The Three Secrets of Megaproject Success: Clear Strategic Vision, Total Alignment, and Adapting to Complexity

Past studies have often voiced concern that important megaprojects have repeatedly failed due to extensive overruns, misunderstanding of expectations, or both. In this article, we contend that this pattern may not be inevitable. In retrospect, despite painful delays, some megaprojects eventually achieved their longer-term objectives. In this study, rather than asking why megaprojects fail, we asked whether these notable (and rare) accomplishments have anything in common. We found that successful megaprojects are distinguished by three major elements: clear strategic vision, total alignment, and adapting to complexity.

[1]  C. Loch,et al.  Has Megaproject Management Lost Its Way , 2017 .

[2]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Introduction: The Iron Law of Megaproject Management , 2017 .

[3]  Knut Samset,et al.  Ex Ante Project Evaluation and the Complexity of Early Decision-Making , 2017 .

[4]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Management Innovation What Is Management Innovation? Four Perspectives on Management Innovation Table 1 Key Features of Four Perspectives on Management Innovation Features Institutional Perspective Fashion Perspective Cultural Perspective Rational Perspective an Operational Definition of Management , 2022 .

[5]  Robert J. Chapman,et al.  A framework for examining the dimensions and characteristics of complexity inherent within rail megaprojects , 2016 .

[6]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation in Highly Complex Projects: What Can We Learn from Boeing's Dreamliner Experience? , 2016 .

[7]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects? , 2016 .

[8]  Joachim Thiel,et al.  Projects, people, professions: Trajectories of learning through a mega-event (the London 2012 case) , 2015 .

[9]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management , 2015 .

[10]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China—A fuzzy analytic network process analysis , 2015 .

[11]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  What great projects have in common , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[12]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Thinking big: Politics, progress, and security in the management of Asian and European energy megaprojects , 2014 .

[13]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Leading by Metaphors –A Case Study of a Mega IT Project in a Danish Bank , 2014 .

[14]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Managing Structural and Dynamic Complexity: A Tale of Two Projects , 2014 .

[15]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Project Complexity and Systems Integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games , 2014 .

[16]  Milena M. Parent,et al.  The theory and practice of knowledge management and transfer: The case of the Olympic Games , 2014 .

[17]  B. Flyvbjerg What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview , 2014, 1409.0003.

[18]  S. Tamer Cavusgil,et al.  Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management , 2013 .

[19]  G. O'Connor,et al.  A Comprehensive Model of Uncertainty Associated with Radical Innovation , 2013 .

[20]  Guishan Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessments of the Three Gorges Project in China: Issues and interventions , 2013 .

[21]  Chen-Yu Chang,et al.  Understanding the hold-up problem in the management of megaprojects: The case of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link project , 2013 .

[22]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames , 2012 .

[23]  Mendel Giezen,et al.  Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning , 2012 .

[24]  Stefano Ronchi,et al.  A transaction costs approach to purchasing portfolio management , 2012 .

[25]  A. Wald,et al.  A Bibliometric View on the Use of Contingency Theory in Project Management Research , 2012 .

[26]  Peerasit Patanakul,et al.  What Project Strategy Really Is: The Fundamental Building Block in Strategic Project Management , 2012 .

[27]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  Measuring Program Success , 2012 .

[28]  R. Müller,et al.  The development of constructs of program context and program success : a qualitative study , 2011 .

[29]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects , 2011 .

[30]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework , 2011 .

[31]  B. Flyvbjerg Over Budget, Over Time, Over and Over Again: Managing Major Projects , 2011 .

[32]  Hans-Henrich Altfeld,et al.  Commercial Aircraft Projects: Managing the Development of Highly Complex Products , 2010 .

[33]  R. Dhar,et al.  The power of customers' mindset , 2010 .

[34]  Knut Samset,et al.  Early Project Appraisal: Making the Initial Choices , 2010 .

[35]  Y. Lü,et al.  Three Gorges Project: Efforts and challenges for the environment , 2010 .

[36]  Rainer Seidel,et al.  A project contingency framework based on uncertainty and its consequences , 2010 .

[37]  Knut Samset,et al.  Early Project Appraisal , 2010 .

[38]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss , 2009 .

[39]  Darren Dalcher Book Review: Managing Complex Projects: A New Model , 2009 .

[40]  Deborah D. Stine The Manhattan Project, the Apollo Program, and Federal Energy Technology R&D Programs: A Comparative Analysis , 2009 .

[41]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Managing New Product Development and Supply Chain Risks: The Boeing 787 Case , 2009 .

[42]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Exuberant Innovations: The Apollo Program , 2009 .

[43]  Sylvain Lenfle,et al.  Exploration and Project Management , 2008 .

[44]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  The Universe in a Mirror: The Saga of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Visionaries Who Built It , 2008 .

[45]  O. Williamson OUTSOURCING: TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT† , 2008 .

[46]  J. Davidson Frame Book Review: Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation , 2008 .

[47]  Kai Riemer,et al.  IT Mega Projects: What They Are and Why They Are Special , 2008, ECIS.

[48]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Public sector information system project failures: Lessons from a New Zealand hospital organization , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Rob McLean,et al.  Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies , 2006 .

[50]  Beatriz Plaza The Return on Investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao , 2006 .

[51]  Andrew Sage,et al.  Toward a NASA-Specific Project Management Framework , 2005 .

[52]  Terry Williams,et al.  Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[53]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[54]  L. Ye,et al.  Functionalized composite structures for new generation airframes: a review , 2005 .

[55]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Design by Deception: The Politics of Megaproject Approval , 2005 .

[56]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[57]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  A mathematical theory of strong emergence using multiscale variety , 2004, Complex..

[58]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[60]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept , 2001 .

[61]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Beatriz Plaza Evaluating the Influence of a Large Cultural Artifact in the Attraction of Tourism , 2000 .

[63]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000, MIS Q..

[64]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[65]  Terry Williams,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects , 1999 .

[66]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  Company-wide project management: the planning and control of programmes of projects of different type , 1999 .

[67]  Angus Kress Gillespie,et al.  Twin Towers: The Life of New York City's World Trade Center , 1999 .

[68]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[69]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[70]  Audley Genus Managing large-scale technology and inter-organizational relations: the case of the Channel Tunnel , 1997 .

[71]  A. Shenhar,et al.  The relative importance of project success dimensions , 1997 .

[72]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms , 1997 .

[73]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[74]  Walid Belassi,et al.  A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects , 1996 .

[75]  O. Williamson Revisiting Legal Realism: The Law, Economics, and Organization Perspective , 1996 .

[76]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[77]  Andrew R. Goetz,et al.  Getting realistic about megaproject planning: The case of the new Denver International Airport , 1995 .

[78]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[79]  P. Stopher Financing urban rail projects: The case of Los Angeles , 1993 .

[80]  Hein Schreuder,et al.  Economic Approaches to Organizations , 1993 .

[81]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them , 1993 .

[82]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[83]  Johannes M. Pennings,et al.  Structural contingency theory: A re-appraisal , 1992 .

[84]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[85]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[86]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[87]  Paolo Leon The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1986, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[88]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[89]  Robert A. Burgelman A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[90]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[91]  O. Williamson The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[92]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[93]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Complexity and the representation of patterned sequences of symbols. , 1972 .

[94]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[95]  Joseph Dorfman,et al.  Institutional Economics , 2023 .