Protest reporting across clientelist media systems

Most protest paradigm studies examining news media's portrayals of protesters are based on an assumption that the way the paradigm operates within the U.S. media system is similar around the globe. To overcome these weaknesses, this content analysis (n = 1200) of protest-related news coverage in two Balkan and two Central American countries examines how media clientelism-manifested via ownership, concentration, and state advertising-influences media representations of protesters. Results highlight important regional differences in protest coverage, and confirm the role of government and elites in clientelist environments is more complex than hypothesized. We found that while clientelism contributes to the protest paradigm, delegitimizing coverage is not automatic, and varies by frame and media ownership, as political and economic interests differentially influence protest coverage depending not just on the outlets’ ties to the state, but also the social contexts surrounding the protests themselves.

[1]  L. Camaj.  Producing anti-regime protest news in a polarized and clientelistic media system: A frame building approach , 2021, Journalism.

[2]  César Jiménez-Martínez.  Media and the Image of the Nation during Brazil’s 2013 Protests , 2020 .

[3]  Danielle K. Kilgo,et al.  Protests, Media Coverage, and a Hierarchy of Social Struggle , 2019, The International Journal of Press/Politics.

[4]  Rachel R. Mourão.  From Mass to Elite Protests: News Coverage and the Evolution of Antigovernment Demonstrations in Brazil , 2018, Mass Communication and Society.

[5]  R. Benson.  Can foundations solve the journalism crisis? , 2018 .

[6]  Danielle K. Kilgo,et al.  From #Ferguson to #Ayotzinapa: Analyzing Differences in Domestic and Foreign Protest News Shared on Social Media , 2018, Social Media News and Its Impact.

[7]  M. Deuze,et al.  Ideology as Resource in Entrepreneurial Journalism , 2016, Entrepreneurial Journalism.

[8]  Irina Milutinović.  Media ownership and democratic capacity of transitional society: The case of Serbia , 2017 .

[9]  R. Rockwell.  Evolving media structures in Central America , 2017 .

[10]  Julia Cagé.  Saving the Media: Capitalism, Crowdfunding, and Democracy , 2016 .

[11]  Saif Shahin,et al.  Protesting the Paradigm , 2016 .

[12]  Summer Harlow,et al.  Regenerating Journalism , 2016 .

[13]  Patrick Ferrucci.  Public journalism no more: The digitally native news nonprofit and public service journalism , 2015 .

[14]  R. Wouters.  Reporting Demonstrations: On Episodic and Thematic Coverage of Protest Events in Belgian Television News , 2015 .

[15]  Karin Gwinn Wilkins,et al.  The politics of political communication: Competing news discourses of the 2011 Egyptian protests , 2015 .

[16]  J. Wasko.  The study of the political economy of the media in the twenty-first century , 2014 .

[17]  P. Troch.  From “And” to “Either/or” , 2014 .

[18]  S. Waisbord.  Democracy, journalism, and Latin American populism , 2013 .

[19]  R. C. Nee.  Creative Destruction: An Exploratory Study of How Digitally Native News Nonprofits Are Innovating Online Journalism Practices , 2013 .

[20]  Joshua M. Scacco,et al.  Revisiting the Protest Paradigm , 2013 .

[21]  Henrik Örnebring.  Clientelism, Elites, and the Media in Central and Eastern Europe , 2012 .

[22]  P. Mancini.  Instrumentalization of the media vs. political parallelism , 2012 .

[23]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  Adherence to the Protest Paradigm , 2012 .

[24]  S. Waisbord.  The Myth of Media Globalization – By K. Hafez , 2008 .

[25]  Natalia Roudakova.  Media—political clientelism: lessons from anthropology , 2008 .

[26]  Mauro Porto,et al.  TV news and political change in Brazil , 2007 .

[27]  D. Hallin,et al.  Political clientelism and the media: southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective , 2002 .

[28]  Andrea Prat,et al.  Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability , 2002 .

[29]  J. Lawson.  Building the fourth estate , 1999 .

[30]  Pamela J. Shoemaker,et al.  Media Treatment of Deviant Political Groups , 1984 .