The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition

This article introduces the P-chain, an emerging framework for theory in psycholinguistics that unifies research on comprehension, production and acquisition. The framework proposes that language processing involves incremental prediction, which is carried out by the production system. Prediction necessarily leads to prediction error, which drives learning, including both adaptive adjustment to the mature language processing system as well as language acquisition. To illustrate the P-chain, we review the Dual-path model of sentence production, a connectionist model that explains structural priming in production and a number of facts about language acquisition. The potential of this and related models for explaining acquired and developmental disorders of sentence production is discussed.

[1]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Modeling language acquisition in atypical phenotypes. , 2003, Psychological review.

[2]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[4]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[5]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[6]  J B Oetting,et al.  Children with SLI use argument structure cues to learn verbs. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  Marius Janciauskas,et al.  Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[8]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton.  Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension , 1991 .

[12]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  D. Bishop,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE What Causes Specific Language Impairment in Children? , 2022 .

[14]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[15]  G. Dell,et al.  Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  C. Norbury,et al.  Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  M. MacDonald.  Distributional Information in Language Comprehension, Production, and Acquisition: Three Puzzles and a Moral , 2013 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[19]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  F. Chang.  Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production , 2002 .

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  Language deficits after apparent clinical recovery from childhood aphasia , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[22]  F. Chang,et al.  “Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language , 2001, Cognition.

[23]  Laine Matti,et al.  Modelling anomia by the discrete two-stage word production architecture , 1998, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[24]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Semantic Factors in Verb Retrieval: An Effect of Complexity , 1998, Brain and Language.

[25]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[26]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? , 2010, Cognition.

[27]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[28]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[29]  J. Elman.  Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.

[30]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English , 2009 .

[31]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[32]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Planning units and syntax in sentence production , 1978, Cognition.

[33]  G. Dell,et al.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production , 2007, Cognition.

[34]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Paola Cipriani,et al.  The Italian Determiner System in Normal Acquisition, Specific Language Impairment, and Childhood Aphasia , 2001, Brain and Language.

[37]  Sudha Arunachalam,et al.  Meaning from syntax: Evidence from 2-year-olds , 2010, Cognition.

[38]  Kevin Durkin,et al.  Specific language impairment and school outcomes. I: identifying and explaining variability at the end of compulsory education. , 2009, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[39]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Neuronal Plasticity: Building a Bridge from the Laboratory to the Clinic , 1999, Research and Perspectives in Neurosciences.

[40]  Caroline F. Rowland,et al.  Comprehension of Argument Structure and Semantic Roles: Evidence from English-Learning Children and the Forced-Choice Pointing Paradigm , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[42]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production , 2010, Cognition.

[43]  Ayumi Matsuo,et al.  Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[44]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[45]  Kara D. Federmeier.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[46]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift , 1998 .

[47]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  B. Woods,et al.  Changing patterns of childhood aphasia , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[49]  J. Morton,et al.  Effect of word transitional probability on phoneme identification , 1976 .

[50]  Sylvia Yuan,et al.  “Really? She Blicked the Baby?” , 2009, Psychological science.

[51]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[52]  T. Rogers,et al.  Lichtheim 2: Synthesizing Aphasia and the Neural Basis of Language in a Neurocomputational Model of the Dual Dorsal-Ventral Language Pathways , 2011, Neuron.

[53]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Verb schema use and input dependence in 5-year-old children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). , 2006, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[54]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .

[55]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.

[56]  Jean K. Gordon,et al.  Learning to divide the labor: an account of deficits in light and heavy verb production , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[58]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[59]  Dorothy V.M. Bishop,et al.  Grammatical Difficulties in Children with Specific Language Impairment: Is Learning Deficient? , 2011, Human Development.

[60]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  D. Plaut,et al.  Connectionist Modeling of Relearning and Generalization in Acquired Dyslexic Patients , 1999 .

[62]  Gary S Dell,et al.  Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[64]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[65]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Memory for Syntax Despite Amnesia , 2008, Psychological science.

[66]  R. Brubaker.  Models for the perception of speech and visual form: Weiant Wathen-Dunn, ed.: Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, I–X, 470 pages , 1968 .

[67]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology and syntax in specific language impairment: Evidence from a connectionist model , 2003, Brain and Language.

[68]  Falk Huettig,et al.  Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake--but only for skilled producers. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  Nick Chater,et al.  Language Learning From Positive Evidence, Reconsidered: A Simplicity-Based Approach , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[70]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2012 .

[71]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[72]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Selective difficulties with spoken nouns and written verbs: A single case study , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[73]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience , 2013, Cognition.

[74]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  Franklin Chang,et al.  A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses , 2011 .