaving point absorber wave energy converter , 2014 .

[2]  Rocco Vertechy,et al.  Model-based design and optimization of a dielectric elastomer power take-off for oscillating wave surge energy converters , 2015 .

[3]  Andrew Plummer,et al.  Strategies for active tuning of Wave Energy Converter hydraulic power take-off mechanisms , 2016 .

[4]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Potential Time Domain Model with Viscous Correction and CFD Analysis of a Generic Surging Floating Wave Energy Converter , 2015 .

[5]  T. Adachi,et al.  Analysis and measurement of damping characteristics of linear generator , 2016 .

[6]  Alexandre N. Simos,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Directional Wave-Spectrum Using Vessel Motions and Wave-Probes: Proposal and Preliminary Experimental Validation , 2018 .

[7]  Taeyoung Kim,et al.  Time-domain analysis of nonlinear motion responses and structural loads on ships and offshore structures: development of WISH programs , 2011 .

[8]  Ying Min Low,et al.  A hybrid time/frequency domain approach for efficient coupled analysis of vessel/mooring/riser dynamics , 2008 .

[9]  Yoji Himeno,et al.  Prediction of Ship Roll Damping. A State of the Art , 1981 .

[10]  Mario Lopez,et al.  Numerical modelling of the CECO wave energy converter , 2017 .

[11]  Scott Beatty,et al.  Non-Linear Numerical Modeling and Experimental Testing of a Point Absorber Wave Energy Converter , 2014 .

[12]  Francisco Taveira-Pinto,et al.  Assessment of the power conversion of wave energy converters based on experimental tests , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[13]  Daewoong Son,et al.  Performance validation and optimization of a dual coaxial-cylinder ocean-wave energy extractor , 2016 .

[14]  Yue Qi,et al.  Hydrodynamic responses and efficiency analyses of a heaving-buoy wave energy converter with PTO damping in regular and irregular waves , 2018 .

[15]  Irene Penesis,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling of marine renewable energy devices : a state of the art review , 2015 .

[16]  Edward V. Lewis,et al.  Principles of naval architecture , 1988 .

[17]  Robert Banasiak,et al.  Modelling of hydraulic performance and wave energy extraction by a point absorber in heave , 2004 .

[18]  Masashi Kashiwagi,et al.  Wave Energy Absorption in Irregular Waves by a Floating Body Equipped with Interior Rotating Electric-Power Generator , 2014 .

[19]  V. Shigunov,et al.  Prediction of non-linear ship responses in waves considering forward speed effects , 2016 .

[20]  Ross Henderson,et al.  Design, simulation, and testing of a novel hydraulic power take-off system for the Pelamis wave energy converter , 2006 .

[21]  B. Lemehaute An introduction to hydrodynamics and water waves , 1976 .

[22]  Mario Lopez,et al.  Influence of the power take-off characteristics on the performance of CECO wave energy converter , 2017 .

[23]  Ron J. Patton,et al.  Viscosity effect on a point absorber wave energy converter hydrodynamics validated by simulation and experiment , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[24]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Performance evaluation of a dual resonance wave-energy convertor in irregular waves , 2018, Applied Ocean Research.

[25]  Gonzalo Tampier,et al.  Hydrodynamic analysis of a heaving wave energy converter , 2017 .

[26]  Jang-young Choi,et al.  Design and analysis of tubular permanent magnet linear generator for small-scale wave energy converter , 2017 .

[27]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies , 2010 .

[28]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  The effect of internal resistance on an energy harvester with cubic resistance load , 2015 .

[29]  G. De Backer Hydrodynamic design optimization of wave energy converters consisting of heaving point absorbers , 2009 .

[30]  J. Zang,et al.  Geometrical Evaluation on the Viscous Effect of Point-Absorber Wave-Energy Converters , 2018, China Ocean Engineering.

[31]  Giuliana Mattiazzo,et al.  Experimental validation of the ISWEC wave to PTO model , 2016 .

[32]  Francisco Taveira-Pinto,et al.  CECO wave energy converter: Experimental proof of concept , 2015 .

[33]  João Marinheiro,et al.  Feasibility study of the CECO wave energy converter , 2015 .

[34]  R. Bhattacharyya Dynamics of Marine Vehicles , 1978 .

[35]  J. Zang,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on a novel dual-resonance wave energy converter with a built-in power take-off system , 2018, Energy.

[36]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems: Linear Interactions Including Wave-Energy Extraction , 2002 .