The association between high status positions and aggressive behavior in early adolescence.

The present study examined the association between high status social positions in early adolescence and both overt and relational aggression. A sample of 234 sixth graders (132 girls, 102 boys) completed peer nominations assessing aggression, social centrality, and coolness. Data analyses were based on all sixth graders who received peer nominations, for a total sample size of 417 students (224 girls, 193 boys). Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine both within-peer group differences and between-peer group differences. Results indicated relational aggression was related to higher overall social centrality and being nominated as cool even when controlling for overt aggression. Overt aggression appeared to be related to higher overall social centrality and being nominated as cool, but this relationship was much weaker when relational aggression was controlled. Although girls used relational aggression more often and boys used overt aggression more often, the use of relational aggression by either gender was related to membership in high status peer groups and high status within the peer group. Implications of the findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  J. Coie,et al.  A developmental perspective on peer rejection: mechanisms of stability and change. , 1999, Child development.

[2]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[3]  T. Farmer,et al.  Different Forms of Aggression among Inner-City African-American Children: Gender, Configurations, and School Social Networks. , 2003 .

[4]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. , 2004, Child development.

[5]  T. Farmer,et al.  Who do students with mild disabilities nominate as cool in inclusive general education classrooms , 2006 .

[6]  W. Hartup,et al.  The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. , 1996 .

[7]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Peer Experience: Common and Unique Features of Number of Friendships, Social Network Centrality, and Sociometric Status , 2001 .

[8]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Handbook of adolescent psychology , 2009 .

[9]  B. Schneider,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and peer acceptance: invariance across culture, stability over time, and concordance among informants. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[10]  David Robins,et al.  Cool Rules: Anatomy of an Attitude , 2000 .

[11]  M. Gettinger.  Promoting Social Competence in an Era of School Reform: A Commentary on Gifford-Smith and Brownell. , 2003 .

[12]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Social Impact and Social Preference as Determinants of Children's Peer Group Status , 1983 .

[13]  W. Hartup,et al.  Heterogeneity among Peer-Rejected Boys: Subtypes and Stabilities. , 1992 .

[14]  A. Cillessen,et al.  Expectations and perceptions at school transitions: The role of peer status and aggression , 2007 .

[15]  W. Damon,et al.  Social, emotional, and personality development , 1998 .

[16]  N. Crick,et al.  Engagement in Gender Normative Versus Nonnormative Forms of Aggression: Links to Social-Psychological Adjustment , 1997 .

[17]  T. Kindermann,et al.  Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. , 2007, Child development.

[18]  R B Cairns,et al.  Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. , 1995, Child development.

[19]  Tracy Vaillancourt,et al.  Aggression and social status: the moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics , 2006 .

[20]  R. Cairns,et al.  Aggression in Inner-City Early Elementary Classrooms: Individual and Peer-Group Configurations , 2002 .

[21]  T. Farmer,et al.  Social status and aggressive and disruptive behavior in girls: individual, group, and classroom influences. , 2008, Journal of school psychology.

[22]  Kate Musgrove,et al.  Dimensions of Social Status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance , 2002 .

[23]  J. Coie,et al.  A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children , 1991 .

[24]  Jack C. Wright,et al.  Social status in small groups: Individual–group similarity and the social "misfit." , 1986 .

[25]  T. Farmer,et al.  Bullies and victims in rural African American youth: behavioral characteristics and social network placement. , 2007, Aggressive behavior.

[26]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[27]  N. Crick,et al.  Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. , 2002, Child development.

[28]  R. Cairns,et al.  The Development of Aggressive Behaviors Among Girls: Measurement Issues, Social Functions, and Differential Trajectories. , 2005 .

[29]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[30]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[31]  R. Cairns,et al.  Aggressive Behaviors in Social Interaction and Developmental Adaptation: A Narrative Analysis of Interpersonal Conflicts During Early Adolescence , 2002 .

[32]  G. Bear,et al.  Relational Aggression and Peer Relations: Gender and Developmental Issues. , 1997 .

[33]  Jean A. Baker.  Are We Missing the Forest for the Trees? Considering the Social Context of School Violence. , 1998 .

[34]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Children's peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? , 1988 .

[36]  R. Cairns,et al.  The development of social aggression and physical aggression: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts , 2002 .

[37]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. , 1995, Child development.

[38]  J. Axelrod,et al.  Children's Social Constructions of Popularity , 2002 .

[39]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[40]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's Interpersonal Perceptions as a Function of Sociometric and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1999 .

[41]  K. Markon,et al.  Childhood aggression and gender: a new look at an old problem. , 1998, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[42]  Wendy E. Ellis,et al.  Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children's deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. , 2007, Child development.

[43]  S. Coyne,et al.  An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  R. Cairns,et al.  Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in our Time , 1994 .

[45]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Identifying Children's Peer Social Networks in School Classrooms: Links Between Peer Reports and Observed Interactions , 2003 .

[46]  T. Dishion,et al.  Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. , 1995, Child development.

[47]  Julie Boergers,et al.  Overt and Relational Aggression in Adolescents: Social-Psychological Adjustment of Aggressors and Victims , 2001, Journal of clinical child psychology.

[48]  Dianne M. Gut,et al.  Implications of Social Development Research for School-Based Interventions for Aggressive Youth with EBD , 1999 .

[49]  Frances E. Aboud,et al.  Determinants of friendship selection and quality: Developmental perspectives. , 1996 .

[50]  T. Farmer,et al.  Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[51]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups , 2007 .

[52]  T. Farmer,et al.  They’re Cool: Social Status and Peer Group Supports for Aggressive Boys and Girls , 2006 .

[53]  P. Adler,et al.  Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity , 1998 .

[54]  R. Cairns,et al.  Social Networks and Configurations in Inner-City Schools: Aggression, Popularity, and Implications for Students with EBD , 1999 .

[55]  S. Luthar,et al.  Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates , 1996 .

[56]  Richard M. Lerner,et al.  Handbook of adolescent psychology, 2nd ed. , 2004 .

[57]  A. Caspi,et al.  Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females , 2001, Development and Psychopathology.

[58]  S. Luthar,et al.  Peer-Perceived Admiration and Social Preference: Contextual Correlates of Positive Peer Regard Among Suburban and Urban Adolescents. , 2007, Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

[59]  D. Espelage,et al.  Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. , 2003, Child development.

[60]  R. Horner,et al.  A Promising Approach for Expanding and Sustaining School-Wide Positive Behavior Support , 2006 .

[61]  T. Farmer,et al.  Antisocial and Prosocial Correlates of Classroom Social Positions: The Social Network Centrality Perspective , 1996 .

[62]  Jamie M Ostrov,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Relational Aggression, Physical Aggression, and Children's Social–Psychological Adjustment , 2006, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[63]  Amanda J. Rose,et al.  Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[64]  D. Merten.  The Meaning of Meanness: Popularity, Competition, and Conflict among Junior High School Girls. , 1997 .

[65]  C. Bagwell,et al.  Peer Clique Participation and Social Status in Preadolescence. , 2000 .

[66]  S. Graham,et al.  Ethnicity, Peer Harassment, and Adjustment in Middle School: , 2002 .

[67]  P. Hawley.  Prosocial and Coercive Configurations of Resource Control in Early Adolescence: A Case for the Well-Adapted Machiavellian , 2003 .