Sampling problems in an heterogeneous organ: Quantitation of relative and total volume of pancreatic islets by light microscopy

In stereological studies analysis of sampling variances is used for optimizing the sampling design. In organs with a heterogeneous distribution of the phase of interest the analysis of sampling variances can be undertaken only if the observed variance between sections is distributed into the fraction which is due to random variation and the fraction which is due to the heterogeneity. In the present example (pancreatic islet volume estimated by light microscopic point‐counting) the density of islets showed a linear increase along the axis of the organ. By analysis of sampling variances it was calculated that the most efficient number of sections (cut perpendicular to the organ) was considerably lower when the isolated contribution from the random variation was considered.

[1]  T. Mayhew,et al.  Inter‐animal variation and its influence on the overall precision of morphometric estimates based on nested sampling designs , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Stereological estimation of volume ratios by systematic sections , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  A. Reith,et al.  Comparison of semiautomatic digitizer-tablet and simple point counting performance in morphometry , 1981, Virchows Archiv. B, Cell pathology including molecular pathology.

[4]  J. Iversen Effect of Acetyl Choline on the Secretion of Glucagon and Insulin from the Isolated, Perfused Canine Pancreas , 1973, Diabetes.

[5]  J Shay,et al.  Economy of effort in electron microscope morphometry. , 1975, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  E R Weibel,et al.  Comparison of two subsampling methods for electron microscopic morphometry * , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  H. Robinson Principles and Procedures of Statistics , 1961 .

[8]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Measuring error and sampling variation in stereology: comparison of the efficiency of various methods for planar image analysis , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  Eva B. Vedel Jensen,et al.  Stereological ratio estimation based on counts from integral test systems , 1982 .

[10]  W L Nicholson,et al.  Application of Statistical Methods in Quantitative Microscopy * , 1978, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Sampling designs for stereology * , 1981, Journal of microscopy.