An analysis of rock magnetic data

The data obtained from numerous palaeomagnetic measurements made during the past decade have shown that while the geologically younger rock formations are magnetized in directions close to that of the present earth’s magnetic field, the remanent magnetic polarizations of older rocks depart markedly from this pattern. These observations are widely held by many workers to suggest that the main continental land masses have undergone movements relative to one another during the past. The present paper gives an account of a new analysis of the available data, making a minimum number of theoretical assumptions about the ways in which the rocks became magnetized and about the origin of the geomagnetic field. The results of this analysis strongly support the supposition that the observed wide divergence between the directions of the remanent magnetic vectors of older rocks and that of the present earth’s field is systematic, and not a result of purely random processes occurring throughout geological time. The most reasonable explanations of the phenomenon appear to be that (a) the directions of magnetization of the earlier rocks have been changed by some widespread physical or geological processes since the time of their formation, (b) the earth’s magnetic field has had strong multipolar components in past geological ages, (c) a relative drift of the continents across the earth’s mantle has occurred. Of these hypotheses, (c) appears to be the most plausible. On the tentative assumption that the rock magnetic results can be explained by continental drift, it is possible to estimate the ancient latitude and the orientation relative to the earth’s rotational axis, of each continent, although by palaeomagnetic measurements alone changes in relative longitude cannot be revealed.

[1]  L. G. Howell,et al.  Some observations on rock magnetism , 1958 .

[2]  E. R. Deutsch,et al.  The remanent magnetism of some lavas in the deccan traps , 1958 .

[3]  N. Opdyke,et al.  The Geomagnetic Field in Upper Triassic Times in the United States , 1957, Nature.

[4]  D. Blundell A Palaeomagnetic Investigation of the Lundy Dyke Swarm , 1957, Geological Magazine.

[5]  T. Sigurgeirsson Direction of magnetization in Icelandic basalts , 1957 .

[6]  L. G. Howell,et al.  Polar movement as indicated by rock magnetism , 1957 .

[7]  P. M. D. Bois Comparison of palaeomagnetic results for selected rocks of Great Britain and North America , 1957 .

[8]  A. L. Hales,et al.  Palaeomagnetic measurements on Karroo dolerites , 1957 .

[9]  A. Cox Remanent Magnetization of Lower to Middle Eocene Basalt Flows from Oregon , 1957, Nature.

[10]  C. D. Campbell,et al.  Magnetization of the Columbia River basalts in Washington and northern Oregon , 1956 .

[11]  D. H. Griffiths,et al.  XLII. Rock magnetism in India , 1956 .

[12]  S. Runcorn Paleomagnetic Survey in Arizona and Utah: Preliminary Results , 1956 .

[13]  J. Graham Evidence of polar shift since triassic time , 1955 .

[14]  T. Gold Instability of the Earth's Axis of Rotation , 1955, Nature.

[15]  J. Hospers Rock Magnetism and Polar Wandering , 1954, Nature.

[16]  T. Murphy,et al.  Magnetic polarization of sedimentary rocks and the Earth's magnetic history , 1949 .

[17]  J. Graham The stability and significance of magnetism in sedimentary rocks , 1949 .

[18]  J. W. Gregory,et al.  The Origin of Continents and Oceans , 1925, Nature.

[19]  E. Irving Palaeomagnetic and palaeoclimatological aspects of polar wandering , 1956 .

[20]  S. Runcorn,et al.  The Direction of the Geomagnetic Field in Remote Epochs in Great Britain , 1954 .

[21]  A. Holmes VII.—The Construction of a Geological Time-Scale , 1947, Transactions of the Glasgow Geological Society.

[22]  F. Yates,et al.  Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. , 1939 .

[23]  A. Chevalier Sur une Sterculiacée d'Indochine (Firmiana affinis) à graines mucilagineuses utilisables. , 1925 .