Consumer responses to price discrimination: Discriminating bases, inequality status, and information disclosure timing influences☆

Abstract This study broadly explores consumers' perceived unfairness, negative emotions, internal reference price, and store choice under five common methods of price discrimination using two experimental studies. Study 1 investigates the interaction between discriminating bases and inequality status. Results reveal that discriminating bases only influence perceived unfairness for advantaged consumers, but affect all four responses for disadvantaged consumers. For disadvantaged consumers, direct discrimination that complies with social norms evokes the weakest unfavorable responses, whereas direct discrimination against social norms triggers the highest perception of unfairness and negative emotions but has similar effects on internal reference price and store choice to indirect discrimination. Study 2 examines the effect of information disclosure timing by comparing pre- and post-purchase disclosure policies. Results show that post-purchase disclosure of discrimination information elicits higher negative emotions for indirect discrimination involving coupon and purchase quantity, but is rather inconsequential for direct discrimination or indirect discrimination through membership.

[1]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  The effects of buyer identification and purchase timing on consumers’ perceptions of trust, price fairness, and repurchase intentions , 2004 .

[2]  Scot Burton,et al.  Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective , 1990 .

[3]  Sarah Maxwell,et al.  Consumer response to norm-breaking pricing events in e-commerce , 2010 .

[4]  Leon Festinger,et al.  Back to the Future: Retrospective Review of Leon Festinger's "A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance"@@@A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 1997 .

[5]  J. Greenberg,et al.  A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories , 1987 .

[6]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Do Loyalty Programs Really Enhance Behavioral Loyalty? An Empirical Analysis Accounting for Self-Selecting Members , 2006 .

[7]  J. Rossiter,et al.  The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs , 2007 .

[8]  Jen-Hung Huang,et al.  Perceived fairness of pricing on the Internet , 2005 .

[9]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[10]  Margaret C. Campbell.  “Says Who?!” how the Source of Price Information and Affect Influence Perceived Price (Un)fairness , 2007 .

[11]  B. Mellers,et al.  Perceptions of Fair Pricing , 2008 .

[12]  Fred M. Feinberg,et al.  Do we care what others Get? A Behaviorist Approach to Targeted Promotions , 2002 .

[13]  R. Folger.  Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. , 1977 .

[14]  Lien-Ti Bei,et al.  The Determinants of Consumers' Purchase Decisions for Recycled Products: An Application of Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory , 1995 .

[15]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[16]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  A dynamic segmentation approach for targeting and customizing direct marketing campaigns , 2006 .

[17]  G. Mcdougall,et al.  Consumer Appraisal of Retail Price Advertisements , 1974 .

[18]  Benjamin Van Roy,et al.  Dynamic Pricing with a Prior on Market Response , 2010, Oper. Res..

[19]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  Perceived price fairness: A new look at an old construct , 1994 .

[20]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  Dynamic pricing in internet retail: Effects on consumer trust , 2003 .

[21]  Lan Xia,et al.  The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions , 2004 .

[22]  Ju-Young Kim,et al.  Pay what you Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism , 2009 .

[23]  T. Mussweiler.  Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[24]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness , 2003 .

[25]  Kelly L. Haws,et al.  Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions , 2006 .

[26]  Tirthankar Roy,et al.  Does Exclusivity Always Pay Off? Exclusive Price Promotions and Consumer Response. , 2010 .

[27]  M. Armstrong.  Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination , 2006 .

[28]  D. Messick,et al.  An integrated model of perceived unfairness in organizations , 1995 .

[29]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Research Note - Does Demand Fall When Customers Perceive That Prices Are Unfair? The Case of Premium Pricing for Large Sizes , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[30]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[31]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Dynamic Pricing on the Internet: Importance and Implications for Consumer Behavior , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[32]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions , 1992 .

[33]  Praveen Aggarwal,et al.  Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions , 2003 .

[34]  Marsha L. Richins.  Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience , 1997 .

[35]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain , 2003 .

[36]  Pinar Keskinocak,et al.  Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: research overview, current practices, and future directions , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[37]  R. Bies.  Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness , 1986 .

[38]  N. J. Finkel.  Not Fair!: The Typology of Commonsense Unfairness , 2001 .