Gigadalton-scale shape-programmable DNA assemblies

Natural biomolecular assemblies such as molecular motors, enzymes, viruses and subcellular structures often form by self-limiting hierarchical oligomerization of multiple subunits. Large structures can also assemble efficiently from a few components by combining hierarchical assembly and symmetry, a strategy exemplified by viral capsids. De novo protein design and RNA and DNA nanotechnology aim to mimic these capabilities, but the bottom-up construction of artificial structures with the dimensions and complexity of viruses and other subcellular components remains challenging. Here we show that natural assembly principles can be combined with the methods of DNA origami to produce gigadalton-scale structures with controlled sizes. DNA sequence information is used to encode the shapes of individual DNA origami building blocks, and the geometry and details of the interactions between these building blocks then control their copy numbers, positions and orientations within higher-order assemblies. We illustrate this strategy by creating planar rings of up to 350 nanometres in diameter and with atomic masses of up to 330 megadaltons, micrometre-long, thick tubes commensurate in size to some bacilli, and three-dimensional polyhedral assemblies with sizes of up to 1.2 gigadaltons and 450 nanometres in diameter. We achieve efficient assembly, with yields of up to 90 per cent, by using building blocks with validated structure and sufficient rigidity, and an accurate design with interaction motifs that ensure that hierarchical assembly is self-limiting and able to proceed in equilibrium to allow for error correction. We expect that our method, which enables the self-assembly of structures with sizes approaching that of viruses and cellular organelles, can readily be used to create a range of other complex structures with well defined sizes, by exploiting the modularity and high degree of addressability of the DNA origami building blocks used.

[1]  Hendrik Dietz,et al.  How We Make DNA Origami , 2017, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[2]  Wen Jiang,et al.  Directed self-assembly of DNA tiles into complex nanocages. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  P. Yin,et al.  Complex shapes self-assembled from single-stranded DNA tiles , 2012, Nature.

[4]  Peixuan Guo The emerging field of RNA nanotechnology. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[5]  A G Leslie,et al.  Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. , 1999, Science.

[6]  Jingdong Cheng,et al.  The force-sensing peptide VemP employs extreme compaction and secondary structure formation to induce ribosomal stalling , 2017, eLife.

[7]  A. Klug,et al.  Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. , 1962, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[8]  P. Rothemund Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[9]  Frank Sobott,et al.  Top‐down mass spectrometry of intact membrane protein complexes reveals oligomeric state and sequence information in a single experiment , 2015, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  David Baker,et al.  Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes , 2016, Science.

[11]  T. G. Martin,et al.  Cryo-EM structure of a 3D DNA-origami object , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Cody W. Geary,et al.  A single-stranded architecture for cotranscriptional folding of RNA nanostructures , 2014, Science.

[13]  H. Dietz,et al.  Placing molecules with Bohr radius resolution using DNA origami. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  Pekka Orponen,et al.  DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale , 2015, Nature.

[15]  B L Trus,et al.  Finding a needle in a haystack: detection of a small protein (the 12-kDa VP26) in a large complex (the 200-MDa capsid of herpes simplex virus). , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Marco Tartagni,et al.  Model-based prediction of the alpha-hemolysin structure in the hexameric state. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Maya Topf,et al.  Stepwise visualization of membrane pore formation by suilysin, a bacterial cholesterol-dependent cytolysin , 2014, eLife.

[19]  H. Dietz,et al.  Dynamic DNA devices and assemblies formed by shape-complementary, non–base pairing 3D components , 2015, Science.

[20]  Christopher M. MacDermaid,et al.  Computational design of a protein crystal , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Adam H. Marblestone,et al.  Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Johannes B. Woehrstein,et al.  Polyhedra Self-Assembled from DNA Tripods and Characterized with 3D DNA-PAINT , 2014, Science.

[23]  Richard B. Sessions,et al.  Computational design of water-soluble α-helical barrels , 2014, Science.

[24]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Structure of a Designed Protein Cage that Self-Assembles into a Highly Porous Cube , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[25]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Folding DNA into Twisted and Curved Nanoscale Shapes , 2009, Science.

[26]  David Baker,et al.  Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials , 2014, Nature.

[27]  N. Seeman,et al.  Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond , 2015, Science.

[28]  Jason D. Perlmutter,et al.  Mechanisms of virus assembly. , 2014, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[29]  W. Chiu,et al.  Designer nanoscale DNA assemblies programmed from the top down , 2016, Science.

[30]  Alexander McPherson,et al.  The structure of satellite panicum mosaic virus at 1.9 Å resolution , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.