Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication

Tumors with somatic mutations in the proofreading exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE-exo*) exhibit a novel mutator phenotype, with markedly elevated TCT→TAT and TCG→TTG mutations and overall mutation frequencies often exceeding 100 mutations/Mb. Here, we identify POLE-exo* tumors in numerous cancers and classify them into two groups, A and B, according to their mutational properties. Group A mutants are found only in POLE, whereas Group B mutants are found in POLE and POLD1 and appear to be nonfunctional. In Group A, cell-free polymerase assays confirm that mutations in the exonuclease domain result in high mutation frequencies with a preference for C→A mutation. We describe the patterns of amino acid substitutions caused by POLE-exo* and compare them to other tumor types. The nucleotide preference of POLE-exo* leads to increased frequencies of recurrent nonsense mutations in key tumor suppressors such as TP53, ATM, and PIK3R1. We further demonstrate that strand-specific mutation patterns arise from some of these POLE-exo* mutants during genome duplication. This is the first direct proof of leading strand-specific replication by human POLE, which has only been demonstrated in yeast so far. Taken together, the extremely high mutation frequency and strand specificity of mutations provide a unique identifier of eukaryotic origins of replication.

[1]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Unique Error Signature of the Four-subunit Yeast DNA Polymerase ϵ* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[3]  C. Keller,et al.  The Origin Recognition Complex Marks a Replication Origin in the Human TOP1 Gene Promoter* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  E. Johansson,et al.  Structural basis for processive DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase ɛ , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  T. Kunkel,et al.  DNA mismatch repair. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[6]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer , 2012, Nature.

[7]  M. Loda,et al.  Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines. , 1997, Cancer research.

[8]  Carrie M. Welch,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase δ , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Daniel P. Kane,et al.  A common cancer-associated DNA polymerase ε mutation causes an exceptionally strong mutator phenotype, indicating fidelity defects distinct from loss of proofreading. , 2014, Cancer research.

[10]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma , 2013, Nature.

[11]  P. Dijkwel,et al.  A winding road to origin discovery , 2009, Chromosome Research.

[12]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  Amino Acid Changes in Disease-Associated Variants Differ Radically from Variants Observed in the 1000 Genomes Project Dataset , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  I. Tomlinson,et al.  DNA polymerase ɛ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[14]  M. S. Valenzuela Initiation of DNA Replication in the Human Genome. , 2012, Hereditary genetics : current research.

[15]  M. Köbel,et al.  POLE exonuclease domain mutation predicts long progression-free survival in grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[16]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Mismatch Repair Balances Leading and Lagging Strand DNA Replication Fidelity , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[17]  S. Gruber,et al.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer—the stable evidence , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Structural basis of high fidelity DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase delta , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  M. He,et al.  Frequent POLE1 p.S297F mutation in Chinese patients with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. , 2014, Mutation research.

[20]  L. Loeb,et al.  High fidelity and lesion bypass capability of human DNA polymerase delta. , 2009, Biochimie.

[21]  L. Reha-Krantz DNA polymerase proofreading: Multiple roles maintain genome stability. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Regulation of B family DNA polymerase fidelity by a conserved active site residue: characterization of M644W, M644L and M644F mutants of yeast DNA polymerase ε , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  Z. Pursell,et al.  Human DNA Polymerase ϵ Is Able to Efficiently Extend from Multiple Consecutive Ribonucleotides* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  H. Pospiech,et al.  Segregation of Replicative DNA Polymerases during S Phase , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  U. Hübscher,et al.  The 3′–5′ exonucleases , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  L. Loeb,et al.  Human cancers express mutator phenotypes: origin, consequences and targeting , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  E. Fanning,et al.  The Chinese Hamster Dihydrofolate Reductase Replication Origin Beta Is Active at Multiple Ectopic Chromosomal Locations and Requires Specific DNA Sequence Elements for Activity , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Yeast DNA Polymerase ε Participates in Leading-Strand DNA Replication , 2007, Science.

[29]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The Major Roles of DNA Polymerases Epsilon and Delta at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork Are Evolutionarily Conserved , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[30]  Wei Yang,et al.  Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism , 2010, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[31]  L. Zentilin,et al.  Fine mapping of a replication origin of human DNA. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Tomas Lindahl,et al.  Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[33]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[34]  O. Aparicio,et al.  Location, location, location: it's all in the timing for replication origins. , 2013, Genes & development.

[35]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Analyzing fidelity of DNA polymerases. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[36]  C. Lázaro,et al.  New insights into POLE and POLD1 germline mutations in familial colorectal cancer and polyposis. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[37]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The 3′→5′ exonuclease of DNA polymerase δ can substitute for the 5′ flap endonuclease Rad27/Fen1 in processing Okazaki fragments and preventing genome instability , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Igor V. Shevelev,et al.  The 3|[prime]||[ndash]|5|[prime]| exonucleases , 2002 .

[39]  M. Méchali,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  E. Oki,et al.  Concurrent genetic alterations in DNA polymerase proofreading and mismatch repair in human colorectal cancer , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[41]  M. Giacca,et al.  Start sites of bidirectional DNA synthesis at the human lamin B2 origin. , 2000, Science.

[42]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Germline mutations in the proof-reading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Chris Sander,et al.  Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[44]  R. Schaaper,et al.  Spontaneous mutation in the Escherichia coli lacI gene. , 1991, Genetics.

[45]  J. Hamlin,et al.  Isolation of the amplified dihydrofolate reductase domain from methotrexate-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cells , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[46]  Z. Pursell,et al.  The high fidelity and unique error signature of human DNA polymerase ε , 2010, Nucleic acids research.